本文選題：法律意識(shí)形態(tài)　切入點(diǎn)：建制論證　出處：《華東師范大學(xué)》2009年博士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 法律意識(shí)形態(tài)既是意識(shí)形態(tài)的一個(gè)分支，又是法理學(xué)、法哲學(xué)的重要組成部分，，其在意識(shí)形態(tài)研究和法學(xué)研究中本應(yīng)具有十分重要的地位。但是該問(wèn)題在目前的研究十分薄弱，表現(xiàn)在如下方面，其一，沒(méi)有將法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的范疇特定化；其二，沒(méi)有將法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的范疇體系化。其三，沒(méi)有將法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的范疇與相關(guān)范疇相區(qū)分。為了使法律意識(shí)形態(tài)引起理論界的重視及對(duì)于中國(guó)意識(shí)形態(tài)策略有所助益，本文從法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的內(nèi)涵、結(jié)構(gòu)、功能、及歷史發(fā)展脈胳做出了深入分析的基礎(chǔ)上，指出法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的策略應(yīng)該是通過(guò)建構(gòu)法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的主體，進(jìn)而通過(guò)法律意識(shí)形態(tài)批判從而加強(qiáng)主流法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的主導(dǎo)權(quán)并使建制論證功能更加突顯。 分析法律意識(shí)形態(tài)是交互于建制與論證之間的內(nèi)在關(guān)系，文中就建制論證的歷史形態(tài)做了一個(gè)先期的梳理，總結(jié)了理性一道德的建制論證模式、規(guī)范一制度的建制論證范式、合理一合法的建制論證模式為代表的三種建制論證模式，并進(jìn)而分析建制與論證之間的內(nèi)在沖突的原因。厘定了法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的基本概念。首先從前蘇聯(lián)學(xué)者、西方學(xué)者及我國(guó)學(xué)者的理論研究中分析了法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的理論淵源，并揭示了對(duì)于法律意識(shí)形態(tài)研究的理論的不足。其后從法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的體系化的視角分析了，對(duì)法律意識(shí)形態(tài)內(nèi)涵從法律意識(shí)形態(tài)主體是特定階層或群體、法律意識(shí)形態(tài)客體是法律現(xiàn)象的觀念體系、法律意識(shí)形態(tài)在主觀方面是主體的認(rèn)知、法律意識(shí)形態(tài)在客觀方面的反作用等四方面做了完整的界定。其后通過(guò)對(duì)作為上層建筑的法律與作為上層建筑的法律意識(shí)形態(tài)、作為觀念形態(tài)的法律意識(shí)與法律意識(shí)形態(tài)、法律文化與法律意識(shí)形態(tài)、法律理論與法律意識(shí)形態(tài)等范疇之間的區(qū)分，對(duì)法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的外延做了基本區(qū)分。 法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的結(jié)構(gòu)、功能等范疇是將法律意識(shí)形態(tài)置于宏觀的背景的動(dòng)態(tài)考察。法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的縱深結(jié)構(gòu)包含法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的認(rèn)知、生產(chǎn)、引領(lǐng)、觀念整合等內(nèi)容，法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的橫向結(jié)構(gòu)包括憲政、刑事、民事、程序等具體方面，法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的運(yùn)行結(jié)構(gòu)則由立法、司法和行政執(zhí)法部分組成；法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的功能主要體現(xiàn)在法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的觀念凝聚、法治運(yùn)行促進(jìn)功能和法律社會(huì)整合功能等。 法律意識(shí)形態(tài)建構(gòu)的中國(guó)理路是恢復(fù)法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的主體性地位，從而在法律意識(shí)形態(tài)批判中取得對(duì)于法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的主導(dǎo)權(quán)。該部分先分析了當(dāng)下中國(guó)的法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的歷史脈胳，主要體現(xiàn)了法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的法律工具主義階段、法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的法律虛無(wú)主義階段、法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的法制建構(gòu)階段、法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的法治選擇階段等發(fā)展階段。社會(huì)主義主流法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的界定從法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的諸種表現(xiàn)著眼，并在堅(jiān)持主流、抵制異質(zhì)、發(fā)展多樣之間予以界定，并且探討走出總體意識(shí)形態(tài)的法律意識(shí)形態(tài)對(duì)意識(shí)形態(tài)超越的初步理論嘗試；法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的主體建構(gòu)旨在改變單方面法律意識(shí)形態(tài)主體的退隱、互為主體與對(duì)象之間的交律主體性缺失的境況，從而使法律意識(shí)形態(tài)建構(gòu)的主體和法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的主體建構(gòu)之間形成一種辯證關(guān)系，既向內(nèi)建構(gòu)法律意識(shí)形態(tài)主體意志自由的內(nèi)向價(jià)值，又向外建構(gòu)法律意識(shí)形態(tài)主體平等的外向價(jià)值。法律意識(shí)形態(tài)批判在意識(shí)形態(tài)歷史性轉(zhuǎn)向后依然有其必要性，法律意識(shí)形態(tài)批判的有效進(jìn)行依賴于批判系統(tǒng)的生成，并在對(duì)于法學(xué)理論研究、法治實(shí)踐進(jìn)行批判的同時(shí)加強(qiáng)法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的主導(dǎo)權(quán)。
[Abstract]:Legal ideology is a branch of ideology, and is an important part of jurisprudence, philosophy of law, the ideology research and study of law should have a very important position. But the problems in the present research is very weak, manifested in the following aspects. First, no specific category of legal ideology; second no, the category system of legal ideology. Thirdly, no legal ideology category and related category. In order to distinguish the legal ideology caused the attention of the theoretical circles and be helpful for China ideology strategy, this paper starts from the connotation of legal ideology, structure, function, and historical development has made the thorough analysis based on the the author points out the legal ideology, strategy should be the subject construction of legal ideology, and then through the criticism of legal ideology to add The dominant power of the strong mainstream legal ideology makes the function of the argumentation more prominent.
