本文選題：判決　切入點(diǎn)：可接受性　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)目前正處于大力開(kāi)展法治建設(shè)的時(shí)期,法律作為調(diào)整社會(huì)關(guān)系的工具其重要性日益增強(qiáng),司法判決作為一項(xiàng)具有法律效力的定紛止?fàn)幍臎Q斷,圍繞其產(chǎn)生的一些問(wèn)題在我國(guó)法治建設(shè)中應(yīng)當(dāng)被予以重視;與此同時(shí),社會(huì)對(duì)司法判決的期望值也越來(lái)越高,傳統(tǒng)的以強(qiáng)制性為特征的司法己經(jīng)不能滿足人們解決糾紛的需要。司法作為糾紛解決的最后一道防線,能夠獲得整個(gè)社會(huì)成員的接受是化解矛盾、解決糾紛、構(gòu)建法治社會(huì)的關(guān)鍵,只有當(dāng)事人接受、社會(huì)成員認(rèn)同,即接受判決,司法判決的結(jié)果才能得到很好的遵守,從而一次性地、真正地解決糾紛。本文旨在對(duì)判決可接受性的相關(guān)問(wèn)題做出論述。本文主要分為以下四部分進(jìn)行論述: 第一部分:判決可接受性的概述。此部分主要介紹了判決可接受性的內(nèi)涵及其特點(diǎn)、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。所謂判決的可接受性,是指法院做出的判決所具有的能夠讓判決受眾認(rèn)同、信任和接受的屬性;判決可接受性同時(shí)具有主觀性、社會(huì)性、多元性的特點(diǎn);判決可接受性具有的較低層次的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)——服從及其較高層次的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)——服氣。 第二部分:判決可接受性的現(xiàn)狀及必要性。此部分介紹了我國(guó)目前司法判決的弊端,“執(zhí)行難”和“二次沖突”以及上訪、申訴現(xiàn)象頻繁,從而導(dǎo)致司法權(quán)威的喪失。同時(shí),由于司法和法律具有社會(huì)屬性,所以必須追求其社會(huì)效果,這是解決糾紛,構(gòu)建法治社會(huì)的必然要求。 第三部分:影響判決可接受性的因素。判決可接受性受很多因素的制約,包括文化心理因素、立法因素、司法因素、主體因素以及技術(shù)因素等。筆者將從各個(gè)方面對(duì)其進(jìn)行闡述。 第四部分:增強(qiáng)司法判決可接受性的建議。其一,要完善立法,克服我國(guó)立法固有的局限性。其二,要改革司法體制,嚴(yán)格貫徹司法獨(dú)立、司法公開(kāi)、正當(dāng)程序的原則。其三,提高司法主體素質(zhì),加強(qiáng)法官職業(yè)道德建設(shè)、提高法官專(zhuān)業(yè)素質(zhì)、塑造現(xiàn)代的司法理念。最后,從實(shí)用性和可操作性角度改進(jìn)判決理由的形成路徑。
[Abstract]:China is vigorously carry out the construction of the rule of law, the law as the tool of adjusting social relationship and its increasing importance, judicial decisions as a settling legal disputes resolution, should be paid attention to some problems about the rule of law in China; at the same time, the social expectations of judicial judgment the value is also more and more high, the traditional characteristics of a mandatory to the judiciary has been unable to meet the needs of people to solve disputes. The last defense line of the judicial dispute resolution as the access to the members of the community to accept is to resolve contradictions and disputes, the key construction of the rule of law, only the parties to accept members of society, identity, i.e. accept the verdict, the result of judicial decisions can be very good to comply with, and at once, the real solution to the dispute. This paper aims at the problems related to the acceptability of the judgment This article is mainly divided into the following four parts:
The first part: the overview of acceptability judgments. This part mainly introduces the connotation of sentence acceptability and characteristics, the so-called standard. The acceptability of verdict, refers to the decision made by the court to make decisions with the audience recognition, trust and acceptance of the property; the decision could be accepted by the society is subjective. And a plurality of characteristics; decision criteria for acceptable lower level with higher level and obey standard extent.
The second part: the status of acceptability judgments and necessity. This part introduces the shortcomings of our current judicial decisions, "difficult to execute" and "the two conflict" and the petition, the phenomenon of frequent complaints, resulting in the loss of judicial authority. At the same time, because of the judicial and law with social attribute, it must pursue its social effect, which is to solve the disputes, building the rule of law necessary.
The third part: the factors that affect the acceptability of adjudicature. The acceptability of adjudicatory is restricted by many factors, including cultural and psychological factors, legislative factors, judicial factors, subjective factors and technical factors.
The fourth part: to enhance the acceptability of the recommendations of judicial decisions. First, we must perfect the legislation, to overcome the limitations inherent in our legislation. Secondly, to reform the judicial system, strictly implement the judicial independence, judicial openness, the principles of due process. Thirdly, improve the quality of judicial body, strengthen the judge occupation moral construction, improve the judge professional quality, shaping the modern concept of justice. Finally, from the practical and operational perspective to improve the formation of ground path decision.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 鐘法;關(guān)于人民法院民事訴訟風(fēng)險(xiǎn)提示[J];中國(guó)注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師;2004年07期

2 蘇力;判決書(shū)的背后[J];法學(xué)研究;2001年03期

3 易延友;證據(jù)法學(xué)的理論基礎(chǔ)——以裁判事實(shí)的可接受性為中心[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年01期

4 韓邦舜;李德仁;;也論刑事訴訟理念[J];內(nèi)蒙古民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年01期

5 陳瑞華;程序正義論——從刑事審判角度的分析[J];中外法學(xué);1997年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳金木;判決可接受性的實(shí)證研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 趙艷斌;再議執(zhí)行難[D];鄭州大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1588216