立法資料在法律解釋中的運(yùn)用
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-17 17:08
【摘要】：立法資料是伴隨著法律文本而產(chǎn)生的,與法律文本的聯(lián)系非常緊密。立法資料是解釋法律文本的重要依據(jù),運(yùn)用立法資料進(jìn)行解釋有助于發(fā)現(xiàn)立法意圖,準(zhǔn)確的闡釋法律規(guī)定的含義,將法律與個(gè)案相結(jié)合,體現(xiàn)法律的權(quán)威性、穩(wěn)定性和公平性。與此同時(shí),當(dāng)前對(duì)立法資料在法律解釋中的運(yùn)用還沒有較為系統(tǒng)的研究。但在司法實(shí)踐中,當(dāng)法律規(guī)定有歧義或不明確,或字面含義將導(dǎo)致荒謬時(shí),法官會(huì)將目光轉(zhuǎn)向立法資料以尋求合理的解釋。所以研究立法資料的內(nèi)容,探討立法資料在法律解釋中的運(yùn)用是非常必要的。 文章共分為六部分。第一部分為“提出問題”。本部分闡述了論文的研究背景、研究意義和研究方法。剖析立法資料在法律解釋中的重要作用。立法資料與法律文本相伴而生,是探求法律含義的輔助資料。目前國內(nèi)學(xué)界對(duì)立法資料研究較少。英美等國家對(duì)立法資料研究已初成體系,值得我們借鑒學(xué)習(xí)。通過以上分析明確本文研究意義,提出文章寫作思路與方法。 第二部分探討立法資料的概念。首先分析學(xué)界中諸如立法史、立法準(zhǔn)備資料等類似用語,確定本文研究主題“立法資料”一詞。然后通過對(duì)比分析中外對(duì)立法資料內(nèi)涵與外延的不同定義,確定本文中立法資料的內(nèi)容；并在中國語境下闡述運(yùn)用立法資料的目的與立法資料的具體內(nèi)容。 第三部分研究立法資料在國外法律解釋中的運(yùn)用。本部分以英國、美國、澳大利亞與法國、德國、意大利為例,研究兩大法系困家對(duì)立法資料在法律解釋中的運(yùn)用的不同態(tài)度、要求與方法,總結(jié)國外經(jīng)驗(yàn),為立法資料在我國法律解釋中的運(yùn)用提供參考和借鑒。 第四部分分析立法資料在我國法律解釋中的運(yùn)用。以學(xué)界已有研究為基礎(chǔ),吸收國外經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出立法資料在我國法律解釋中運(yùn)用的具體要求,為司法中合理、準(zhǔn)確運(yùn)用立法資料明確運(yùn)用前提條件。同時(shí)根據(jù)我國不同的立法資料具體內(nèi)容,分別結(jié)合案例提出相關(guān)立法資料的運(yùn)用方法 第五部分針對(duì)學(xué)界對(duì)立法資料在法律解釋中的運(yùn)用的質(zhì)疑進(jìn)行分析,并進(jìn)行回應(yīng),明確在法律解釋中運(yùn)用立法資料的合法性、合理性,論證運(yùn)用立法資料進(jìn)行法律解釋的合法地位。 第六部分總結(jié)立法資料在法律解釋中的重要作用,明確立法資料作為法律解釋的主要依據(jù)的地位。在司法實(shí)踐中遵循運(yùn)用立法資料的要求和方法,解釋法律規(guī)定,在個(gè)案中準(zhǔn)確理解立法意圖,維護(hù)法律穩(wěn)定、公平與正義。
[Abstract]:Legislative material is produced with the legal text, and the legal text is closely linked. Legislative data is an important basis for interpretation of legal texts. It is helpful to discover legislative intent, accurately explain the meaning of legal provisions, combine law with individual cases, and reflect the authority, stability and fairness of law. At the same time, there is no systematic study on the application of legislative data in legal interpretation. However, in judicial practice, when the legal provisions are ambiguous or ambiguous, or the literal meaning will lead to absurdity, the judge will turn his eyes to the legislative information in order to seek a reasonable interpretation. Therefore, it is necessary to study the content of legislative materials and explore the application of legislative materials in legal interpretation. The article is divided into six parts. The first part is "asking questions". This part describes the research background, research significance and research methods. Analysis of the important role of legislative materials in legal interpretation. Legislative materials and legal texts are concomitant with each other, and are auxiliary materials to explore the meaning of law. At present, there is little research on the legislative materials in domestic academic circles. Anglo-American countries and other countries on the study of legislative data has become a system, we should learn from. Through the above analysis to clarify the significance of this study, put forward writing ideas and methods. The second part discusses the concept of legislative information. First of all, it analyzes the similar terms in the academic circles, such as legislative history and legislative preparatory materials, and determines the term "legislative material", which is the subject of this paper. Then through the comparative analysis of the different definitions of the connotation and extension of the legislative material in China and foreign countries, the content of the legislative material in this paper is determined, and the purpose of using the legislative material and the concrete content of the legislative material are expounded in the Chinese context. The third part studies the application of legislative materials in foreign legal interpretation. This part takes England, the United States, Australia and France, Germany and Italy as examples to study the different attitudes, requirements and methods of the application of legislative materials to the legal interpretation, and to sum up the experience of foreign countries. To provide reference and reference for the application of legislative materials in legal interpretation of our country. The fourth part analyzes the application of legislative data in our legal interpretation. On the basis of existing academic research and absorbing foreign experience, the author puts forward the specific requirements for the application of legislative materials in the interpretation of laws in our country, which is a prerequisite for the rational and accurate use of legislative data in the administration of justice. At the same time, according to the specific content of different legislative materials in our country, the application method of relevant legislative data is put forward in combination with the case. The fifth part analyzes and responds to the doubts of the use of legislative data in the legal interpretation in academic circles. The legitimacy and rationality of the application of legislative materials in legal interpretation are clarified, and the legal status of using legislative materials in legal interpretation is demonstrated. The sixth part summarizes the important role of legislative materials in legal interpretation, and clarifies the position of legislative materials as the main basis of legal interpretation. In the judicial practice, we should follow the requirements and methods of using the legislative materials, explain the legal provisions, understand the legislative intention accurately in the case, and maintain the legal stability, fairness and justice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D901
