美國專利法不正當(dāng)行為原則研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-09 20:42
【摘要】：不正當(dāng)行為原則，是美國專利法領(lǐng)域自判例發(fā)展而來的一項(xiàng)普通法規(guī)則，也是美國專利侵權(quán)訴訟中最為著名和普遍的抗辯規(guī)則。其中不正當(dāng)行為，是指專利申請人在專利申請過程中對美國專利商標(biāo)局作出的違反誠實(shí)義務(wù)的行為。在這一原則下，法院經(jīng)由被控侵權(quán)方舉證證明專利持有人在專利申請過程中存在不正當(dāng)行為，則判決駁回該專利整體的強(qiáng)制效力。自此不正當(dāng)行為原則確立的第一個判例落定至今，針對不正當(dāng)行為成立的檢測方法和舉證標(biāo)準(zhǔn)一直處于發(fā)展和演變過程中，并經(jīng)過大量的歷史判例積累，形成了較為復(fù)雜的適用規(guī)則。 本文在結(jié)構(gòu)上包括五個部分。 第一部分介紹該原則的基本概念和特征，其在專利法體系當(dāng)中的功能和目標(biāo)，以及該原則發(fā)展的歷史判例，以期從整體對該原則在美國專利制度中的地位和作用形成一個初始概念。 第二部分討論不正當(dāng)行為原則的理論基礎(chǔ)。不正當(dāng)行為原則的理論淵源來自兩個方面，其一，是美國專利法實(shí)施細(xì)則第一章第56條規(guī)定的專利申請程序中申請人的“真實(shí)陳述義務(wù)”，其二，，是一項(xiàng)普通法原則——“不潔之手”原則。前者解釋了不正當(dāng)行為原則的設(shè)立意義以及主要的目標(biāo)，后者則是在該原則的創(chuàng)設(shè)案例中作為其上位原則被援用，并因此成為法院創(chuàng)設(shè)并適用該原則的判例法上的依據(jù)。 第三部分分析和梳理不正當(dāng)行為的認(rèn)定和檢測標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的形成、發(fā)展和演變。首先是重要性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，本文梳理了重要性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)兩種不同的測試方法，以及對重要性認(rèn)定的三種相互區(qū)別的裁量尺度；其次是意圖因素，通過分析幾個重要判例中法官對意圖因素認(rèn)定的意見，梳理了意圖因素常見的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，以及法官認(rèn)定該意圖因素所普遍采用的分析方法。通過上述梳理和分析，本文向讀者展示法院具體如何運(yùn)用該原則鑒別和治愈不正當(dāng)行為。 第四部分闡釋不正當(dāng)行為原則適用的訴訟結(jié)果及其成文法律依據(jù)和判例法淵源，尤其是分析不正當(dāng)行為所導(dǎo)致的專利整體無執(zhí)行力的法律意義，并論述為何不正當(dāng)行為原則將導(dǎo)致專利整體無執(zhí)行力。此外，該部分還對不正當(dāng)行為可能引起的其他懲罰性后果進(jìn)行了介紹。 第五部分的主題是美國范圍內(nèi)圍繞不正當(dāng)行為原則的爭論和質(zhì)疑，以及其對我國的借鑒意義。該部分中首先梳理了美國法院、學(xué)者和專利持有人等專利界各方面對該原則的評價(jià)和爭議，明確該原則目前的爭議核心所在，其次，分別從作為一種司法公共政策和作為一種訴訟抗辯策略兩種功能角色入手，分析該原則在美國專利歷史發(fā)展和凈化專利申請程序和專利市場秩序方面的功能及其現(xiàn)狀，以及其對美國專利訴訟的影響和功能發(fā)揮。
[Abstract]:The principle of improper conduct is a common law rule developed from case law in the field of patent law in the United States. It is also the most famous and universal defense rule in patent infringement litigation in the United States. The improper act refers to the act of violating the honest obligation of the patent applicant to the US Patent and Trademark Office in the process of patent application. Under this principle, if the court proves that the patent holder is guilty of improper behavior in the process of patent application, the court will reject the compulsory effect of the patent as a whole. Since the establishment of the first case law on the principle of improper conduct, the detection methods and standard of proof for the establishment of improper acts have been in the process of development and evolution, and have been accumulated through a large number of historical precedents. The formation of more complex applicable rules. The structure of this paper consists of five parts. The first part introduces the basic concepts and characteristics of the principle, its functions and objectives in the patent law system, as well as the historical precedents of the development of the principle. In order to form an initial concept about the position and function of the principle in the patent system of the United States as a whole. The second part discusses the theoretical basis of the principle of improper conduct. The theoretical origin of the principle of improper conduct comes from two aspects. One is the "true statement obligation" of the applicant in the patent application procedure stipulated in Chapter I, Article 56, of the United States Patent Law Enforcement rules, and the other is the true statement obligation of the applicant. Is a common law principle-the "unclean hand" principle. The former explains the significance of the establishment of the principle of improper conduct and its main goal, while the latter is invoked as its superior principle in the case of the creation of the principle, and thus becomes the basis of case law for the court to create and apply the principle. The third part analyzes and combs the formation, development and evolution of the identification and detection standard of improper behavior. The first is the importance standard, this article combs two different test methods of importance standard, and three different kinds of discretion measure to the materiality, the second is the intention factor, By analyzing the opinions of judges on the determination of intention factors in several important cases, this paper combs the common criteria for the determination of intention factors and the analytical methods commonly used by judges to identify the intention factors. Through the above analysis, this paper shows the readers how to use the principle to identify and cure misconduct. The fourth part explains the legal results of the application of the principle of improper conduct and its written legal basis and the origin of case law, especially analyzes the legal significance of the patent as a whole with no execution power caused by improper conduct. And discusses why the principle of improper conduct will lead to the patent as a whole has no enforcement. In addition, this part also introduces other punitive consequences of improper conduct. The theme of the fifth part is the controversy and doubt about the principle of improper conduct in the United States, and its reference significance to our country. In this part, the author firstly combs the evaluation and dispute of the principle in the patent circles, such as American courts, scholars and patent holders, and clarifies the core of the dispute on the principle. Secondly, This paper analyzes the function and current situation of this principle in the development of patent history and the purification of patent application procedure and patent market order in the United States, starting with its two roles as a judicial public policy and a kind of litigation defense strategy. And its impact on the United States patent litigation and function play.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D971.2;DD913
