本文選題：民事　切入點(diǎn)：司法鑒定　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 本文首先分析了在民事訴訟中司法鑒定的啟動(dòng)程序中有關(guān)英美法系國(guó)家與大陸法系國(guó)家的異同以及兩者的利弊后,分析評(píng)價(jià)我國(guó)司法鑒定啟動(dòng)程序并提出我國(guó)司法鑒定啟動(dòng)程序的構(gòu)建模式:在民事案件中,只要當(dāng)事人提出鑒定申請(qǐng)不是故意拖延時(shí)間且是查明案件事實(shí)所必須的情況下,法院應(yīng)當(dāng)允許當(dāng)事人鑒定的請(qǐng)求,賦予當(dāng)事人司法鑒定的啟動(dòng)權(quán),但同時(shí)法院應(yīng)該適當(dāng)?shù)囊?guī)制當(dāng)事人的鑒定權(quán),以防止鑒定權(quán)的濫用,導(dǎo)致可能發(fā)生的司法資源浪費(fèi),并建立相應(yīng)的救濟(jì)程序;其次、分析我國(guó)現(xiàn)行法律體系中有關(guān)司法鑒定的實(shí)施程序、質(zhì)證程序、認(rèn)證程序等內(nèi)容,指出目前有關(guān)民事訴訟司法鑒定的程序規(guī)定的具體內(nèi)容、存在的問(wèn)題,詳細(xì)闡述司法鑒定程序中有關(guān)實(shí)施程序的司法鑒定的主體、司法鑒定材料的篩選提供、鑒定材料的保全、司法鑒定的實(shí)施;重點(diǎn)分析論證司法鑒定結(jié)論質(zhì)證的必要性、程序要求、質(zhì)證的方式及內(nèi)容,通過(guò)中外有關(guān)鑒定人出庭作證、專家輔助人制度的分析比較,倡導(dǎo)在司法鑒定意見(jiàn)書(shū)質(zhì)證程序中貫徹堅(jiān)持鑒定人出庭作證原則的基礎(chǔ)之上,建立健全我國(guó)專家輔助人制度,以此提高訴訟當(dāng)事人對(duì)鑒定意見(jiàn)書(shū)的質(zhì)證質(zhì)量;通過(guò)對(duì)司法鑒定意見(jiàn)書(shū)合法性、客觀性、關(guān)聯(lián)性的審查,并綜合案件其它證據(jù),特別是經(jīng)過(guò)法庭質(zhì)證已經(jīng)查證屬實(shí)的證據(jù)材料,正確認(rèn)定司法鑒定意見(jiàn)書(shū)的證據(jù)效力;這部分內(nèi)容還參照某些地方審判機(jī)關(guān)針對(duì)司法鑒定程序方面所作出了有利的探索經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出我國(guó)民事司法鑒定在上述程序制度設(shè)置的建議;最后、在分析重復(fù)鑒定所產(chǎn)生的原因、危害及重新鑒定的主要情形后,根據(jù)現(xiàn)有法律規(guī)定歸納總結(jié)重新鑒定的主體及有關(guān)申請(qǐng)重新鑒定的期限,并針對(duì)有關(guān)司法實(shí)踐中的問(wèn)題提出相應(yīng)處理意見(jiàn);此后結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐,用比較詳盡的資料和翔實(shí)案件分析,詳細(xì)分析論證在民事訴訟中應(yīng)當(dāng)依照《最高人民法院關(guān)于民事訴訟證據(jù)的若干規(guī)定》第二十七條、第二十八條之規(guī)定,嚴(yán)格審查把握重新鑒定的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),要建立健全嚴(yán)格的重新鑒定審查制度,設(shè)立補(bǔ)充鑒定制度,避免重復(fù)鑒定,樹(shù)立司法權(quán)威,真正讓司法鑒定成為幫助法官確定案件事實(shí)的重要手段。
[Abstract]:This paper first analyzes the civil lawsuit in judicial identification startup in the countries of Anglo American law system and continental law countries and the similarities and differences of both advantages and disadvantages, analysis and evaluation of judicial appraisal in our country and put forward the construction mode to start the program starting procedure of judicial appraisal in our country: in civil cases, as long as the parties make appraisal application not delay time is the case must be identified and the facts of the case, the court shall allow the parties to identify the request, give the parties the right to initiate judicial expertise, but at the same time, the court should identify the appropriate right regulation of the parties, to prevent the abuse of the right identification, resulting in a waste of judicial resources may occur, and establish the corresponding relief procedure; secondly, analysis of the implementation procedures for judicial authentication in China's current legal system, quality certification procedures, certification procedures and other content, pointed out that the current relevant civil litigation Division The specific content of identification procedures, existing problems, elaborates the subject of judicial identification on the implementation procedure of the judicial identification procedures in the screening of forensic materials, identification of material preservation, implementation of judicial authentication; judicial expertise. Focus on the analysis of necessity, the quality examination of the program requirements, and content quality permits, by Chinese and foreign relevant expert testimony, a comparative analysis of the expert assistant system, carry out advocacy adhere to the expert testimony on the principle of judicial authentication opinions on cross examination procedures, establishing and perfecting the expert assistant system, in order to improve the litigants for the identification of opinion testimony by quality; on the judicial authentication opinions legitimacy, objectivity, relevance and comprehensive review, the case of other evidence, especially after the court testimony has been verified according to the material, is confirmed The effectiveness of certain forensic opinion evidence; this part also refer to some local judicial organs according to the procedure of judicial appraisal has made beneficial exploration experience, put forward our country civil judicial appraisal system is suggested in the program; finally, in the analysis of the reasons caused by repeated identification and re identification, the main harm after according to the existing laws and regulations, the main summary of re identification and the related application re appraisal period, and put forward the corresponding opinion on the relevant problems in the judicial practice; then combined with judicial practice, with detailed data and detailed case analysis, detailed analysis and demonstration should be in accordance with the "Supreme People's Court on evidence in civil proceedings a number of provisions twenty-seventh in civil litigation, the provisions of article twenty-eighth, strictly examine the grasp re identification standards, to establish and improve the strict We should re identify the review system, set up a supplementary identification system, avoid duplication of appraisal, establish judicial authority, and truly make forensic expertise an important means to help judges determine the facts of a case.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D918.9

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 朱福高;人身?yè)p害賠償訴訟中司法鑒定調(diào)查分析[D];蘭州大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1597831