發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-28 16:40

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 337條款 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán) 貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 337條款原指美國(guó)《1930年關(guān)稅法》的第337條,其立法目的是管制外國(guó)廠商對(duì)美國(guó)傾銷(xiāo)產(chǎn)品以及商業(yè)壟斷等不公平的貿(mào)易行為,幾經(jīng)修改和完善,演化成以知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)為理由來(lái)規(guī)范外國(guó)廠商商業(yè)行為的法律規(guī)范。2008年對(duì)于全球經(jīng)濟(jì)無(wú)疑是災(zāi)難性的一年。美國(guó)次貸危機(jī)的擴(kuò)大,以及對(duì)金融衍生工具的管理不善,導(dǎo)致全球經(jīng)濟(jì)都陷入萎靡。美國(guó)作為世界經(jīng)濟(jì)強(qiáng)國(guó),此次金融危機(jī)的發(fā)源地,經(jīng)濟(jì)上也遭受了巨大的損失。可預(yù)見(jiàn)的是,為了振興國(guó)內(nèi)行業(yè),美國(guó)在國(guó)際貿(mào)易中對(duì)其國(guó)內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)的保護(hù)將會(huì)愈演愈烈,而337條款在近年來(lái)一直充當(dāng)著美國(guó)對(duì)外國(guó)企業(yè)進(jìn)行排擠的利器。隨著我國(guó)對(duì)美貿(mào)易順差的不斷擴(kuò)大,我國(guó)企業(yè)屢次遭到美國(guó)以337條款為由進(jìn)行的調(diào)查,我們完全有必要對(duì)美國(guó)337條款進(jìn)行分析,以期得出有益于我國(guó)出口型企業(yè)正常發(fā)展的合理建議。 本文共分三部分。第一個(gè)部分是基本介紹,對(duì)337條款作了簡(jiǎn)要的介紹和分析,闡述了337條款的由來(lái)及歷史沿革。 第二部分介紹了337條款與WTO規(guī)則等條例的比較。雖然從表面上看,337條款提供了行政程序法所設(shè)定的相應(yīng)程序保護(hù)條例,似乎不構(gòu)成不公平待遇,但是通過(guò)和其他條例內(nèi)容的細(xì)致比較,可以看出美國(guó)對(duì)進(jìn)口產(chǎn)品和國(guó)內(nèi)產(chǎn)品有著完全不同的待遇。 第三部分闡述了政府、行業(yè)協(xié)會(huì)、企業(yè)在應(yīng)對(duì)“337調(diào)查”時(shí)應(yīng)扮演的角色和應(yīng)采取的對(duì)策。
[Abstract]:Section 337 refers to Article 337 of the United States Customs tax Act of 1930, the legislative purpose of which is to regulate unfair trade practices of foreign manufacturers against dumping products and commercial monopolies in the United States, which have been revised and perfected several times. The 2008 is undoubtedly a disastrous year for the global economy. The expansion of the subprime mortgage crisis in the United States and the mismanagement of financial derivatives. The United States, as the world's economic powerhouse, has suffered enormous economic losses from the birthplace of the financial crisis. Predictably, in order to revitalize the domestic industry, The protection of domestic industries by the United States in international trade will be intensified, and Section 337 has been used as a sharp weapon for the United States to crowd out foreign enterprises in recent years. With the expansion of China's trade surplus with the United States, Chinese enterprises have been repeatedly investigated by the United States on the basis of Section 337. It is absolutely necessary for us to analyze Section 337 of the United States in order to draw reasonable suggestions that are beneficial to the normal development of export-oriented enterprises in China. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part is a basic introduction, a brief introduction and analysis of Section 337, the origin and historical evolution of Section 337. The second part introduces the comparison between Section 337 and regulations such as WTO rules. Although on the surface, Section 337 provides the corresponding procedural protection regulations established by the Administrative procedure Law, it does not seem to constitute unfair treatment. But through careful comparison with other regulations, we can see that the United States has a completely different treatment for imports and domestic products. The third part elaborates the government, the trade association, the enterprise should play the role and the countermeasure in the response "337 investigation".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D971.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;應(yīng)對(duì)美國(guó)337堿錳電池調(diào)查案中方企業(yè)大獲全勝[J];電池工業(yè);2004年05期

2 蒲華林;解析入世后中美貿(mào)易摩擦的新特點(diǎn)[J];對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào)實(shí)務(wù);2004年07期

3 李濤;“中國(guó)制造”的困境與出路——美國(guó)《貿(mào)易法》“337條款”知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)壁壘的挑戰(zhàn)[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2004年03期

4 ;淺議美國(guó)貿(mào)易法中的337條款[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;1996年02期

5 李懷政;我國(guó)三大貿(mào)易伙伴對(duì)華實(shí)施貿(mào)易救濟(jì)的比較與思考[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2004年04期

6 江琳;美國(guó)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟(337條款)及中國(guó)企業(yè)如何降低專利侵權(quán)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)[J];建設(shè)機(jī)械技術(shù)與管理;2003年12期

7 盧立巖;從“特別301條款”到“337條款”看中美知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)爭(zhēng)端的變化[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2004年07期

8 ;中國(guó)企業(yè)的專利危機(jī)[J];科學(xué)決策;2004年07期

9 陶婷芳,謝明磊;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán):國(guó)際商戰(zhàn)的利器——我國(guó)電池業(yè)應(yīng)對(duì)美國(guó)“337”調(diào)查勝訴案的啟示[J];上海商業(yè);2004年12期

10 沈偉,張寧;試論美國(guó)聯(lián)邦貿(mào)易法337條款的矛盾性——以世界貿(mào)易組織協(xié)議為線索[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1997年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 賈無(wú)志;美國(guó)外貿(mào)法的“337條款”與WTO法[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2004年

2 陳志雄;美國(guó)關(guān)稅法337條款之剖析[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2005年

3 潘長(zhǎng)河;論美國(guó)關(guān)稅法337條款制度的特殊貿(mào)易救濟(jì)性[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2005年

4 魯新剛;美國(guó)關(guān)稅法第337條款研究及其對(duì)中國(guó)的意義[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年

5 牟燕;美國(guó)337條款調(diào)查應(yīng)對(duì)策略之實(shí)證研究[D];廈門(mén)大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1548112