本文編號(hào)：2338517
[Abstract]:Legislative material is produced with the legal text, and the legal text is closely linked. Legislative data is an important basis for interpretation of legal texts. It is helpful to discover legislative intent, accurately explain the meaning of legal provisions, combine law with individual cases, and reflect the authority, stability and fairness of law. At the same time, there is no systematic study on the application of legislative data in legal interpretation. However, in judicial practice, when the legal provisions are ambiguous or ambiguous, or the literal meaning will lead to absurdity, the judge will turn his eyes to the legislative information in order to seek a reasonable interpretation. Therefore, it is necessary to study the content of legislative materials and explore the application of legislative materials in legal interpretation. The article is divided into six parts. The first part is "asking questions". This part describes the research background, research significance and research methods. Analysis of the important role of legislative materials in legal interpretation. Legislative materials and legal texts are concomitant with each other, and are auxiliary materials to explore the meaning of law. At present, there is little research on the legislative materials in domestic academic circles. Anglo-American countries and other countries on the study of legislative data has become a system, we should learn from. Through the above analysis to clarify the significance of this study, put forward writing ideas and methods. The second part discusses the concept of legislative information. First of all, it analyzes the similar terms in the academic circles, such as legislative history and legislative preparatory materials, and determines the term "legislative material", which is the subject of this paper. Then through the comparative analysis of the different definitions of the connotation and extension of the legislative material in China and foreign countries, the content of the legislative material in this paper is determined, and the purpose of using the legislative material and the concrete content of the legislative material are expounded in the Chinese context. The third part studies the application of legislative materials in foreign legal interpretation. This part takes England, the United States, Australia and France, Germany and Italy as examples to study the different attitudes, requirements and methods of the application of legislative materials to the legal interpretation, and to sum up the experience of foreign countries. To provide reference and reference for the application of legislative materials in legal interpretation of our country. The fourth part analyzes the application of legislative data in our legal interpretation. On the basis of existing academic research and absorbing foreign experience, the author puts forward the specific requirements for the application of legislative materials in the interpretation of laws in our country, which is a prerequisite for the rational and accurate use of legislative data in the administration of justice. At the same time, according to the specific content of different legislative materials in our country, the application method of relevant legislative data is put forward in combination with the case. The fifth part analyzes and responds to the doubts of the use of legislative data in the legal interpretation in academic circles. The legitimacy and rationality of the application of legislative materials in legal interpretation are clarified, and the legal status of using legislative materials in legal interpretation is demonstrated. The sixth part summarizes the important role of legislative materials in legal interpretation, and clarifies the position of legislative materials as the main basis of legal interpretation. In the judicial practice, we should follow the requirements and methods of using the legislative materials, explain the legal provisions, understand the legislative intention accurately in the case, and maintain the legal stability, fairness and justice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D901
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 焦寶乾;;文本論:一種法律文本解釋方法的學(xué)說考察——以美國法為中心[J];法律方法;2002年00期
2 焦寶乾;;論法律解釋的目標(biāo)[J];法律方法;2005年00期
3 魏瑋;外部輔助資料在法律解釋中的作用[J];法律適用(國家法官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2002年03期
4 蔣惠嶺;歷史解釋法歷史解釋法在司法裁判中的應(yīng)用[J];法律適用(國家法官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2002年11期
5 馬利和;;試述立法活動(dòng)中的法律草案說明[J];法學(xué)雜志;1991年02期
6 陳興良;非家庭成員間遺棄行為之定性研究——王益民等遺棄案之分析[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2005年04期
7 焦寶乾;;“法律方法”的用語及概念解析[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期
8 吳弘侃;;淺析《勞動(dòng)合同法》立法目的[J];現(xiàn)代商業(yè);2008年11期
9 焦寶乾;論西方客觀主義的法律解釋傳統(tǒng)[J];政法論叢;2004年05期
10 陳建文;歷次公布法律草案征求全民意見情況一覽表[J];中國人大;2005年S1期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條
1 江蘇省宿遷市人民檢察院 孫濤 江蘇省洪澤湖監(jiān)獄 朱永青 江蘇省泗洪縣人民檢察院 陳明;[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2009年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 紀(jì)誠;最高人民法院司法解釋研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2006年
2 王凱石;刑法適用解釋研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 張潔;議會(huì)議事錄在英國法律解釋中的命運(yùn)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年
2 張肖峰;法律草案公布的功能及制度建構(gòu)[D];上海交通大學(xué);2010年
，本文編號(hào)：2338517
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2338517.html
