天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當(dāng)前位置:主頁 > 法律論文 > 法理論文 >

論我國(guó)古代“親親相隱”制度及其當(dāng)代價(jià)值

發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-08-31 17:24
【摘要】:中國(guó)古代“親親相隱”制度是封建社會(huì)維系政權(quán)的一項(xiàng)重要法制度和倫理原則。它不僅存在于我國(guó)古代社會(huì),而且在外國(guó)歷史和現(xiàn)代法律制度中也有所體現(xiàn)。然而,遺憾的是,新中國(guó)成立后,親屬容隱制度被視為封建糟粕而被廢除。在一元化的意識(shí)形態(tài)中,一味強(qiáng)調(diào)大義滅親、大公無私,親屬之間的各種自然親情被忽視或扭曲。這種忽視親情的價(jià)值觀必然與我國(guó)當(dāng)前社會(huì)所倡導(dǎo)的和諧價(jià)值觀存在很大分歧。 在現(xiàn)代社會(huì)中,“親親相隱”制度仍然有其存在的合理理由和適用空間,它對(duì)社會(huì)主義法制文明、社會(huì)文明以及當(dāng)前國(guó)家大力倡導(dǎo)的和諧社會(huì)建設(shè)起到不可忽視的作用。我們應(yīng)該立足現(xiàn)代法律的多元價(jià)值視角,重新考量該制度,借鑒古今中外有益之處,更好地為我國(guó)法制現(xiàn)代化建設(shè)服務(wù)。 本文對(duì)“親親相隱”制度的闡述,分為四個(gè)部分展開: 第一部分,概述了古代“親親相隱”制度的基本理論。闡述了“親親相隱”制度的含義、產(chǎn)生、發(fā)展,使我們對(duì)親屬相隱制度有宏觀、全面的了解;同時(shí)將該制度與西方親屬相隱制度進(jìn)行比較,對(duì)比中西容隱制度發(fā)展的異同,分析親屬相隱制度在現(xiàn)代社會(huì)的可行性和實(shí)施該制度的意義。 第二部分,尋找“親親相隱”制度在自然法、刑法、訴訟法上的理論支持,具體論述現(xiàn)代法學(xué)理論中“親親相隱”制度存在的合理性。 第③部分,分析“親親相隱”的當(dāng)代價(jià)值,結(jié)合我國(guó)構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì)的理念,從“親親相隱”對(duì)社會(huì)和諧、司法和諧所具有的重要價(jià)值作出評(píng)價(jià)。其中對(duì)社會(huì)和諧的價(jià)值探討,主要從政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化三方面進(jìn)行,政治上體現(xiàn)人權(quán)價(jià)值、社會(huì)穩(wěn)定價(jià)值、防止?jié)撛谏鐣?huì)矛盾風(fēng)險(xiǎn)價(jià)值;經(jīng)濟(jì)上可以權(quán)衡社會(huì)宏觀層面的經(jīng)濟(jì)性與司法成本的關(guān)系;文化上主要體現(xiàn)對(duì)傳統(tǒng)文化的承繼價(jià)值,不僅有利于傳統(tǒng)家庭文化,還有益于傳統(tǒng)社會(huì)關(guān)系穩(wěn)定。在論述“親親相隱”對(duì)于司法和諧的價(jià)值問題上,則從公安機(jī)關(guān)、檢察機(jī)關(guān)、法院三個(gè)司法主體在實(shí)踐中的問題展開和諧價(jià)值分析,如,在公安機(jī)關(guān)的司法實(shí)踐中,“親親相隱”有預(yù)防誘供、逼供、引發(fā)社會(huì)新矛盾的作用;在檢察機(jī)關(guān)中,“親親相隱”符合“寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)”、“少捕慎捕”的檢察政策;在法院司法審判中,“親親相隱”有利于刑事司法和解以及民事賠償?shù)膶?shí)現(xiàn)。 第四部分,探究“親親相隱”制度對(duì)于現(xiàn)代社會(huì)的借鑒作用,提出在依法治國(guó)環(huán)境下實(shí)施“親親相隱”制度的具體方案和設(shè)想。
[Abstract]:In ancient China, the system of closeness between relatives and relatives was an important legal system and ethical principle for the feudal society to maintain political power. It exists not only in ancient society, but also in foreign history and modern legal system. Unfortunately, however, after the founding of New China, the system of relative concealment was abolished as a feudal dregs. In the monistic ideology, the emphasis is always on the elimination of relatives, unselfishness, and the neglect or distortion of the natural kinship between relatives. This kind of value of neglecting family affection must have great differences with the harmonious values advocated by our society. In modern society, there are still reasonable reasons and space for the existence of the system, which plays an important role in the construction of socialist legal civilization, social civilization and the harmonious society advocated by the state. We should base ourselves on the pluralistic value perspective of modern law, reconsider the system, draw lessons from the advantages of ancient, modern and foreign countries, and better serve for the modernization of our country's legal system. This paper expounds the system of "close relatives and close relatives hidden", which is divided into four parts: the first part summarizes the basic theory of the ancient system of "close relatives and close relatives hidden to each other". This paper expounds the meaning, emergence and development of the system of "closeness between relatives and relatives", which makes us have a macroscopic and comprehensive understanding of the system of relative concealment, and at the same time, compares