【摘要】：破產(chǎn)重整制度是為克服和解制度的消極之處而發(fā)展起來(lái)的一種新型的、更為有效的破產(chǎn)預(yù)防制度,重視并強(qiáng)化對(duì)破產(chǎn)重整制度的規(guī)定是現(xiàn)代各國(guó)破產(chǎn)法呈現(xiàn)出來(lái)的普遍特征。我國(guó)于2007年6月1日開始實(shí)施的《企業(yè)破產(chǎn)法》首次引入了重整制度,與和解、清算制度構(gòu)成了完整的破產(chǎn)法律體系。由于破產(chǎn)法實(shí)施時(shí)間較短,學(xué)者大多從我國(guó)破產(chǎn)法重整制度架構(gòu)的角度進(jìn)行研究。本文著重通過(guò)美國(guó)破產(chǎn)重整制度的介紹以及對(duì)中美破產(chǎn)重整制度的比較,總結(jié)我國(guó)破產(chǎn)重整制度的特點(diǎn),嘗試從破產(chǎn)重整的功能價(jià)值和國(guó)家法律環(huán)境等角度進(jìn)行分析,結(jié)合破產(chǎn)法實(shí)施中的重整案例,以比較和實(shí)證的方法分析我國(guó)破產(chǎn)重整制度存在的缺陷并提出完善措施。 文章主要包括五個(gè)部分的內(nèi)容：一是關(guān)于破產(chǎn)重整制度概述。破產(chǎn)重整制度具有目標(biāo)多元化、適用范圍狹窄、重整原因?qū)捤�、申�?qǐng)主體廣泛、擔(dān)保物權(quán)的行使受到限制、重整程序具有優(yōu)先性的特征。認(rèn)真分析和研究這些相同和不同會(huì)有助于我們?nèi)鏈?zhǔn)確地理解和掌握破產(chǎn)重整制度的本質(zhì)。二是簡(jiǎn)單介紹了中美破產(chǎn)重整制度的發(fā)展歷史并做簡(jiǎn)單的評(píng)述。三是沿著重整程序的啟動(dòng),對(duì)中美重整制度的啟動(dòng)作重點(diǎn)對(duì)比研究。四是對(duì)中美破產(chǎn)重整制度中自動(dòng)凍結(jié)制度和公司控制權(quán)制度進(jìn)行了比較研究,以重整制度中不同主體的法律地位和權(quán)利義務(wù)關(guān)系為切入點(diǎn),對(duì)我國(guó)重整制度的重點(diǎn)內(nèi)容進(jìn)行論述,通過(guò)與美國(guó)重整制度的對(duì)比,分析我國(guó)新企業(yè)破產(chǎn)法重整制度的特點(diǎn)及原因。最后,筆者主要闡述了重整計(jì)劃,對(duì)重整計(jì)劃的制定人、執(zhí)行人、監(jiān)督人的人選與制度設(shè)計(jì),計(jì)劃的內(nèi)容與其他相關(guān)法律的協(xié)調(diào),表決分組和表決通過(guò)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)問(wèn)題,法院批準(zhǔn)計(jì)劃之前的審查內(nèi)容以及計(jì)劃執(zhí)行中的情勢(shì)變更等問(wèn)題提出了完善建議。
[Abstract]:Bankruptcy reorganization system is a new and more effective bankruptcy prevention system developed to overcome the negativity of reconciliation system. It is a common feature of modern bankruptcy law to attach importance to and strengthen the provisions of bankruptcy reorganization system. The Enterprise bankruptcy Law, which began to be implemented on June 1, 2007, has introduced the reorganization system for the first time, and the settlement system and the liquidation system have formed a complete bankruptcy legal system. Because of the short implementation time of bankruptcy law, most scholars study it from the point of view of the reorganization system structure of bankruptcy law in our country. Through the introduction of the bankruptcy reorganization system in the United States and the comparison between China and the United States, this paper summarizes the characteristics of the bankruptcy reorganization system in China, tries to analyze the functional value of the bankruptcy reorganization system and the national legal environment, combined with the reorganization cases in the implementation of the bankruptcy law, analyzes the defects of the bankruptcy reorganization system in China by means of comparison and demonstration, and puts forward some perfect measures. The article mainly includes five parts: first, an overview of the bankruptcy reorganization system. The bankruptcy reorganization system has the characteristics of diversified objectives, narrow scope of application, loose reasons for reorganization, wide scope of application, restriction of the exercise of real right of security, and priority of reorganization procedure. Careful analysis and study of these similarities and differences will help us to fully and accurately understand and grasp the essence of bankruptcy reorganization system. Second, it briefly introduces the development history of bankruptcy reorganization system in China and the United States and makes a brief comment. The third is to make a comparative study of the start-up of the reorganization system between China and the United States along the start of the reorganization procedure. Fourth, this paper makes a comparative study on the automatic freezing system and the corporate control system in the bankruptcy reorganization system between China and the United States. Taking the legal status and rights and obligations of different subjects in the reorganization system as the starting point, this paper discusses the key contents of the reorganization system in China, and analyzes the characteristics and reasons of the reorganization system of the new enterprise bankruptcy law in China through the comparison with the reorganization system in the United States. Finally, the author mainly expounds the reorganization plan, and puts forward some suggestions on the selection and system design of the reorganization plan maker, executor, supervisor, the coordination of the contents of the plan with other relevant laws, the voting division and the standard of voting, the review content before the court approves the plan and the change of situation in the implementation of the plan.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.92;D971.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李麗;;中美破產(chǎn)重整制度的法律問(wèn)題比較研究[J];山西廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期

2 朱明陽(yáng);黃華星;;有擔(dān)保債權(quán)在企業(yè)破產(chǎn)重整中的利益平衡[J];成都行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年03期

3 趙冰;;論利益相關(guān)者對(duì)破產(chǎn)重整企業(yè)承擔(dān)社會(huì)責(zé)任的方式[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年24期

4 沈田豐;呂卿;;三個(gè)破產(chǎn)案的三重精妙[J];中國(guó)律師;2010年07期

5 張世君;;企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任理論與破產(chǎn)重整立法理念[J];中國(guó)商法年刊;2009年00期

6 李少波;;重整,企業(yè)自我救治的一劑良藥[J];法人;2011年09期

7 趙泓任;;企業(yè)破產(chǎn)重整中法院的管理調(diào)控功能[J];中國(guó)律師;2010年04期

8 張慧鵬;何娟;梁錦榮;林建中;;廣東中谷糖業(yè)涅i彌厴荹J];中國(guó)審判;2010年11期

9 王海明;;中W破u#法曑於企im重生Qiz.制度的移植，

本文編號(hào)：2510185