本文選題：正當(dāng)防衛(wèi) + 自我防衛(wèi)�。� 參考：《中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 近年來(lái),隨著中國(guó)刑法理論研究的不斷深入,學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)德國(guó)等大陸法系國(guó)家的刑法進(jìn)行了越來(lái)越多的研究。而對(duì)英美法系國(guó)家的刑法研究則相對(duì)較少。在刑法理論中,正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的理論具有濃厚的文化底蘊(yùn),與一個(gè)民族的文化歷史背景息息相關(guān)。因此,本文借這一主題,通過(guò)分析、歸納、比較的研究方法,對(duì)美國(guó)刑法理論中的正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)的梳理和分析,以期能為國(guó)內(nèi)美國(guó)刑法正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的研究提供相關(guān)的資料。 本文以《模范刑法典》以及四部州刑法典中的正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的內(nèi)容為中心,以“法條考察——理論學(xué)說(shuō)”為主線,對(duì)美國(guó)現(xiàn)行刑法中的正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)理論進(jìn)行考察,以期概括出美國(guó)刑法正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的特點(diǎn)以及其對(duì)中國(guó)刑法正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的可借鑒之處。 本文除引言外,共四章,總字?jǐn)?shù)為四萬(wàn)七千余字((包括腳注五千余字)。第一部分為引言。概述了美國(guó)刑法中正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的性質(zhì)、地位并對(duì)其種類(lèi)做了重新界定,為下文的論述作了鋪墊。 第二部分為自我防衛(wèi)。在考察五部制定法的基礎(chǔ)上,詳細(xì)研究了自我防衛(wèi)的構(gòu)成要件、有關(guān)自我防衛(wèi)的理論學(xué)說(shuō)以及合理性、不完美自我防衛(wèi)等熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題。 第三部分為防衛(wèi)他人。在考察五部制定法的基礎(chǔ)上,詳細(xì)研究了防衛(wèi)他人的歷史沿革與認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤、墮胎等熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題。 第四部分為防衛(wèi)財(cái)產(chǎn)與防衛(wèi)住宅。在考察五部制定法的基礎(chǔ)上,筆者對(duì)這一防衛(wèi)類(lèi)型的內(nèi)涵、構(gòu)成要件以及彈簧槍的使用等熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了研究。 第五部分為中美刑法正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的比較。筆者從該制度在刑法體系中的地位、種類(lèi)、保護(hù)的法益范圍、防衛(wèi)裝置、逆防衛(wèi)等方面進(jìn)行比較,概括出美國(guó)刑法正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的特點(diǎn)以及其對(duì)中國(guó)刑法正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的可借鑒之處。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the development of the theory of criminal law in China, more and more researches have been carried out on the criminal law of civil law countries such as Germany. However, the research on the criminal law of common law countries is relatively few. In the theory of criminal law, the theory of justifiable defense has strong cultural background, which is closely related to the cultural and historical background of a nation. Therefore, this paper, through the analysis, induction and comparison of the research methods, systematically combs and analyzes the justifiable defense in the theory of American criminal law, in order to provide relevant information for the study of the legitimate defense of the American criminal law in China. This paper focuses on the contents of the Model Criminal Code and the self-defense in the four state criminal codes, and takes "the investigation of the articles of Law-the Theory of Theory" as the main line to investigate the theory of justifiable defense in the current criminal law of the United States. The purpose of this paper is to summarize the characteristics of the legitimate defense of American criminal law and its reference to the legitimate defense of Chinese criminal law. In addition to the introduction, this paper consists of four chapters, with a total of more than 47000 words (including more than 5, 000 footnotes). The first part is the introduction. This paper summarizes the nature and status of justifiable defense in American criminal law, and redefines its types, which pave the way for the following discussion. The second part is self-defense. Based on the investigation of the five laws, this paper studies in detail the constitutive elements of self-defense, the theory of self-defense, the rationality and imperfect self-defense and other hot issues. The third part is the defense of others. On the basis of the investigation of the five laws, this paper studies in detail the historical evolution, cognitive errors, abortion and other hot issues of defending others. The fourth part is the defense property and the defense house. On the basis of the investigation of the five-part formulation method, the author studies the intension of this defense type, the constitutive elements and the use of the spring gun, and so on. The fifth part is the comparison of legitimate defense between Chinese and American criminal law. The author compares the position, type, scope of legal interests of protection, defense device and inverse defense of the system in the criminal law system, and generalizes the characteristics of the legitimate defense of American criminal law and its reference to the legitimate defense of Chinese criminal law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：DD914;D971.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 賴(lài)早興;;美國(guó)犯罪成立要件與證明責(zé)任分配[J];法學(xué)家;2007年03期

2 王海橋;馬淵杰;;對(duì)正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)適用中兩點(diǎn)困惑的思考[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2008年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王國(guó)賓;正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)疑難問(wèn)題論要[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1934427