廣州市“積分入戶”政策研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-03-06 11:40
【摘要】：農(nóng)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移人口由于體制障礙無(wú)法享受到城市的市民待遇,是中國(guó)城市化進(jìn)程中出現(xiàn)的由二元經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)所帶來(lái)的問(wèn)題。新型城鎮(zhèn)化本質(zhì)是人的城鎮(zhèn)化,其基本任務(wù)是促進(jìn)農(nóng)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移人口市民化,最緊迫的任務(wù)是農(nóng)民工市民化。作為戶籍制度改革的創(chuàng)新實(shí)踐,廣州市的“積分入戶”政策引人關(guān)注。本論文試圖在梳理廣州市“積分入戶”政策的演進(jìn)過(guò)程基礎(chǔ)上,從來(lái)穗農(nóng)民工的角度分析廣州市“積分入戶”政策的實(shí)施效果,并提出相應(yīng)的改進(jìn)建議。廣州市在2010年啟動(dòng)“積分入戶”政策,2014年對(duì)“積分入戶”的條件和計(jì)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行了調(diào)整�！胺e分入戶”的實(shí)施,解決了部分外來(lái)務(wù)工者的戶籍問(wèn)題。截至2015年底大約1.7萬(wàn)外來(lái)務(wù)工者通過(guò)該政策獲得廣州市戶籍。問(wèn)卷調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)顯示,受訪者入戶意愿較強(qiáng)烈,但對(duì)“積分入戶”認(rèn)知度不高,普遍認(rèn)為通過(guò)積分制入戶的方式合理但具體入戶指標(biāo)設(shè)置應(yīng)該有所改進(jìn)。最希望通過(guò)“積分入戶”獲得的市民待遇依次為義務(wù)教育階段子女入讀公辦學(xué)校、醫(yī)療待遇、養(yǎng)老保障、申請(qǐng)廉租房資格和最低生活保障、購(gòu)買(mǎi)商品房資格、失業(yè)保障。廣州市“積分入戶”政策存在需要改進(jìn)的問(wèn)題。一是入戶指標(biāo)數(shù)量偏低,相對(duì)于數(shù)百萬(wàn)計(jì)的外來(lái)務(wù)工人員,廣州市每年4500個(gè)入戶指標(biāo)明顯滿足不了需要。二是計(jì)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)有待進(jìn)一步改進(jìn)。農(nóng)民工低學(xué)歷、少技能、低收入的群體特征導(dǎo)致積分偏低,考慮來(lái)穗工作年限和實(shí)際對(duì)城市發(fā)展的貢獻(xiàn)不夠。三是積分入戶申報(bào)程序繁雜,相關(guān)工作效率有待提高。四是政府在民生領(lǐng)域的財(cái)政投入和公共服務(wù)不足,社會(huì)管理效率低下。五是“積分入戶”政策宣傳力度不夠,外來(lái)務(wù)工人員申請(qǐng)入戶積極性不高。論文提出改進(jìn)“積分入戶”政策的建議。一是要關(guān)注農(nóng)民工群體的特征,應(yīng)充分考慮外來(lái)務(wù)工人員對(duì)城市發(fā)展的貢獻(xiàn),通過(guò)來(lái)穗工作年限等指標(biāo),優(yōu)化調(diào)整加分項(xiàng)權(quán)重。二是適度放寬入戶名額限制,提高與入戶管理配套的城市財(cái)政、管理部門(mén)、公共服務(wù)能力。三是處理好農(nóng)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移人口融入城市的問(wèn)題,平衡好減低入戶門(mén)檻與城市產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)的矛盾。四是簡(jiǎn)化“積分入戶”申請(qǐng)流程,縮減申請(qǐng)者的時(shí)間成本和經(jīng)濟(jì)成本。五是提高政策的宣傳力度,使其更好地為民所用。
[Abstract]:It is a problem brought by dualistic economic structure in the process of urbanization that agricultural transfer population is unable to enjoy the treatment of urban citizens because of institutional barriers. The essence of the new urbanization is the urbanization of human beings, and its basic task is to promote the urbanization of the population transferred by agriculture, and the most urgent task is the urbanization of migrant workers. As an innovative practice of the reform of household registration system, Guangzhou's "integral entry" policy attracts people's attention. On the basis of combing the evolution process of the "integral entry" policy in Guangzhou, this paper tries to analyze the implementation effect of the "integral entry" policy in Guangzhou from the perspective of migrant workers, and puts forward some suggestions for improvement. In 2010, Guangzhou started the "points-in-the-household" policy. In 2014, the conditions and scoring standards of "points-in-the-household" were adjusted. The implementation of "integral entry" solves the problem of household registration of some migrant workers. By the end of 2015, about 17000 migrant workers were registered in Guangzhou through the policy. The questionnaire data show that the interviewees' desire to enter the household is strong, but the recognition degree of "integral entering the household" is not high. It is generally believed that the way of entering the household through the system of points should be reasonable but the setting of the specific entry index should be improved. The citizens who most hope to get through the "points into the household" are compulsory education stage children enrolled in public schools, medical treatment, old-age security, application for low-rent housing qualifications and minimum living security, commercial housing qualifications, unemployment protection. There are some problems to be improved in the policy of "integration into the household" in Guangzhou. First, the number of household entry index is relatively low, compared with millions of migrant workers, Guangzhou city is obviously unable to meet the needs of 4500 household indicators per year. Second, the scoring standards need to be further improved. The group characteristics of low education, low skills and low income of migrant workers lead to low scores, and the years of working in Guangzhou and the actual contribution to urban development are not enough. Third, points to the household application procedures are complicated, related work efficiency needs to be improved. Fourth, the government's financial input and public service in the field of people's livelihood is insufficient, and the efficiency of social management is low. Fifth, the "points into the household" policy propaganda efforts are not enough, migrant workers apply for home enthusiasm is not high. The paper puts forward some suggestions to improve the "integral-in-the-household" policy. First, we should pay attention to the characteristics of migrant workers, fully consider the contribution of migrant workers to the development of the city, and optimize and adjust the add-on weight through the indicators such as the working years of the migrant workers in Guangzhou. Second, moderate relaxation of quota restrictions, and improve the capacity of urban finance, management departments and public services. The third is to deal with the problem of the integration of agricultural transfer population into the city, and to balance and reduce the contradiction between the threshold of entry and the upgrading of urban industry. Fourth, simplify the application process, reduce the time cost and economic cost of the applicant. Fifth, to enhance the publicity of the policy, so that it is better used by the people.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：D631.42
