【摘要】：法律程式化語言遍及立法語言、司法語言及執(zhí)法語言,是法律語言的重要組成部分。法律程式化語言在法律立法實踐及司法實踐中有著非常重要的作用,通過對法律程式化語言的研究,能夠加強法律工作者對法律程式化語言的認識,并引起更多法律工作者參與到法律程式化語言的研究中,促進法律工作者自覺地應用法律程式化語言。法律程式化語言是語言在法律活動的應用中,形成的規(guī)范、嚴謹、單一的詞匯、句式結構等預制的或半預制的表達模式。法律程式化語言的形成具有不同的模式,根據(jù)法律程式語在歷史文獻及在現(xiàn)代法律活動各方面的運用情況,可以將法律程式語的形成總結為五種模式,它們分別是演化模式、案例模式、轉(zhuǎn)換模式、邏輯模式及普適模式。法律程式化語言在法律活動中的運用具有重要的語用價值和實踐功能,表現(xiàn)為法律程式語的簡潔性、節(jié)奏性、規(guī)范性及其對法律語境的提示功能,對法律威嚴的維護功能。法律程式化語言還表現(xiàn)出了其在運用上的順應性和生成性的特點。法律程式語在立法語篇的賦予權利和規(guī)定義務的表述中表現(xiàn)出顯性和規(guī)約性兩個方面。在對顯性程式語及規(guī)約性程式語在10部法律的運用分布統(tǒng)計中得出規(guī)約性程式的使用頻率高于顯性程式語的使用頻率,規(guī)定義務的程式語使用頻率高于賦予權利的程式語的使用頻率。法律程式語不論在賦予權利和規(guī)定義務的表述中或在顯性和規(guī)約性的表述中都會使用一些意思相近或者相似的程式語。通過對這些語義相近或相似的程式語的辨析可以促進立法工作者準確地選用法律程式語,也可以促進司法工作者對法律程式語的正確理解與辨析。
[Abstract]:Legal programming language is an important part of legal language, which is widely used in legislative language, judicial language and law enforcement language. Legal stylized language plays a very important role in the practice of legal legislation and judicial practice. Through the study of legal stylized language, we can strengthen the understanding of legal stylized language among legal workers. And cause more legal workers to participate in the study of legal stylized language, and promote legal practitioners to use legal stylized language consciously. Legal stylized language is a prefabricated or semi-prefabricated mode of expression formed by language in the application of legal activities, such as normative, rigorous, single vocabulary, sentence structure and so on. According to the application of legal programming language in historical documents and in modern legal activities, the formation of legal programming language can be summarized into five models, which are evolutionary models, respectively. Case model, transition pattern, logical model and universal model. The application of legal stylized language in legal activities has important pragmatic value and practical function, which is manifested in the simplicity, rhythmicity, standardization and prompt function of legal context, as well as the function of maintaining legal majesty. Legal stylized language also shows the characteristics of adaptability and generation in its application. The legal programming language shows two aspects: explicit and prescriptive in the expression of the rights and the prescribed obligations in the legislative discourse. In the distribution statistics of the application of explicit programming language and prescriptive programming language in 10 laws, it is found that the use frequency of prescriptive program is higher than that of explicit programming language. The obligatory programming language is used more frequently than the rights-conferred programming language. Legal programming language uses similar or similar expressions, whether in the expression of rights and obligations or in explicit and prescriptive expressions. The analysis of these similar or similar procedural languages can promote the legislative workers to choose the legal programming language accurately, and it can also promote the judicial workers to understand and differentiate the legal programming language correctly.
【作者單位】： 江西農(nóng)業(yè)大學法律語言學研究所;
【分類號】：D90-055

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前5條

1 張新紅;漢語立法語篇的言語行為分析[J];現(xiàn)代外語;2000年03期

2 陳炯;論立法語言功能域[J];畢節(jié)師范高等�？茖W校學報;2004年03期

3 陳炯;論立法語言的風格特征[J];畢節(jié)師范高等專科學校學報;2005年01期

4 劉仕明;第二語言習得中的程式語研究[J];天津外國語學院學報;2002年02期

5 陳炯;二十多年來中國法律語言研究評述[J];畢節(jié)師范高等�？茖W校學報;2004年01期

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 冀婷婷;法律語言模糊性的語義學和語用學視角研究[D];華中師范大學;2007年

2 張忠梅;程式化語言的順應論探究[D];西南大學;2006年

【共引文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 馬雯;論英語立法語言模糊詞語的運用及不可消除性[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2004年04期

2 王剛;李巖;;關于國際法學科開設英漢雙語教學的思考[J];安康師專學報;2006年03期

3 郭自力,李榮;刑事立法語言的立場[J];北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2004年02期

4 陳炯;論幾種表達法律規(guī)范的特殊句式[J];畢節(jié)師范高等專科學校學報;2003年04期

5 陳炯;論立法語言的風格特征[J];畢節(jié)師范高等�？茖W校學報;2005年01期

6 譚s，

本文編號：2442983