拉德布魯赫相對主義法哲學思想研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-03-23 15:27
【摘要】：拉德布魯赫是德國20世紀最偉大的、影響最為深遠的法哲學家和刑法學家之一。作為新康德主義海德堡學派在法哲學領(lǐng)域的重要代表人物，他以新康德主義哲學為基礎，繼承并發(fā)揚新康德主義法學傳統(tǒng)，開拓出相對主義法哲學思想。拉德布魯赫提出相對主義法哲學思想的目的在于，克服自然法學派的絕對價值主義的學派立場，及分析實證主義法學的絕對實證主義的學派立場，進而，探索出一條走向和解與寬容的法哲學路徑。但是，拉德布魯赫對傳統(tǒng)法哲學理論進行革新的學術(shù)努力，似乎并未得到應有的認可，其在二戰(zhàn)前后所顯示的“學術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)向問題”，更引來許多的議論。有些人認為，拉德布魯赫的學術(shù)努力是對自然法學說的復興；有些人則堅持認為，拉德布魯赫是一貫的和堅定的法律實證主義的擁躉；還有些人認為，拉德布魯赫的相對主義法哲學思想并沒有貢獻知識增量，且其法哲學思想內(nèi)部充滿矛盾，甚至難以自圓其說。那么，應該怎樣解讀拉德布魯赫相對主義法哲學思想？拉德布魯赫法哲學思想的真實面目是怎樣的？其法哲學思想的特質(zhì)有哪些？其法哲學思想的重要意義又有哪些方面？等，文章意圖對這些問題進行探討。 文章將從六個部分，依次展開對相關(guān)問題的論述： 引論部分，簡要地概述文章問題意識的緣起，并對關(guān)于拉德布魯赫法哲學思想研究的國內(nèi)外學術(shù)狀況，進行必要的梳理，提煉出寫作文章時可發(fā)揮的學術(shù)空間；同時，對寫作論文的研究方法做出簡單地說明。 第一部分，針對拉德布魯赫法哲學思想的理論基礎，進行介紹，其中包括兩部分：哲學基礎和法學基礎。并據(jù)此指出，其法哲學思想提出之初，，便以克服法哲學領(lǐng)域的自然法學與分析實證主義法學之爭，開拓法哲學研究的“第三條路徑”為目的。 第二部分，主要闡述開啟拉德布魯赫法哲學思想的“鑰匙”——相對主義的法學方法論。本部分內(nèi)容分為兩個方面：其一、闡明作為方法論意義上的相對主義的具體含義；其二、具體分析相對主義法學方法論產(chǎn)生的原因，及其所帶來的重要意義。 第三部分，具體剖析拉德布魯赫法哲學思想的主要內(nèi)容，具體來說，分為兩個部分：靜態(tài)分析和動態(tài)分析。在靜態(tài)分析部分，集中地對其法哲學思想體系進行解構(gòu)，對其法哲學思想所涉及到的重要概念（包括它們的含義、相互關(guān)系等）進行厘析，從而，揭示拉德布魯赫法哲學思想的內(nèi)在張力與和諧；在動態(tài)分析部分，將主要針對所謂的“拉德布魯赫法哲學思想轉(zhuǎn)向問題“進行深入解讀。通過比較分析得出，在二戰(zhàn)前后，拉德布魯赫法哲學思想實際上呈現(xiàn)出一致性與變革性相統(tǒng)一的重要特點。進而，指出其所謂的“學術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)向問題”并不存在，“法律的不法”與“超法律的法”的提出，只是實踐其理論的一種表現(xiàn)，和其“三元法哲學“體系話語的另一種展示。 第四部分，承接著第三部分，進一步地闡述拉德布魯赫法哲學思想的特質(zhì)，并在此基礎上，指出其法哲學思想給人們帶來的啟示，即重要的理論意義與實踐意義。首先，指出拉德布魯赫法哲學思想作為一種相對主義法哲學，為法哲學相關(guān)問題的研究開拓出新視角、新路徑，其思想內(nèi)在地包含著理性思考和寬容精神；且為事實和價值間緊張關(guān)系的緩解，提供了一種高明的方法論。其次，將法治國家建設的實踐與拉德布魯赫的法哲學思想相聯(lián)系，指出其思想在德國法治國建設中所起到的重要作用。 結(jié)語部分，再次檢視本文的寫作緣由和意義，對作者的觀點做進一步地強調(diào)。
[Abstract]:Radbroch is one of the greatest and most influential French philosophers and criminal jurists in the 20th century of Germany. As an important representative in the field of law philosophy, the Heidelberg School of the new Kantian doctrine, based on the neo-Kantian philosophy, inherited and developed the tradition of the neo-Kantian theory and opened up the philosophy of relativism. The purpose of Radbroch's philosophy of relativism is to overcome the school's position of the absolute value of the natural law school and to analyze the school's position of the absolute positivism of positivism. But Radbroch's academic efforts to innovate the traditional philosophy of philosophy seem to have not been duly recognized, and the "academic steering" that it had shown before and after the Second World War led to a lot of discussion. Some people believe that the academic efforts of the Radbroch are the revival of the natural law theory; others insist that the Radbroch is a consistent and firm legal positivism, and some believe that, The philosophy of relativism in Radbroch does not contribute to the increment of knowledge, and the interior of his method of law is full of contradictions, and it is even difficult to say. So, how should the philosophy of the Radbrooke's relativism approach be interpreted? What is the true nature of Radbroch's philosophy? What are the characteristics of the philosophy of the law? What is the important meaning of its philosophy of law? The article is intended to explore these problems. The article will, from six parts, expand the theory of the related problems in turn The paper: The introduction part, briefly outlines the origin of the issue consciousness of the article, and makes the necessary research on the academic situation at home and abroad on the study of the Radbroch's philosophy. The academic space that can be played when the article is written, and the research method of the writing paper is simple. The first part, which is based on the theoretical basis of the philosophy of the Radbroch method, includes two parts: the base of philosophy. On the basis of the law, the author points out that, at the beginning of the philosophy of law, it can overcome the