本文關(guān)鍵詞：走向認(rèn)知科學(xué)的法學(xué)研究——從法學(xué)與科學(xué)的關(guān)系切入　出處：《法學(xué)家》2015年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 法律認(rèn)知科學(xué) 法律社會(huì)科學(xué) 法學(xué) 科學(xué) 垂直整合

【摘要】：從知識(shí)史的角度看,法學(xué)與科學(xué)的交匯,呈現(xiàn)出法律社會(huì)科學(xué)與法律認(rèn)知科學(xué)兩波前后相繼的浪潮。這一趨勢(shì)促使法律學(xué)者重新反思法學(xué)與科學(xué)的關(guān)系。傳統(tǒng)法學(xué)基于"意義無(wú)涉"與"價(jià)值無(wú)涉"兩點(diǎn)理由,拒絕對(duì)法律問(wèn)題的科學(xué)研究,但這種自我辯護(hù)忽視了法律實(shí)踐的規(guī)約性特征和法律價(jià)值的科學(xué)基礎(chǔ)。法律認(rèn)知科學(xué)的溫和科學(xué)主義研究方式,從新的角度解決法學(xué)的固有問(wèn)題,有助于法律的工具價(jià)值與目的價(jià)值之實(shí)現(xiàn)。在垂直整合的框架中,認(rèn)知科學(xué)、社會(huì)科學(xué)和傳統(tǒng)法學(xué)各自占據(jù)不同的位置,以合理分工的方式推進(jìn)法學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)的發(fā)展,追求人類知識(shí)大匯聚的智識(shí)理想。引言過(guò)去幾百年間,科學(xué)確立了人類理智探索外在自然世界的最高典范。這種典范轉(zhuǎn)換,超越單一學(xué)科的邊界,推動(dòng)著人類知識(shí)的變革。和其它人文與社會(huì)學(xué)科相比,古老的法學(xué)似乎有著更強(qiáng)的保守氣質(zhì)。~①法學(xué),在其誕生之初就是職業(yè)性的知識(shí)體系,更多地包含著專家技藝與專門(mén)知識(shí)。作為職業(yè)性的實(shí)用知識(shí),法學(xué)并非典型的人文學(xué)問(wèn),并不直接關(guān)切人的處境(human condition);而在另
[Abstract]:From the point of view of the history of knowledge, the intersection of law and science. There are two successive waves of law, social science and legal cognitive science. This trend urges legal scholars to rethink the relationship between law and science. Traditional jurisprudence is based on "no meaning" and "no value". Two reasons. But this self-defense neglects the statutory characteristics of legal practice and the scientific basis of legal value, as well as the moderate scientism research method of legal cognitive science. Solving the inherent problems of law from a new angle is helpful to the realization of the instrumental value and the objective value of law. In the framework of vertical integration, cognitive science, social science and traditional law occupy different positions. To promote the development of legal science in a rational division of labor and to pursue the intellectual ideal of the great convergence of human knowledge. Science has established the highest model for human reason to explore the external natural world. This paradigm transformation transcends the boundary of a single discipline and promotes the transformation of human knowledge. Compared with other humanities and social disciplines. The ancient jurisprudence seems to have a stronger conservative temperament. At the beginning of its birth, it is a professional knowledge system, which contains more professional skills and expertise, as a professional practical knowledge. Law is not a typical humanism, and it is not directly concerned about the human condition. And in the other place,
【作者單位】： 浙江大學(xué)光華法學(xué)院;
【基金】：浙江省哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)規(guī)劃課題“認(rèn)知心理學(xué)視野中的法律推理研究”(14NDJC116YB)的資助
【分類號(hào)】：D90
【正文快照】： 引言過(guò)去幾百年間,科學(xué)確立了人類理智探索外在自然世界的最高典范。這種典范轉(zhuǎn)換,超越單一學(xué)科的邊界,推動(dòng)著人類知識(shí)的變革。和其它人文與社會(huì)學(xué)科相比,古老的法學(xué)似乎有著更強(qiáng)的保守氣質(zhì)。#174;法學(xué),在其誕生之初就是職業(yè)性的知識(shí)體系,更多地包含著專家技藝與專門(mén)知識(shí)。作

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 屈茂輝;匡凱;;傳統(tǒng)法學(xué)的幾何學(xué)范式論析[J];法學(xué)家;2014年03期

2 鄧矜婷;;新法律現(xiàn)實(shí)主義的最新發(fā)展與啟示[J];法學(xué)家;2014年04期

3 舒國(guó)瀅;尋訪法學(xué)的問(wèn)題立場(chǎng)——兼談“論題學(xué)法學(xué)”的思考方式[J];法學(xué)研究;2005年03期

4 王凌v，

本文編號(hào)：1429135