發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-24 04:52

  本文選題：清末修律 + 禮法之爭(zhēng)��； 參考：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 對(duì)于男女之間無合法婚姻形式而私自兩性交合所造成的社會(huì)問題,究竟該齊之以刑還是導(dǎo)之以禮?這對(duì)于曾長(zhǎng)期存在的傳統(tǒng)的中華法而言似乎不是一個(gè)問題。然而時(shí)至晚清,在被迫“法商化”的過程中,由于守常與思變的雙重角力,禮與刑在維護(hù)社會(huì)秩序中的功能定位問題就成為一個(gè)亟需澄清的問題。清末修律中,禮教派與法理派的上層之“士”,作為統(tǒng)治階層之中的被統(tǒng)治者,雙方展開激烈而深刻的詞語爭(zhēng)奪,從而上演中國(guó)法制史上一段比較罕見的禮法論爭(zhēng)。 本文,以中國(guó)中世紀(jì)刑律中“奸罪”的法律表達(dá)及其倫理根據(jù)為緣起,接著先是間接考察清代民間兩性婚外交往狀況,繼而通過清末判詞考察奸罪的司法實(shí)踐。然后選取三個(gè)歷史點(diǎn)來論述無夫奸存廢之辯:上迄清初“中國(guó)禮儀之爭(zhēng)”,中置無夫奸存廢之爭(zhēng),尾至中華民國(guó)舊刑法無夫奸除罪。最后,希望通過對(duì)無夫奸存廢之爭(zhēng)的考察重新認(rèn)識(shí)禮法之爭(zhēng)所反映的歷史問題。
[Abstract]:As for the social problems caused by sexual intercourse without legal marriage between men and women, should they be punished or guided by ceremony? This does not seem to be a problem for the traditional Chinese law that existed for a long time. However, in the process of being forced to "legalize" from time to the late Qing Dynasty, due to the double struggle between observing the common law and thinking about change, the function orientation of propriety and punishment in the maintenance of social order has become a problem that needs to be clarified. In the late Qing Dynasty, as the rulers of the ruling class, the upper "scholar" of the ritual sect and the legal school, the two sides engaged in fierce and profound word competition, thus staged a relatively rare debate about etiquette and law in the history of Chinese legal system. This article, based on the legal expression and ethical basis of the crime of rape in the Chinese medieval criminal law, first indirectly examines the external intercourse between the two sexes in the Qing Dynasty, and then investigates the judicial practice of the crime of rape through the judgment of the late Qing Dynasty. Then three historical points are selected to discuss the argument of "the dispute of Chinese etiquette" between the former and the beginning of Qing Dynasty, and the debate between the former criminal law of the Republic of China and the old criminal law of the Republic of China. Finally, the author hopes to re-understand the historical problems reflected in the debate about the absence of husband and rape.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D929

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 潘大禮;民國(guó)三四十年代湖北婚姻沖突案例研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 程方圓;試論清代的奸罪[D];天津師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1927749