the system with that of western relatives, and compares the similarities and differences between the development of the system of concealment and concealment between China and the West. This paper analyzes the feasibility of the relative concealment system in modern society and the significance of its implementation. In the second part, the author tries to find the theoretical support of the system in natural law, criminal law and procedural law, and discusses in detail the rationality of the existence of the system of "closeness between relatives and relatives" in modern legal theory. In the third part, the author analyzes the contemporary value of "closeness between relatives and relatives", combines the concept of constructing harmonious society in our country, and evaluates the important value of "concealment of relatives and relatives" to social harmony and judicial harmony. The value of social harmony is mainly discussed from three aspects of politics, economy and culture, which embody the value of human rights, social stability and prevent potential social contradictions. Economically, we can weigh the relationship between economy and judicial cost at the macro level of society, and the inheritance value of traditional culture is mainly reflected in culture, which is not only beneficial to traditional family culture, but also beneficial to the stability of traditional social relations. In discussing the value of "close relatives hiding" to judicial harmony, this paper analyzes the harmonious value of the three judicial subjects in practice, such as public security organs, procuratorial organs and courts, for example, in the judicial practice of public security organs. "intimate relatives" can prevent confessions, extract confessions, and lead to new social contradictions. In procuratorial organs, "close relatives and close relatives" are in line with the procuratorial policy of "lenient and strict punishment" and "less arrest and careful arrest"; and in the judicial trial of the courts, The concealment of relatives is conducive to the reconciliation of criminal justice and the realization of civil compensation. In the fourth part, the author probes into the reference function of the system of "closeness of relatives and relatives" to modern society, and puts forward the concrete plan and assumption of implementing the system of "closeness of relatives and relatives" under the circumstance of governing the country according to law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號(hào)】:D929;D925.2;D924

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 范忠信;親親相為隱:中外法律的共同傳統(tǒng)——兼論其根源及其與法治的關(guān)系[J];比較法研究;1997年02期

2 江學(xué);親親相隱及其現(xiàn)代化[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2002年05期

3 張煒東;;公安機(jī)關(guān)健全完善化解民眾不滿情緒及社會(huì)矛盾長(zhǎng)效機(jī)制之探討[J];公安研究;2010年12期

4 陳士果;;論親親相隱與刑事法治[J];管子學(xué)刊;2007年01期

5 王瑞娟;;論傳統(tǒng)容隱制度的現(xiàn)代重構(gòu)——從法學(xué)、倫理學(xué)的視角[J];懷化學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年07期

6 范忠信;中西法律傳統(tǒng)中的“親親相隱”[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);1997年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 胡謙;中國(guó)古代親屬容隱制度述論[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2001年

2 鄭小苗;親親相隱與期待可能性問題研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2006年

,

本文編號(hào):2215662

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2215662.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶e7ea7***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要?jiǎng)h除請(qǐng)E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com