本文選題：職務(wù)犯罪　切入點(diǎn)：機(jī)關(guān)工作人員　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 國(guó)家機(jī)關(guān)工作人員的職務(wù)犯罪對(duì)國(guó)家的政治建設(shè)、經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)具有較強(qiáng)的破壞作用。研究和健全職務(wù)犯罪的控制模式對(duì)預(yù)防職務(wù)犯罪、完善法治建設(shè)、提高黨的執(zhí)政能力與公信力具有積極的促進(jìn)作用。 文章分為以下幾個(gè)部分： 第一部分的內(nèi)容為機(jī)關(guān)工作人員職務(wù)犯罪控制的概述。一是職務(wù)犯罪控制的理論基礎(chǔ)。首先,規(guī)范機(jī)關(guān)工作人員職務(wù)行為是國(guó)家發(fā)展的需要。其次,控制職務(wù)犯罪的本質(zhì)是限制公權(quán)、保障民權(quán)。二是我國(guó)機(jī)關(guān)工作人員職務(wù)犯罪的現(xiàn)狀。我國(guó)機(jī)關(guān)工作人員的職務(wù)犯罪已經(jīng)嚴(yán)重破壞了政府公信力和執(zhí)政形象,損害了國(guó)家和民眾的大量合法權(quán)益,影響了黨的政治建設(shè)和法治建設(shè)。三是機(jī)關(guān)工作人員職務(wù)犯罪的特點(diǎn)。文章通過兩則案例詳細(xì)說明該類犯罪的特點(diǎn),機(jī)關(guān)工作人員職務(wù)犯罪均是通過公權(quán)力對(duì)公共管理資源的集中控制,在外部與內(nèi)部監(jiān)督形同虛設(shè)的情況下,違背公務(wù)道德和職務(wù)行為正當(dāng)性,以個(gè)人微弱的力量扭曲了國(guó)家強(qiáng)大的管理意志,用低廉的成本給國(guó)家和個(gè)人造成了巨大損失。四是世界各國(guó)對(duì)職務(wù)犯罪的控制模式。一些國(guó)家在反腐敗和懲治職務(wù)犯罪的實(shí)踐中積累了各具特色的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)。如道德教化、高薪養(yǎng)廉、法律嚴(yán)密、賦權(quán)懲治、政治透明、正本“浚源”等模式。注意多種措施的綜合運(yùn)用,正在成為當(dāng)今世界反貪浪潮中引人注目的一種有效對(duì)策而受到越來越多的國(guó)家的青睞,只有對(duì)職務(wù)犯罪進(jìn)行綜合治理,才能達(dá)到標(biāo)本兼治的目的。 第二部分的內(nèi)容為我國(guó)對(duì)職務(wù)犯罪控制的現(xiàn)狀。我國(guó)現(xiàn)有的職務(wù)犯罪控制模式中,道德教育和公眾監(jiān)督發(fā)揮的作用日益明顯,但是缺少道德法制化和信息公開化的前提。紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察和司法監(jiān)督是控制犯罪的根本保障,監(jiān)督權(quán)利的獨(dú)立行使與地方利益存在的矛盾仍需要進(jìn)一步解決。內(nèi)部監(jiān)督中厘清監(jiān)督者與被監(jiān)督者之間的關(guān)系并建立監(jiān)督者的權(quán)益保障機(jī)制是發(fā)揮內(nèi)部監(jiān)督優(yōu)勢(shì)的重要內(nèi)容。 第三部分的內(nèi)容為改善當(dāng)前職務(wù)犯罪控制模式。第一,解決瀆職犯罪輕刑化問題,增強(qiáng)對(duì)職務(wù)犯罪的震懾和懲治力度。第二,強(qiáng)化外部監(jiān)督組織和監(jiān)督權(quán)力的作用,依法對(duì)職務(wù)行為進(jìn)行控權(quán)監(jiān)督。第三,改善公共管理領(lǐng)域的內(nèi)部監(jiān)督,建立職務(wù)行為人的身份權(quán)益保障制度,注重職務(wù)行為的事中規(guī)范。第四,促進(jìn)信息公開化,建立職務(wù)行為監(jiān)督與職務(wù)犯罪偵查的信息體系,使職務(wù)犯罪控制模式具備靈敏的發(fā)現(xiàn)功能。第五,解決由少數(shù)機(jī)關(guān)工作人員決定大量社會(huì)公共管理資源分配的問題,改變資源分配方式。第六,加快機(jī)關(guān)工作人員道德法制化建設(shè),用法律強(qiáng)制方式在職務(wù)思維中植入公平正義、恪盡職守的道德理念。
[Abstract]:The official crime of state organ staff has a strong destructive effect on the political construction and economic construction of the country. The study and improvement of the control mode of the duty crime can prevent the duty crime and perfect the construction of the rule of law. Improving the party's ruling ability and credibility has a positive role in promoting. The article is divided into the following parts:. The content of the first part is an overview of the control of official crime. First, it is the need of the development of the country to regulate the duty behavior of the staff of the organ. Second, it is the theoretical basis of the control of the duty crime. The essence of controlling job-related crimes is to limit public rights and protect civil rights. Second, the present situation of official crimes committed by government functionaries in our country. The official crimes committed by government functionaries in our country have seriously damaged the credibility of the government and the image of the ruling government. It has damaged a large number of legitimate rights and interests of the state and the public, affected the party's political construction and the construction of the rule of law. Third, it is the characteristics of official crimes committed by government functionaries. The article explains in detail the characteristics of this kind of crimes through two cases. The crime of official duties of the staff of the organs is the centralized control of the public management resources through the public power, and violates the public morality and the legitimacy of the duty behavior under the circumstances of external and internal supervision. The weak power of the individual distorts the country's strong will to govern, The low cost has caused great losses to countries and individuals. Fourth, the modes of controlling job-related crimes in various countries in the world. Some countries have accumulated their own unique successful experiences in the practice of fighting corruption and punishing job-related crimes, such as moral enlightenment. High pay, strict law, power and punishment, political transparency, original "dredging" and other models. Pay attention to the comprehensive use of various measures, Nowadays, it is becoming an effective countermeasure in the wave of anti-corruption in the world and is favored by more and more countries. Only by comprehensively controlling the crime of duty can we achieve the goal of treating both symptoms and symptoms. The second part is about the present situation of the control of duty crime in our country. In the existing duty crime control mode of our country, the role of moral education and public supervision is becoming more and more obvious. However, it lacks the premise of moral legalization and openness of information. Discipline inspection, supervision and judicial supervision are the fundamental guarantees for crime control. The contradiction between the independent exercise of supervisory rights and the local interests still needs to be further solved. In internal supervision, it is important to clarify the relationship between supervisors and supervisors and to establish the mechanism of safeguarding the rights and interests of supervisors. The content of the third part is to improve the current control mode of duty crime. First, to solve the problem of light punishment of dereliction of duty crime, to strengthen the deterrent and punishment of duty crime. Second, to strengthen the role of external supervision organization and supervision power. Third, to improve the internal supervision in the field of public administration, to establish the system of safeguarding the identity and rights and interests of the duty doers, and to lay stress on the standardization of the duties. Fourth, to promote the publicity of information. Establish the information system of duty behavior supervision and duty crime investigation, make the control mode of duty crime have sensitive discovery function. Fifth, solve the problem that a small number of agency staff decide the allocation of a large number of social public management resources. The sixth is to speed up the construction of the moral legalization of the staff of the organ, to imbue the fair and just in the thinking of duty with the compulsory way of law, and to fulfill the moral idea of due diligence.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D917.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 彭波;趙光輝;李晉紅;;從公共權(quán)力控制和運(yùn)用角度論共產(chǎn)黨的執(zhí)政規(guī)律[J];重慶電子工程職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