Analysis of the legal ideology is the inherent relationship between the system and interaction between argumentation, in this paper the historical forms of organization and demonstration made a preliminary combing, summarizes the organization and demonstration models of rational moral norms, system pattern of demonstration system, a reasonable legal system on the three system demonstration mode as the representative of the certificate the reason, and then analyzes the internal conflict between construction and demonstration. Basic concepts of legal ideology. First, the former Soviet Union scholars, theoretical research of western scholars and Chinese scholars in the analysis of the theoretical origin of legal ideology, and reveals the research on the legal ideology theory. Then from the legal ideology system from the perspective of legal ideology, from the main body of legal ideology is a particular class or group, the object of legal ideology is a legal phenomenon The concept of legal system, ideology is the main cognitive in the subjective aspect, the four aspects of the legal ideology in the objective aspect of the reaction makes a complete definition. Then by means of the superstructure of the law and legal ideology as the superstructure, as legal consciousness and legal ideology ideology, legal culture and legal ideology. The distinction between legal theory and legal ideology categories, the extension of legal ideology to make a basic distinction.
The structure of legal ideology, function category is the dynamic study of the legal ideology under the macro background. The vertical structure of legal ideology contains the legal ideology cognition, production, lead, concept integration and other content, the transverse structure of legal ideology of criminal, civil, kit Kuo Xianzheng, specific program, run by the structure of legal ideology the legislative, judicial and administrative law enforcement part; legal function of ideology is mainly reflected in the legal ideology of the concept of cohesion, promote the operation of law function and legal function of social integration.
The construction of legal ideology is Chinese logic subjectivity restoration of legal ideology, dominance for legal ideology in the criticism of legal ideology to. This part firstly analyses the current legal ideology of the history of China framework mainly embodies the legal tools of the legal ideology doctrine of legal ideology, legal nihilism, legal ideology the construction of the legal system of the rule of law, the legal ideology selection stage and other development stages. The definition from the perspective of all kinds of forms of legal consciousness of the socialist mainstream legal ideology, and resist the heterogeneity in the mainstream development, adhere to the diversity between, defines and discusses the legal ideology out of the collective ideology of the theory of ideology of preliminary attempt beyond the subject of legal ideology; in order to change the unilateral legal construction The ideology of the withdrawal of the subject, the lack of mutual exchange law subject between the subject and object of the situation, the formation of a dialectical relationship between the subject construction so that the subject of the construction of legal ideology and legal ideology, not only within the value subject of legal ideology construction of inward and outward construction of free will, outgoing value subject of legal ideology. Legal equality the critique of ideology still has its necessity in the ideological history of turn, generate a valid legal ideology critique depend on critical systems, and in the legal theory, critical legal practice at the same time to strengthen the legal ideology of the dominant power.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D90

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 付子堂;關(guān)于法律意識(shí)形態(tài)研究的斷想[J];法學(xué);2001年11期

2 喻中;關(guān)于法律意識(shí)形態(tài)的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];探索;2002年02期

3 高鴻鈞;;法律文化的語(yǔ)義、語(yǔ)境及其中國(guó)問(wèn)題[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2007年04期

4 強(qiáng)世功;邁向立法者的法理學(xué)——法律移植背景下對(duì)當(dāng)代法理學(xué)的反思[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年01期

本文編號(hào)：1646674