dispute between the natural law and the positivism in the field of law philosophy, and explore the "Article 3Path" for the purpose. The second part mainly describes the "key" _ relative principal of the thought of opening the Radbroch's philosophy. The content of this part is divided into two aspects: one is the specific meaning of relativism in the sense of methodology; secondly, the reason of the methodological development of relativism is analyzed in detail, and the result The third part, in particular, analyzes the main contents of the Drouge's philosophy, in particular, it is divided into two parts: The static analysis and dynamic analysis, in the static analysis part, deconstructs the legal philosophy system of the law, and analyses the important concepts involved in the philosophy of the law, including their meaning, mutual relation, etc. In the dynamic analysis part, we will mainly focus on the so-called "On the steering of the radio" is an in-depth interpretation. By means of the comparative analysis, the Radbroch's philosophy of philosophy, before and after the Second World War, is in fact consistent and changing. In addition, it is pointed out that the so-called "academic steering" does not exist, the "the lawlessness of the law" and the "the law of ultra-law" are put forward, but only one of the performance of its theory and its "three-way philosophy" The fourth part, in the third part of the bearing, further expounds the characteristics of the philosophy of the Radbroch's law, and on the basis of this, points out the enlightenment of the philosophy of the law to the people, that is, the weight. In the first part, it is pointed out that the thought of Radbroch's philosophy is a relativism and the study of the related problems of law philosophy has developed a new visual angle and a new path, and its thought inherently contains the spirit of rational thinking and tolerance; and it is the fact and the relationship between the value and the value, This paper provides a good methodology. Secondly, the practice of building the rule of law in the state of the rule of law is in contact with the legal philosophy of the Radbroch, and it is pointed out that the thought of the country is governed by the German law. The important role played in the construction of this paper is to review the reason and meaning of the writing in this paper.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D90
本文編號：2445953
[Abstract]:Radbroch is one of the greatest and most influential French philosophers and criminal jurists in the 20th century of Germany. As an important representative in the field of law philosophy, the Heidelberg School of the new Kantian doctrine, based on the neo-Kantian philosophy, inherited and developed the tradition of the neo-Kantian theory and opened up the philosophy of relativism. The purpose of Radbroch's philosophy of relativism is to overcome the school's position of the absolute value of the natural law school and to analyze the school's position of the absolute positivism of positivism. But Radbroch's academic efforts to innovate the traditional philosophy of philosophy seem to have not been duly recognized, and the "academic steering" that it had shown before and after the Second World War led to a lot of discussion. Some people believe that the academic efforts of the Radbroch are the revival of the natural law theory; others insist that the Radbroch is a consistent and firm legal positivism, and some believe that, The philosophy of relativism in Radbroch does not contribute to the increment of knowledge, and the interior of his method of law is full of contradictions, and it is even difficult to say. So, how should the philosophy of the Radbrooke's relativism approach be interpreted? What is the true nature of Radbroch's philosophy? What are the characteristics of the philosophy of the law? What is the important meaning of its philosophy of law? The article is intended to explore