本文選題：城市　切入點(diǎn)：公共安全　出處：《天津師范大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 城市化是人類文明的體現(xiàn),也是社會(huì)發(fā)展的必然。城市作為人類社會(huì)物質(zhì)和精神財(cái)富積聚與傳播的中心,在社會(huì)工業(yè)化與現(xiàn)代化過(guò)程中發(fā)揮著非常重要作用,這是歷史發(fā)展的必然趨勢(shì)。但從安全角度來(lái)說(shuō),現(xiàn)代工業(yè)、新技術(shù)、信息產(chǎn)業(yè)的高速發(fā)展在為城市積累和創(chuàng)造財(cái)富的過(guò)程,實(shí)際上也是積聚風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的過(guò)程。城市化所帶來(lái)的各種潛在風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和災(zāi)難使城市公共安全問(wèn)題在社會(huì)發(fā)展中日益凸顯,社會(huì)對(duì)城市公共安全的需求也在快速增長(zhǎng)。如何應(yīng)對(duì)城市公共安全問(wèn)題的挑戰(zhàn),進(jìn)而更好地致力于安全城市的構(gòu)建,是當(dāng)前理論與實(shí)踐中的一個(gè)重大課題。尤其在城市公共安全管理中多元主體參與方面的研究還比較滯后、薄弱。研究城市公共安全管理多元參與不僅是實(shí)踐的需要,也是公共安全管理理論研究深入化的必然要求和體現(xiàn)。目前,我國(guó)城市公共安全管理的參與主體單一,多元主體參與機(jī)制、體制尚不健全。因此,本文擬借助風(fēng)險(xiǎn)理論、城市公共安全理論、多中心治理理論,結(jié)合目前我國(guó)的現(xiàn)實(shí)情況,綜合運(yùn)用各種分析和研究方法,對(duì)構(gòu)建一個(gè)政府主導(dǎo)的多元參與、分工協(xié)作、權(quán)責(zé)共擔(dān)的機(jī)制等一系列問(wèn)題進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)深入的探討,這對(duì)于拓寬相關(guān)的研究領(lǐng)域,深化、完善城市公共管理理論研究具有較大的理論意義。 在文章的構(gòu)思上,遵循探討理論基礎(chǔ)、研究現(xiàn)狀、發(fā)現(xiàn)問(wèn)題、解決問(wèn)題的思路,將文章分為五大部分進(jìn)行闡述,分別是：第一部分,緒論,指明本文的研究意義,并介紹了國(guó)內(nèi)外關(guān)于城市公共安全管理的研究現(xiàn)狀及本文所采用的方法；第二部分,對(duì)本文所涉及的相關(guān)理論“風(fēng)險(xiǎn)”、“城市公共安全管理”和“多中心治理”理論進(jìn)行論述,并對(duì)一些相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行界定；第三部分,對(duì)政府及其他主體在城市公共安全管理多元參與中的作用和互動(dòng)關(guān)系兩方面進(jìn)行探討和論述；第四部分,通過(guò)對(duì)目前我國(guó)城市公共安全管理中政府主導(dǎo)的多元參與現(xiàn)狀的認(rèn)識(shí)和探討,深刻全面分析了多元參與中政府和其他主體自身以及在共同參與管理時(shí)存在的問(wèn)題和原因,為提出對(duì)策做好了前提和準(zhǔn)備；第五部分,結(jié)合前一章的問(wèn)題分析,從進(jìn)一步增強(qiáng)政府的主導(dǎo)作用,培育和發(fā)揮非政府主體的參與作用,完善多元主體協(xié)作參與的法律、機(jī)制和組織體系三個(gè)方面,為我國(guó)城市公共安全管理多元參與提出了有針對(duì)性的對(duì)策,這是本文的重點(diǎn)部分。 本文可能的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)是針對(duì)目前我國(guó)城市公共安全管理中主體單一的現(xiàn)狀,提出必須建立一個(gè)以政府為主導(dǎo)、社會(huì)各方積極參與的多元參與模式,通過(guò)強(qiáng)化政府的主導(dǎo)作用以及培育和發(fā)揮非政府主體的參與作用,在相應(yīng)的法律法規(guī)、協(xié)作機(jī)制、組織體系不斷健全完善的基礎(chǔ)上探求政府、企業(yè)、非政府組織、公民、媒體等多元主體參與的對(duì)策。
[Abstract]:Urbanization is the embodiment of human civilization and the necessity of social development.As the center of the accumulation and dissemination of material and spiritual wealth in human society, cities play a very important role in the process of social industrialization and modernization, which is an inevitable trend of historical development.But from the security point of view, the rapid development of modern industry, new technology and information industry is the process of accumulating and creating wealth for cities, but also the process of accumulating risks.All kinds of potential risks and disasters brought by urbanization make the problem of urban public safety become increasingly prominent in the social development, and the demand for urban public safety is also growing rapidly.How to deal with the challenge of urban public safety and devote itself to the construction of safe city is an important subject in current theory and practice.Especially in the management of urban public security, the research on the participation of multiple subjects is lagging behind and weak.It is not only the need of practice to study the multiple participation in urban public security management, but also the inevitable requirement and embodiment of deepening the research of public safety management theory.At present, the participating subject of urban public safety management in our country is single, multi-subject participation mechanism, and the system is not perfect.Therefore, with the help of risk theory, urban public safety theory, multi-center governance theory, combined with the reality of our country, this paper synthetically applies various analysis and research methods to construct a government-led multiple participation, division of labor and cooperation.A series of problems, such as the mechanism of sharing rights and responsibilities, are discussed systematically and deeply, which is of great theoretical significance for broadening the relevant research fields, deepening and perfecting the theoretical study of urban public management.In the conception of the article, following the discussion of the theoretical basis, research status, problem finding, problem solving ideas, the article is divided into five parts to elaborate, respectively: the first part, introduction, pointing out the significance of this study,And introduced the domestic and foreign research status of urban public safety management and the methods adopted in this paper. Part two, the related theory "risk",The theories of "urban public safety management" and "multi-center governance" are discussed, and some related concepts are defined.The role and interaction of the government and other subjects in the multiple participation in urban public security management are discussed and discussed in the fourth part.Through the understanding and discussion of the current situation of government leading multiple participation in the management of urban public safety in our country, this paper deeply and comprehensively analyzes the problems and reasons existing in the process of government and other subjects participating in the pluralistic participation, as well as in the joint participation in the management.The fifth part, combined with the analysis of the problems in the previous chapter, further strengthens the leading role of the government, cultivates and brings into play the participation role of the non-government subject, and consummates the law of the cooperative participation of the multi-agent.Three aspects of mechanism and organization system, which is the key part of this paper, put forward targeted countermeasures for the multiple participation of urban public safety management in our country.The possible innovation of this paper is to aim at the single status quo of the main body in the management of urban public safety in our country at present, and put forward that we must establish a pluralistic participation mode which is led by the government and actively participated by all the social parties.Through strengthening the leading role of the government and cultivating and bringing into play the participation of the non-governmental main body, on the basis of the corresponding laws and regulations, the cooperation mechanism and the organization system, the government, the enterprise, the non-governmental organization, the citizen, the government, the enterprise, the non-governmental organization, the citizen, should be explored.Media and other multiple subjects to participate in the countermeasures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D631.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊藝文;關(guān)于城市公共安全管理的再思考[J];安全;2005年01期