本文編號：2260719
[Abstract]:The principle of improper conduct is a common law rule developed from case law in the field of patent law in the United States. It is also the most famous and universal defense rule in patent infringement litigation in the United States. The improper act refers to the act of violating the honest obligation of the patent applicant to the US Patent and Trademark Office in the process of patent application. Under this principle, if the court proves that the patent holder is guilty of improper behavior in the process of patent application, the court will reject the compulsory effect of the patent as a whole. Since the establishment of the first case law on the principle of improper conduct, the detection methods and standard of proof for the establishment of improper acts have been in the process of development and evolution, and have been accumulated through a large number of historical precedents. The formation of more complex applicable rules. The structure of this paper consists of five parts. The first part introduces the basic concepts and characteristics of the principle, its functions and objectives in the patent law system, as well as the historical precedents of the development of the principle. In order to form an initial concept about the position and function of the principle in the patent system of the United States as a whole. The second part discusses the theoretical basis of the principle of improper conduct. The theoretical origin of the principle of improper conduct comes from two aspects. One is the "true statement obligation" of the applicant in the patent application procedure stipulated in Chapter I, Article 56, of the United States Patent Law Enforcement rules, and the other is the true statement obligation of the applicant. Is a common law principle-the "unclean hand" principle. The former explains the significance of the establishment of the principle of improper conduct and its main goal, while the latter is invoked as its superior principle in the case of the creation of the principle, and thus becomes the basis of case law for the court to create and apply the principle. The third part analyzes and combs the formation, development and evolution of the identification and detection standard of improper behavior. The first is the importance standard, this article combs two different test methods of importance standard, and three different kinds of discretion measure to the materiality, the second is the intention factor, By analyzing the opinions of judges on the determination of intention factors in several important cases, this paper combs the common criteria for the determination of intention factors and the analytical methods commonly used by judges to identify the intention factors. Through the above analysis, this paper shows the readers how to use the principle to identify and cure misconduct. The fourth part explains the legal results of the application of the principle of improper conduct and its written legal basis and the origin of case law, especially analyzes the legal significance of the patent as a whole with no execution power caused by improper conduct. And discusses why the principle of improper conduct will lead to the patent as a whole has no enforcement. In addition, this part also introduces other punitive consequences of improper conduct. The theme of the fifth part is the controversy and doubt about the principle of improper conduct in the United States, and its reference significance to our country. In this part, the author firstly combs the evaluation and dispute of the principle in the patent circles, such as American courts, scholars and patent holders, and clarifies the core of the dispute on the principle. Secondly, This paper analyzes the function and current situation of this principle in the development of patent history and the purification of patent application procedure and patent market order in the United States, starting with its two roles as a judicial public policy and a kind of litigation defense strategy. And its impact on the United States patent litigation and function play.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D971.2;DD913
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條
1 劉強(qiáng);;從行政許可法看授予專利權(quán)制度的改進(jìn)[J];湖南文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2007年05期
2 海冰;;美國專利法中的不正當(dāng)行為問題[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年04期
3 劉文琦;;解讀美國專利法“不正當(dāng)行為”理論的適用[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年05期
4 閆爾寶;;行政法誠信原則的內(nèi)涵分析——以民法誠信原則為參照[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2007年01期
5 劉珍蘭;;美國專利法不正當(dāng)行為原則的最新發(fā)展[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2011年05期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 魏有花;專利侵權(quán)抗辯法律研究[D];華僑大學(xué);2006年
本文編號：2260719
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2260719.html
