【摘要】：農民環(huán)境抗爭研究一直秉持"侵權—抗爭"的邏輯框架,但這一邏輯框架忽視了農民目標取向的多面性和抗爭事件的情境性。通過對大連"7·16"海洋溢油事件的研究我們發(fā)現(xiàn),農民環(huán)境抗爭事件中存在維權、謀利和正名三種目標指向,分別旨在維護自身合法權益、騙取賠償款以及為草根動員者自身恢復名譽。學界需要對"侵權—抗爭"的邏輯框架、弱者身份與弱者標簽以及媒體建構與科學精神展開反思。當前,環(huán)境抗爭出現(xiàn)了新態(tài)勢,我們稱之為混合型抗爭,包括維權、謀利、正名、泄憤和湊熱鬧等目標指向。社會的原子化和逐利心理、社會轉型加速期的社會矛盾和怨恨心理以及地方政府的"維穩(wěn)恐懼癥"是其產生的社會機制�；旌闲涂範幨菍Ξ斍翱範帉嵺`的理論歸納,有利于識別真正的受影響人群和區(qū)域,推動社會治理。
[Abstract]:The study of farmers' environmental resistance has always adhered to the logical framework of "tort-protest", but this logical framework ignores the multi-sided orientation of farmers' goal orientation and the situational nature of protest events. Through the study of Dalian's "716" marine oil spill incident, we find that there are three objectives in the environmental protest of farmers, namely, safeguarding their rights, seeking profits and correcting their names, respectively, in order to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests. Defrauding compensation and restoring the reputation of the grassroots mobilizer. Academic circles need to reflect on the logical framework of "Tort-protest", the identity of the weak and the label of the weak, as well as the construction of media and the spirit of science. At present, there is a new trend in environmental protest, which we call mixed protest, including rights protection, profit seeking, reputation, anger and commotion, and so on. The atomization of society and the psychology of pursuing profit, the social contradiction and resentment in the accelerating period of social transformation and the "stability phobia" of the local government are the social mechanism. The mixed resistance is a theoretical summary of the current struggle practice, which is helpful to identify the real affected groups and regions and to promote social governance.
【作者單位】： 河海大學社會學系、環(huán)境與社會研究中心;中國海洋大學法政學院社會學研究所;
【基金】：國家社科基金青年項目“海洋污染事件中漁民的環(huán)境抗爭研究”(13CSH039) 中央高校基本科研業(yè)務費專項基金“海洋環(huán)境問題的社會學研究”(2016B02314)資助
【分類號】：D631.43
，

本文編號：2385671