2 劉承水;;關(guān)于城市公共安全管理的思考[J];城市問(wèn)題;2007年04期

3 董曉峰;王莉;游志遠(yuǎn);高峰;;城市公共安全研究綜述[J];城市問(wèn)題;2007年11期

4 馬德峰;安全城市:基于多維視野的考察[J];城市規(guī)劃學(xué)刊;2005年01期

5 淳于淼泠;日本政府危機(jī)管理的演變[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2004年07期

6 肖文濤;程宇;;構(gòu)筑地方政府公共安全管理體系的若干設(shè)想——兼論福建省的公共安全管理形勢(shì)[J];福建論壇(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年07期

7 蔡志強(qiáng);;社會(huì)危機(jī)治理的主體分析及系統(tǒng)建構(gòu)[J];福建行政學(xué)院福建經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

8 鄭振宇;;從應(yīng)急管理走向公共安全管理——應(yīng)急管理發(fā)展的必然趨勢(shì)[J];福建行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年06期

9 曹劍光;;地方政府公共安全治理研究——以福建省廈門(mén)市為例[J];福建行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

10 國(guó)務(wù)院發(fā)展研究中心課題組;孫曉郁;蔣省三;林家彬;吳慶;;我國(guó)應(yīng)急管理行政體制存在的問(wèn)題和完善思路[J];中國(guó)發(fā)展觀察;2008年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前5條

1 本報(bào)記者 董克偉;[N];中國(guó)改革報(bào);2004年

2 蘭欣;[N];中國(guó)改革報(bào);2006年

3 王pだ，

本文編號(hào)：1721809