【摘要】： 批評性語篇分析產生于20世紀70年代末,它是以揭示語言、權利和意識形態(tài)的潛在關系為目的的。在他們看來,任何語篇都不是絕對客觀的,而或多或少都會受到意識形態(tài)或其它因素的影響,因此,本文便以此作為依據,運用費爾克拉夫的三項度模式和韓禮德的系統(tǒng)功能語法理論對中國的法律語篇進行分析,以此來揭示隱藏在法律語篇中的權力意識。 本文的整個分析過程是從宏觀和微觀兩個角度進行的。首先,筆者借用韓禮德的系統(tǒng)功能語法、對語篇的語言特征:詞匯、轉化、情態(tài)和及物性等進行了描述,并分析了權力意識在這一過程是如何實現的;然后,筆者又以費爾克拉夫的三項度模式為依據,結合社會和歷史條件來解釋法律語篇和社會結構的關系,也就是說明社會條件如何影響法律語篇的生成,以及法律語篇又對這些社會條件有哪些影響。 本文的最后結論是:法律語篇作為國家調控社會關系及保障社會運行的手段,必然要體現一定的權力意識,且這種權力意識是不可避免的。因此,這就要求立法者或其它法學人士要充分意識到這一點,在制定法律及運用法律時,既要考慮它的權威性及強制性,同時也要考慮被統(tǒng)治階級的可承受性。
[Abstract]:Critical discourse analysis (CDA), which originated in the late 1970s, aims to reveal the potential relationship among language, rights and ideology. In their view, any text is not absolutely objective, but is more or less influenced by ideology or other factors. Based on Felke's trichotomy model and Halliday's systematic functional grammar theory, the author analyzes the Chinese legal discourse in order to reveal the consciousness of power hidden in the legal discourse. The whole analysis process of this paper is carried out from both macro and micro angles. First of all, the author uses Halliday's systemic functional grammar to describe the linguistic features of the discourse: vocabulary, transformation, modality and transitivity, and analyzes how power consciousness is realized in this process. The author also explains the relationship between legal discourse and social structure on the basis of Felke's three-degree model, combining with social and historical conditions, that is to say, how social conditions affect the formation of legal discourse. And the influence of legal discourse on these social conditions. The final conclusion of this paper is that legal discourse, as a means for the state to regulate social relations and ensure social operation, must embody a certain sense of power, and this kind of power consciousness is inevitable. Therefore, this requires legislators or other jurists to be fully aware of this point. When making laws and applying laws, they should not only consider its authoritativeness and compulsion, but also the affordability of the ruling class.
【學位授予單位】：黑龍江大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D90-055

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前9條

1 孟登迎;意識形態(tài)國家機器[J];外國文學;2004年01期

2 戴煒華,陳宇昀;批評語篇分析的理論和方法[J];外語研究;2004年04期

3 李杰;情態(tài)的表達與意識形態(tài)的體現[J];外語學刊;2005年04期

4 施光;辛斌;;試析美國憲法中的情態(tài)系統(tǒng)[J];外語學刊;2008年02期

5 管振彬;淺談語法隱喻及其實際意義[J];湖北教育學院學報;2005年05期

6 項蘊華;簡述Fairclough的語篇分析觀[J];山東外語教學;2004年05期

7 李素玲;批評性語篇分析:發(fā)展概況及應用前景[J];山東外語教學;2004年05期

8 朱士昌;情態(tài)值——社會人際關系的鏡子[J];上海師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2002年05期

9 顧曉波;;批評性話語分析述評[J];鄭州航空工業(yè)管理學院學報(社會科學版);2007年01期

，

本文編號：2271357