these problems. The article will, from six parts, expand the theory of the related problems in turn The paper: The introduction part, briefly outlines the origin of the issue consciousness of the article, and makes the necessary research on the academic situation at home and abroad on the study of the Radbroch's philosophy. The academic space that can be played when the article is written, and the research method of the writing paper is simple. The first part, which is based on the theoretical basis of the philosophy of the Radbroch method, includes two parts: the base of philosophy. On the basis of the law, the author points out that, at the beginning of the philosophy of law, it can overcome the dispute between the natural law and the positivism in the field of law philosophy, and explore the "Article 3Path" for the purpose. The second part mainly describes the "key" _ relative principal of the thought of opening the Radbroch's philosophy. The content of this part is divided into two aspects: one is the specific meaning of relativism in the sense of methodology; secondly, the reason of the methodological development of relativism is analyzed in detail, and the result The third part, in particular, analyzes the main contents of the Drouge's philosophy, in particular, it is divided into two parts: The static analysis and dynamic analysis, in the static analysis part, deconstructs the legal philosophy system of the law, and analyses the important concepts involved in the philosophy of the law, including their meaning, mutual relation, etc. In the dynamic analysis part, we will mainly focus on the so-called "On the steering of the radio" is an in-depth interpretation. By means of the comparative analysis, the Radbroch's philosophy of philosophy, before and after the Second World War, is in fact consistent and changing. In addition, it is pointed out that the so-called "academic steering" does not exist, the "the lawlessness of the law" and the "the law of ultra-law" are put forward, but only one of the performance of its theory and its "three-way philosophy" The fourth part, in the third part of the bearing, further expounds the characteristics of the philosophy of the Radbroch's law, and on the basis of this, points out the enlightenment of the philosophy of the law to the people, that is, the weight. In the first part, it is pointed out that the thought of Radbroch's philosophy is a relativism and the study of the related problems of law philosophy has developed a new visual angle and a new path, and its thought inherently contains the spirit of rational thinking and tolerance; and it is the fact and the relationship between the value and the value, This paper provides a good methodology. Secondly, the practice of building the rule of law in the state of the rule of law is in contact with the legal philosophy of the Radbroch, and it is pointed out that the thought of the country is governed by the German law. The important role played in the construction of this paper is to review the reason and meaning of the writing in this paper.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D90
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 鈴木敬夫;論自由社會主義——論拉德布魯赫《社會主義文化理論》的現(xiàn)代意義[J];比較法研究;2004年05期
2 柯嵐;;告密、良心自由與現(xiàn)代合法性的困境——法哲學視野中的告密者難題[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2009年06期
3 朱力宇;劉建偉;;新康德主義法學三論[J];法學家;2007年05期
4 柯衛(wèi);周超;;論實證主義法學關(guān)于法律與道德關(guān)系的自然法化[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(中旬刊);2010年01期
5 陳坤;;拉德布魯赫《法律上的人》及其借鑒意義[J];江蘇警官學院學報;2007年04期
6 朱淑麗;;紐倫堡審判面臨的困境及其解決[J];華東政法學院學報;2006年03期
7 鈴木敬夫;宋海彬;;論人的尊嚴與死刑廢止——以拉德布魯赫的刑法草案與行刑論為中心[J];華東政法大學學報;2008年04期
8 柯嵐;;拉德布魯赫公式的意義及其在二戰(zhàn)后德國司法中的運用[J];華東政法大學學報;2009年04期
9 陳暉;西方法哲學的現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)型及其發(fā)展[J];蘭州學刊;2004年04期
10 林海;;哈富論戰(zhàn)、拉德布魯赫公式及納粹法制迷案——從歷史視角透析理論問題[J];南京大學法律評論;2008年Z1期
本文編號：2445953
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fashilw/2445953.html