本文編號(hào)：2435491
[Abstract]:It is a problem brought by dualistic economic structure in the process of urbanization that agricultural transfer population is unable to enjoy the treatment of urban citizens because of institutional barriers. The essence of the new urbanization is the urbanization of human beings, and its basic task is to promote the urbanization of the population transferred by agriculture, and the most urgent task is the urbanization of migrant workers. As an innovative practice of the reform of household registration system, Guangzhou's "integral entry" policy attracts people's attention. On the basis of combing the evolution process of the "integral entry" policy in Guangzhou, this paper tries to analyze the implementation effect of the "integral entry" policy in Guangzhou from the perspective of migrant workers, and puts forward some suggestions for improvement. In 2010, Guangzhou started the "points-in-the-household" policy. In 2014, the conditions and scoring standards of "points-in-the-household" were adjusted. The implementation of "integral entry" solves the problem of household registration of some migrant workers. By the end of 2015, about 17000 migrant workers were registered in Guangzhou through the policy. The questionnaire data show that the interviewees' desire to enter the household is strong, but the recognition degree of "integral entering the household" is not high. It is generally believed that the way of entering the household through the system of points should be reasonable but the setting of the specific entry index should be improved. The citizens who most hope to get through the "points into the household" are compulsory education stage children enrolled in public schools, medical treatment, old-age security, application for low-rent housing qualifications and minimum living security, commercial housing qualifications, unemployment protection. There are some problems to be improved in the policy of "integration into the household" in Guangzhou. First, the number of household entry index is relatively low, compared with millions of migrant workers, Guangzhou city is obviously unable to meet the needs of 4500 household indicators per year. Second, the scoring standards need to be further improved. The group characteristics of low education, low skills and low income of migrant workers lead to low scores, and the years of working in Guangzhou and the actual contribution to urban development are not enough. Third, points to the household application procedures are complicated, related work efficiency needs to be improved. Fourth, the government's financial input and public service in the field of people's livelihood is insufficient, and the efficiency of social management is low. Fifth, the "points into the household" policy propaganda efforts are not enough, migrant workers apply for home enthusiasm is not high. The paper puts forward some suggestions to improve the "integral-in-the-household" policy. First, we should pay attention to the characteristics of migrant workers, fully consider the contribution of migrant workers to the development of the city, and optimize and adjust the add-on weight through the indicators such as the working years of the migrant workers in Guangzhou. Second, moderate relaxation of quota restrictions, and improve the capacity of urban finance, management departments and public services. The third is to deal with the problem of the integration of agricultural transfer population into the city, and to balance and reduce the contradiction between the threshold of entry and the upgrading of urban industry. Fourth, simplify the application process, reduce the time cost and economic cost of the applicant. Fifth, to enhance the publicity of the policy, so that it is better used by the people.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：D631.42
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 劉婷;李若衡;;從二元結(jié)構(gòu)的農(nóng)民工到完整的市民個(gè)體——略論農(nóng)民工積分入戶制度的意義與作用[J];特區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年10期
2 張繼良;蔣德峰;;近期農(nóng)民工市民化研究進(jìn)展及述評(píng)[J];無(wú)錫商業(yè)職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年05期
3 江立華;谷玉良;;城市流動(dòng)人口積分入戶政策——戶籍制度改革的“中山經(jīng)驗(yàn)”[J];社會(huì)建設(shè);2014年01期
4 傅晨;李飛武;;農(nóng)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移人口市民化背景下戶籍制度創(chuàng)新探索——廣東“農(nóng)民工積分入戶”研究[J];廣東社會(huì)科學(xué);2014年03期
5 辜勝阻;劉江日;曹譽(yù)波;;民間資本推進(jìn)城鎮(zhèn)化建設(shè)的問(wèn)題與對(duì)策[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2014年02期
6 吳殿廷;趙林;高文姬;;新型城鎮(zhèn)化的本質(zhì)特征及其評(píng)價(jià)[J];北華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年06期
7 唐曉陽(yáng);鄧衛(wèi)文;;廣東實(shí)施農(nóng)民工積分制入戶政策的效果評(píng)價(jià)及完善對(duì)策研究[J];廣東行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年06期
8 張占斌;;新型城鎮(zhèn)化的戰(zhàn)略意義和改革難題[J];國(guó)家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年01期
9 鄭梓楨;宋健;;戶籍改革新政與務(wù)實(shí)的城市化新路——以中山市流動(dòng)人口積分制管理為例[J];人口研究;2012年01期
10 黃祖輝;;戶籍改革謹(jǐn)防流于表面[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)營(yíng)管理;2011年06期
，本文編號(hào)：2435491
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fanzuizhian/2435491.html
最近更新
教材專著
