論公權(quán)與私權(quán)之間的平衡
發(fā)布時間：2018-09-10 16:12
【摘要】：權(quán)利與權(quán)力是法理學(xué)的一對非常重要的基本范疇,權(quán)利與權(quán)力構(gòu)成的關(guān)系是法律調(diào)整的核心。權(quán)利是權(quán)力的來源,權(quán)力是權(quán)利的保障,這已經(jīng)被我們理論界所公認。人類社會生活可以分為兩大領(lǐng)域,一是政治國家生活領(lǐng)域,二是市民社會生活領(lǐng)域。市民社會與政治國家在漫長的人類歷史的演進過程中矛盾的發(fā)展,這種演進過程表現(xiàn)為私權(quán)與公權(quán)的不斷糾合、對峙、妥協(xié)。對于現(xiàn)代社會來講,建立在自由平等基礎(chǔ)上的公民權(quán)利,是一個政治共同體據(jù)以維持與發(fā)展的現(xiàn)實起點。與此同時現(xiàn)代社會中,隨著政府職能的不斷擴大,公權(quán)已經(jīng)滲入到社會生活的各個方面各個角落,可以說,只要有人存在的地方,就有公權(quán)的存在。公權(quán)的權(quán)力主體在行使權(quán)力時,一旦因其貪念而超出了法律預(yù)先設(shè)定的程序軌道,權(quán)力則必然濫用,自古至今一切權(quán)力的擁有者都沒能逃脫權(quán)力濫用的怪圈。要想防止權(quán)力的濫用這就需要我們?yōu)闄?quán)力的行使設(shè)定條件和程序,用權(quán)利來制約權(quán)力。如何合理地定位公權(quán)與私權(quán),平衡好公權(quán)與私權(quán)的沖突,規(guī)制好公權(quán),保障好私權(quán),使公權(quán)能更充分地為私權(quán)服務(wù),已成為我國建設(shè)社會主義法治國家的一個重要課題,這也正是本文研究目的之所在。本文的第一部分介紹了公權(quán)與私權(quán)的關(guān)系,分析了平衡公權(quán)與私權(quán)的理論價值,第二部分由一個案例引發(fā),著重探討了公權(quán)與私權(quán)發(fā)生沖突的原因,我國現(xiàn)階段公權(quán)與私權(quán)沖突的表現(xiàn),以及公權(quán)介入私權(quán)的條件。第三部分提出了筆者對如何平衡公權(quán)與私權(quán)關(guān)系這一問題的建議。樹立公民的權(quán)利意識,健全完善法律運行體制,積極發(fā)揮社會組織的潤滑劑作用。只有這樣才能使公權(quán)和私權(quán)行為走上法治化道路。
[Abstract]:Right and power are a very important basic category of jurisprudence, and the relationship between right and power is the core of legal adjustment. Right is the source of power and power is the guarantee of right, which has been recognized by our theorists. Human social life can be divided into two major areas, one is political and national life, the other is civil life. The development of contradiction between civil society and political state in the process of evolution of human history is manifested in the constant reconciliation of private right and public power, confrontation and compromise. For modern society, the civil right based on freedom and equality is the realistic starting point for the maintenance and development of a political community. At the same time, in modern society, with the continuous expansion of government functions, public power has penetrated into every aspect of social life, it can be said that as long as there are places, there is public power. When the power subject of public power is exercising its power, once it oversteps the procedure set by the law because of its greed, the power is bound to be abused. Since ancient times, all the power holders have not been able to escape the strange circle of power abuse. To prevent the abuse of power, we need to set conditions and procedures for the exercise of power and restrict power with power. How to reasonably locate public rights and private rights, balance the conflicts between public rights and private rights, regulate public rights, protect private rights, and make public rights serve private rights more fully has become an important subject in building a socialist country ruled by law. This is the purpose of this study. The first part of this paper introduces the relationship between public right and private right, and analyzes the theoretical value of balancing public right and private right. The second part is triggered by a case, focusing on the causes of the conflict between public right and private right. The expression of the conflict between public right and private right, and the condition of public right intervening in private right. The third part puts forward the author's suggestion on how to balance the relation between public right and private right. Set up the citizen's right consciousness, perfect the law operation system, give play to the lubricant function of the social organization actively. Only in this way can public rights and private rights be ruled by law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D90
本文編號：2234952
[Abstract]:Right and power are a very important basic category of jurisprudence, and the relationship between right and power is the core of legal adjustment. Right is the source of power and power is the guarantee of right, which has been recognized by our theorists. Human social life can be divided into two major areas, one is political and national life, the other is civil life. The development of contradiction between civil society and political state in the process of evolution of human history is manifested in the constant reconciliation of private right and public power, confrontation and compromise. For modern society, the civil right based on freedom and equality is the realistic starting point for the maintenance and development of a political community. At the same time, in modern society, with the continuous expansion of government functions, public power has penetrated into every aspect of social life, it can be said that as long as there are places, there is public power. When the power subject of public power is exercising its power, once it oversteps the procedure set by the law because of its greed, the power is bound to be abused. Since ancient times, all the power holders have not been able to escape the strange circle of power abuse. To prevent the abuse of power, we need to set conditions and procedures for the exercise of power and restrict power with power. How to reasonably locate public rights and private rights, balance the conflicts between public rights and private rights, regulate public rights, protect private rights, and make public rights serve private rights more fully has become an important subject in building a socialist country ruled by law. This is the purpose of this study. The first part of this paper introduces the relationship between public right and private right, and analyzes the theoretical value of balancing public right and private right. The second part is triggered by a case, focusing on the causes of the conflict between public right and private right. The expression of the conflict between public right and private right, and the condition of public right intervening in private right. The third part puts forward the author's suggestion on how to balance the relation between public right and private right. Set up the citizen's right consciousness, perfect the law operation system, give play to the lubricant function of the social organization actively. Only in this way can public rights and private rights be ruled by law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D90
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李正生;公民法律意識現(xiàn)狀及對策研究[J];長春大學(xué)學(xué)報;2004年03期
2 隋臻瑋,于正河;簡論行政權(quán)力與公民權(quán)利之平衡[J];東方論壇(青島大學(xué)學(xué)報);1998年03期
3 葛洪義;;論法律權(quán)利的概念[J];法律科學(xué)-西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;1989年01期
4 呂繼東;憲法:權(quán)利和權(quán)力[J];電子政務(wù);2004年01期
5 王安鵬;;行政法的公法性質(zhì)及其表現(xiàn)[J];南方論刊;2008年05期
6 孫國華,楊思斌;公私法的劃分與法的內(nèi)在結(jié)構(gòu)[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2004年04期
7 郭道暉;;權(quán)力的特性及其要義[J];山東科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2006年02期
8 汪淵智;;理性思考公權(quán)力與私權(quán)利的關(guān)系[J];山西大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2006年04期
9 賀斌;論法治進程中的人權(quán)法律保護[J];湖南行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年02期
10 黎慈;;論柔性行政執(zhí)法有效實現(xiàn)的保障機制[J];延邊黨校學(xué)報;2007年02期
，本文編號：2234952
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fashilw/2234952.html
