【摘要】： 人格尊嚴(yán)入憲即昭示了其作為人的基本權(quán)利的不可侵犯性,立足于主權(quán)在民的理念,現(xiàn)代憲法確認(rèn)個(gè)人尊嚴(yán),禁止用任何方法侵犯。但人格尊嚴(yán)立法在我國(guó)仍剛剛起步,它的出現(xiàn)基本國(guó)內(nèi)修憲人員對(duì)文化大革命期間大量的戕害人性侵害人權(quán)行為的反思結(jié)果,學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)其探討也就顯得不足,所以其并不是在完備的理論基礎(chǔ)的支持下出現(xiàn)的,而是具有鮮明的時(shí)代性,工具性。 長(zhǎng)期以來(lái),我國(guó)一直強(qiáng)調(diào)的是社會(huì)本位,權(quán)力制約權(quán)利的現(xiàn)象一直存在,而作為掌握大量公權(quán)力、與民眾最息息相關(guān)的部門(mén),行政機(jī)關(guān)依法行政尤其是依憲行政顯得尤為重要。本文從行政法,憲法等方面深入探討深圳福田警方“賣(mài)淫女示眾處理案”,對(duì)爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)逐一分析、探討。并在厘清爭(zhēng)議的同時(shí),對(duì)解決問(wèn)題的思路做一分析與反思。 本文主要分為四個(gè)部分： 第一節(jié),案情簡(jiǎn)介及爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)。介紹案例來(lái)源,基本情況,及各方爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)的梳理。第二節(jié)對(duì)爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)做一剖析,闡明“公開(kāi)”與“示眾”的區(qū)別與界限,闡述分析深圳警方執(zhí)法行為的正當(dāng)性與否。第三節(jié)論述的是人格與人格尊嚴(yán)的內(nèi)涵,得出結(jié)論深圳警方執(zhí)法行為侵犯了當(dāng)事人的人格尊嚴(yán)。并對(duì)如何實(shí)現(xiàn)被侵犯的權(quán)利之救濟(jì)進(jìn)行探討。第四節(jié),本部分主要對(duì)發(fā)生權(quán)力侵害權(quán)利時(shí),即本案例當(dāng)事人之人格尊嚴(yán)被侵害,而不能獲得有效救濟(jì)時(shí)所作出的制度上的反思與重構(gòu)建議。第五節(jié),針對(duì)頻頻發(fā)生的權(quán)力侵害權(quán)利的現(xiàn)象,說(shuō)明切實(shí)加強(qiáng)普通大眾尤其是公務(wù)員的憲法意識(shí)的重要性,以及實(shí)現(xiàn)途徑的簡(jiǎn)單探討。
[Abstract]:The entry of human dignity into the Constitution shows the inviolability of its basic rights as human beings, based on the concept of sovereignty in the people, and the modern constitution recognizes the dignity of the individual and prohibits any method from infringing on it. However, the legislation of human dignity is still in its infancy in our country, and the basic domestic constitutional revisers' reflection on the massive harm to human nature and human rights during the Cultural Revolution has led to a lack of discussion on it in academic circles. Therefore, it does not appear under the support of the complete theoretical basis, but has a distinct epoch and instrumentality. For a long time, our country has been emphasizing on the social standard, the phenomenon of power restricting the right has always existed, and as a department that grasps a large number of public power and is most closely related to the people, it is particularly important for administrative organs to administer according to law, especially according to the constitution. This paper probes deeply into Shenzhen Futian police's "case of dealing with prostituted women" from administrative law, constitution and so on, and analyzes and probes into the dispute focus one by one. And at the same time to clarify the dispute, to solve the problem to do an analysis and reflection. This article is divided into four parts: the first section, the brief case and the focus of controversy. Introduce the source of the case, the basic situation, and the focus of the parties to the dispute combing. The second section makes an analysis of the focus of the dispute, clarifies the distinction and boundary between "open" and "public", and analyzes the legitimacy of Shenzhen police's law enforcement. The third section discusses the connotation of personality and human dignity, and draws a conclusion that the law enforcement behavior of Shenzhen police infringes on the human dignity of the parties. And how to realize the relief of the violated rights are discussed. In the fourth section, this part is mainly about the reflection and reconstruction of the system when the right is infringed, that is, the human dignity of the party concerned is infringed, but the party can not obtain the effective remedy. The fifth section explains the importance of strengthening the constitutional consciousness of the general public, especially the civil servants, and discusses the ways to realize it.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D631.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 真田芳憲;鮑榮振;;人的尊嚴(yán)與人權(quán)[J];環(huán)球法律評(píng)論;1993年02期

2 李累;憲法上“人的尊嚴(yán)”[J];中山大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2137078