本文選題：法律修辭 + 司法強拆��； 參考：《山西師大學報(社會科學版)》2012年06期

【摘要】：法律修辭學的核心在于其"聽眾理論"。"司法強拆"作為一種從司法到立法的全方位的法律修辭,其聽眾有以下三類:(1)普遍聽眾,即為社會大眾。(2)單一聽眾,即具體案件當中的當事人。(3)說理者本身,即國家行政機關。而作為法律修辭的"司法強拆"的立法旨趣僅僅在于通過對三種聽眾進行分化,爭取大多數(shù)的與具體案情沒有直接關系的社會大眾,在現(xiàn)有框架下盡量保證部分聽眾之間的局部矛盾不會輕而易舉的膨脹并發(fā)酵為其他矛盾。這種修辭存在概念的不穩(wěn)定性、價值初衷的功利性、實踐的顛覆性等三方面實務操作困境,但即便如此,"司法強拆"依然存在增量意義。
[Abstract]:The core of legal rhetoric lies in its audience theory. As a kind of omnidirectional legal rhetoric from judicature to legislation, the audience of judicial forced demolition is as follows: 1) the general audience, that is, the social mass, the single audience, that is, the litigant in the concrete case, the reasoning person himself, that is, the state administrative organ. The legislative purport of "judicial demolition" as legal rhetoric is only to divide the three kinds of listeners and win over the majority of the public who are not directly related to the specific circumstances of the case. Under the existing framework, try to ensure that local conflicts between some listeners do not expand easily and grow into other contradictions. There are three practical difficulties in this kind of rhetoric, such as the instability of concept, the utilitarianism of the original intention of value and the subversive nature of practice, but even so, there is still incremental significance in "judicial demolition".
【作者單位】： 重慶工商大學法學院;
【分類號】：D90-55

【共引文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 劉玫;張建英;;我國大陸與臺灣地區(qū)搜查要件之分析研究——比較法視野的考量[J];比較法研究;2006年05期

2 傅賢國;;農(nóng)村糾紛解決——對一起水庫案的實證考察[J];北京政法職業(yè)學院學報;2005年04期

3 李長健;王t，

本文編號：1789906