發(fā)布時(shí)間：2023-08-29 21:24

　　本文主要從語用學(xué)角度對(duì)律師辯護(hù)詞中情態(tài)的選擇進(jìn)行了研究。旨在通過對(duì)30篇公開發(fā)行的各類律師辯護(hù)詞的描述性分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)常用情態(tài)的類型和律師選擇特定情態(tài)的動(dòng)機(jī),并揭示情態(tài)是如何實(shí)現(xiàn)其說服作用的。 本文的理論框架是以Verschueren的順應(yīng)論為基礎(chǔ),在分析語料的基礎(chǔ)上建立起來的。在此理論框架下情態(tài)被解釋為,對(duì)命題或者句子結(jié)構(gòu)起到修飾或者潤(rùn)色的各種語義成分,可以表達(dá)肯定或者懷疑的程度、模糊性、可能性、必要性、許可和義務(wù)等可以表達(dá)對(duì)話語態(tài)度的一類語義成分。結(jié)合彭宣維和Halliday對(duì)情態(tài)的劃分,考慮到律師語言的特色,我們把情態(tài)分為三類:評(píng)論附加情態(tài)、情態(tài)動(dòng)詞和語氣附加語、情態(tài)的混合用法。 首先通過對(duì)情態(tài)類型使用的頻數(shù)分析,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)情態(tài)的使用占到語料的44.7%,其中評(píng)論附加語的出現(xiàn)頻數(shù)為12.9%。其次,我們從心理因素和社會(huì)因素角度對(duì)情態(tài)的說服功能作了順應(yīng)分析。以上分析表明情態(tài)可用來順應(yīng)法官對(duì)辯護(hù)詞的評(píng)價(jià)和正確理解,提高辯護(hù)詞的客觀性,體現(xiàn)律師對(duì)某一事件的態(tài)度,維護(hù)保全律師的信譽(yù)度。 我們希望,本文的研究能有助于加深對(duì)情態(tài)的理解,認(rèn)識(shí)情態(tài)對(duì)于實(shí)現(xiàn)說服的作用;有助于順應(yīng)...

【文章頁數(shù)】：93 頁

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract(Chinese)
Abstract (English)
Contents
Lists of tables and figures
Chapter 1 Introduction
    1.1 Introduction
    1.2 Rationale of the present study
    1.3 Objective of the present study
    1.4. Data and methodology
    1.5. Delimitation of related concepts
    1.6. Organization of the paper
Chapter 2 Literature Review
    2.1 Introduction
    2.2 Previous study on persuasiveness in the court argument at home
    2.3 Previous study on the persuasiveness in court argument abroad
    2.4 Several approaches to modality
        2.4.1 Study on modality from the philosophical perspective
        2.4.2 Study on the classsificaiton of modality
        2.4.3 The semantic and syntactic study of modality
        2.4.4 The pragmatic study of modality
        2.4.5 The study of modality from the functional approach
    2.5 Summary
Chapter 3 Theoretical Framework
    3.1 Introductions
    3.2 Identification of modality in this paper
    3.3 Adaptation theory
        3.3.1 General picture of adaptation theory
        3.3.2 The role the three worlds in communication
    3.4 Modality as adaptation in the courtroom
        3.4.1 Construction of adaptation model in the present paper
        3.4.2 Articulation of the adaptation model in this paper
    3.5 Summary
Chapter 4 General Analysis of Modality Patterns
    4.1 Introductions
    4.2 Research methodology
    4.3 Descriptions of the data
    4.4 Frequency presentation of the modal patterns
        4.4.1 Comment adjuncts
        4.4.2 Modal verbs and modal adjuncts
        4.4.3 Combination use of modal elements
    4.5 Summary
Chapter 5 Adaptability of Modality in Lawyers' Arguments
    5.1 Introduction
    5.2 Adaptations to the mental world
        5.2.1 Adaptation to the cognitive elements
            5.2.1.1 Adaptation to the judge's evaluation of the argument
            5.2.1.2 Adaptation to the judge's perception of the argument
        5.2.2 Adaptation to the emotive elements
            5.2.2.1 Adaptation to manipulation of credibility
            5.2.2.2 Adaptation to the judge's feelings
    5.3 Adaptations to the social world
        5.3.1 Adaptations to power
        5.3.2 Adaptation to politeness
    5.4 Summary
Chapter 6 Conclusion
    6.1Summary
    6.2 Major findings
    6.3 Implications
    6.4 Limitations
Appendix A
Appendix B1
Appendix B2
Bibliography



本文編號(hào)：3844314