【摘要】：早期的資料論述，把預算定義為“一種計劃”，絕少提及其具有法律性。而后期的論述中，有的學者認為預算具有的最本質特性是法律性。美國早期的憲法中并沒有關于預算制度的規(guī)定，，直到1800年才規(guī)定財政部應向國會對聯(lián)邦財政收支做出相應報告。在1921年美國通過了《預算審計法案》，正式規(guī)定總統(tǒng)每年要向國會提出預算報告。之后又制定了一系列預算監(jiān)督相關內容的法律。通過這些法律，美國建立了一套體系比較完整、職責比較明確、依據(jù)比較充分的預算監(jiān)督法律制度。一個國家的預算法，其實質是給政府各部門所制定的約束和監(jiān)督其行為的規(guī)則。美國的預算制度創(chuàng)新具有很強的借鑒意義，是現(xiàn)代各國預算制度變遷的典型。 雖然我國國情與美國不盡相同，其預算監(jiān)督立法經(jīng)驗也不能完全照搬，但國家的預算監(jiān)督法律制度存在共同特點和其特色之處。在任何一國的法律中，憲法對預算監(jiān)督進行了詳細的規(guī)定，為規(guī)范和約束預算監(jiān)督活動提供了具有最高法律效力的依據(jù)。在憲法的基礎之上，發(fā)達國家還制定了專門法來對預算監(jiān)督進一步細化。例如：美國制訂了一系列的有關預算監(jiān)督的法律，《預算與會計法案》、《國會預算和扣押法案》、《平衡預算和經(jīng)濟赤字控制法》、《預算執(zhí)行法案》、《綜合預算調整法案》等，這些法律影響著聯(lián)邦預算的規(guī)模，指導著預算程序參與者們的行為，對我國預算監(jiān)督制度改革和完善也具有一定的指導意義。盡管《中華人民共和國預算法修正案（草案）》旨在政府預算公開、透明、科學、完整、健全和監(jiān)督方面都有做出一些改進，但離現(xiàn)代意義上的憲政民主政治的立法精神仍有距離。借此論文作者以美國聯(lián)邦預算的法律基礎——美國聯(lián)邦預算法律體系為借鑒，運用歷史考察法及比較分析法，界定了美國聯(lián)邦預算法的范圍，回顧了美國聯(lián)邦預算法發(fā)展的歷史經(jīng)歷，并總結了其發(fā)展過程中的一些基本規(guī)律和特征。希望能對中國的預算法改革有一定的借鑒作用。
[Abstract]:In early references, budgeting was defined as "a plan", with little mention of its legal nature. However, in the later discussion, some scholars think that the most essential characteristic of budget is law. Early U.S. constitutions did not provide for a budget system. It was not until 1800 that the Treasury was required to report federal revenues and expenditures to Congress. In 1921, the United States passed the Budget Audit Act, formally requiring the President to submit annual budget reports to Congress. After that, a series of laws related to budget supervision were formulated. Through these laws, the United States has established a more complete system, clear responsibilities, and a more adequate legal system of budget supervision. The essence of a country's budget law is the regulation that governs and supervises the government's actions. The innovation of American budget system is of great significance and is a typical example of the changes of budget system in modern countries. Although the national conditions of our country are different from those of the United States, and its experience of budget supervision legislation can not be completely copied, the legal system of budget supervision in our country has common characteristics and features. In the laws of any country, the constitution has made detailed provisions on budget supervision, which provides the highest legal basis for the regulation and restraint of budget supervision activities. On the basis of constitutions, developed countries have enacted special laws to further refine budget supervision. For example, the United States has enacted a series of laws on budget supervision, the Budget and Accounting Act, the Congressional Budget and seizure Act, the balanced Budget and Economic deficit Control Act, the Budget Enforcement Act, the Comprehensive Budget Adjustment Act, and so on. These laws affect the scale of the federal budget, guide the behavior of participants in the budget process, and also have certain guiding significance for the reform and improvement of the budget supervision system in our country. Although the Budget Law Amendment (draft) of the people's Republic of China aims to make some improvements in the government budget in terms of openness, transparency, science, integrity, soundness and supervision, However, there is still a distance from the legislative spirit of constitutional democracy in the modern sense. In this paper, the author draws lessons from the United States federal budget legal system, which is the legal basis of the United States federal budget, and uses the historical investigation method and comparative analysis method to define the scope of the United States Federal Budget Law. This paper reviews the historical experience of the development of the Federal Budget Law of the United States, and summarizes some basic laws and characteristics in the course of its development. I hope it can be used for reference to the reform of China's budget law.
【學位授予單位】：吉林財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D971.2;DD912.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前9條

1 周軍華;楊紅偉;;論美國國會預算權的運作過程及功能[J];安徽大學學報;2006年02期

2 肖鵬;;美國聯(lián)邦預算管理法律體系演變與啟示[J];財貿(mào)研究;2009年06期

3 王雍君;;《預算法》修訂中的四個關鍵性問題探討[J];地方財政研究;2011年01期

4 方福前;論凱恩斯理論與羅斯�！靶抡钡年P系[J];經(jīng)濟理論與經(jīng)濟管理;1998年03期

5 曲巖;美國聯(lián)邦政府預算編制及啟示[J];經(jīng)濟論壇;2005年07期

6 詹姆斯·L.陳;白彥鋒;;論美國重大的聯(lián)邦預算法[J];經(jīng)濟社會體制比較;2008年01期

7 李永柱;美國的財政法律體系探視[J];遼寧財稅;2002年03期

8 鄧廷濤;;投票與民主[J];人大研究;2008年10期

9 田素華;;美國經(jīng)濟調整趨向與中國的政策選擇[J];世界經(jīng)濟與政治論壇;2006年05期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 王逸帥;美國預算民主的制度變遷研究[D];上海交通大學;2009年

相關碩士學位論文 前5條

1 陳晨;公共財政建設下提升財政透明度的研究[D];天津財經(jīng)大學;2010年

2 張蕊;論我國公共財政預算的法制監(jiān)督[D];河北大學;2011年

3 龔少華;中美政府預算的比較研究[D];西南財經(jīng)大學;2006年

4 朱輝;論杰克遜時代的美國民主[D];浙江大學;2008年

5 劉曉明;中國由稅收國家向預算國家轉型對策研究[D];山西財經(jīng)大學;2008年

本文編號：2233494