2 周洪波;沉默權(quán)問題:超越兩種理路之新說[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年05期

3 侯健;三種權(quán)力制約機(jī)制及其比較[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年03期

4 李瑞昌;關(guān)于我國(guó)公務(wù)員身份保障的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];廣東行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年06期

5 謝志巋;協(xié)調(diào)中央與地方關(guān)系需要兩次分權(quán)──對(duì)協(xié)調(diào)中央與地方關(guān)系的一項(xiàng)新的探索[J];江海學(xué)刊;1998年01期

6 楊小軍;;政府信息公開范圍若干法律問題[J];江蘇行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

7 蔡樂渭;;論我國(guó)行政監(jiān)察制度的改革[J];江西行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

8 謝薇,胡成;法律控制權(quán)力的理論邏輯及實(shí)現(xiàn)途徑[J];理論月刊;2004年04期

9 車承軍;簡(jiǎn)論職務(wù)犯罪控制的幾種模式[J];求是學(xué)刊;2001年05期

10 林肅婭;“入世”與貪利型職務(wù)犯罪控制[J];四川師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孟祥鋒;法律控權(quán)論[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 范廣垠;治理腐敗——制度他律與道德自律的非均衡性[D];蘇州大學(xué);2003年

2 劉曉輝;職務(wù)犯罪輕刑化的刑法反思[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年

3 胡軍;規(guī)范行政權(quán)力運(yùn)行與反腐敗研究[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1697924