【摘要】：任何一個(gè)偉大的理論，必將產(chǎn)生于對(duì)前一個(gè)偉大理論的繼承與批判中。正如孔德在對(duì)形而上學(xué)的批判中提出了實(shí)證主義，邊沁在對(duì)布萊克斯通的批判中提出了功利主義，奧斯丁在批判霍布斯和邊沁的過(guò)程中完善了自己的法律思想，并進(jìn)而形成了分析實(shí)證主義法學(xué)。 本文以學(xué)術(shù)思想的邏輯關(guān)系為主線，以?shī)W斯丁法律思想作為參照，通過(guò)梳理對(duì)其法律思想產(chǎn)生影響的幾位重要代表人物的學(xué)說(shuō)，來(lái)梳理該學(xué)派的形成過(guò)程。 第一部分，緒論提出問(wèn)題，介紹選題的意義。就“分析實(shí)證主義法學(xué)”的含義，“分析實(shí)證主義法學(xué)形成”的含義，以及“奧斯丁法律思想”與“分析實(shí)證主義法學(xué)”之間的關(guān)系做簡(jiǎn)要概述。以明確本文的研究目的和語(yǔ)境。 第二部分，論述奧斯丁法律思想的特點(diǎn)，提出其中研究方法和研究對(duì)象是分析實(shí)證主義法學(xué)形成的主要標(biāo)志。 第三部分，以?shī)W斯丁法律思想的來(lái)源作為邏輯主線，分別論述與其思想形成有關(guān)的幾位重要法學(xué)家及其學(xué)說(shuō)，以及奧斯丁運(yùn)用分析實(shí)證的方法對(duì)這些學(xué)說(shuō)的批判。這部分將采用法律思想的批判繼承關(guān)系作為章節(jié)前后安排的順序，并以此來(lái)描繪分析實(shí)證主義法學(xué)形成的進(jìn)路。論證第二部分的觀點(diǎn)。 第四部分，根據(jù)前面對(duì)奧斯丁法律思想來(lái)源的探討，總結(jié)奧斯丁對(duì)分析實(shí)證主義法學(xué)的貢獻(xiàn)，即他在批判前人的過(guò)程中所采用的分析實(shí)證方法及研究思路。 第五部分，作為結(jié)尾，該部分將以分析實(shí)證主義法學(xué)后續(xù)發(fā)展的一部分情況，對(duì)奧斯丁的古典分析實(shí)證主義做一些回應(yīng)。重點(diǎn)探討奧斯丁開(kāi)創(chuàng)的分析實(shí)證的研究方法在后繼者中的運(yùn)用。 至此，奧斯丁與分析實(shí)證主義法學(xué)形成關(guān)系的概況將展現(xiàn)在我們面前。
[Abstract]:Any great theory will come from the inheritance and criticism of the former great theory. Just as Conde put forward positivism in his critique of metaphysics, Bentham put forward utilitarianism in his critique of Blackstone, Austin perfected his own legal thought in the process of criticizing Hobbes and Bentham. And then formed an analytical positivism law. Taking the logical relationship of academic thought as the main line and Austin's legal thought as the reference, this paper combs the formation process of this school by combing the theories of several important representatives who have an influence on his legal thought. The first part, introduction raises questions, introduces the significance of the topic. The meaning of "Analytical positivism Law", the meaning of "Analytical positivism Law formation" and the relationship between "Austin's legal thought" and "Analytical positivism Law" are briefly summarized. In order to clarify the purpose and context of this study. The second part discusses the characteristics of Austin's legal thought, and points out that the research method and research object are the main marks of the formation of positivism law. In the third part, taking the source of Austin's legal thought as the logical thread, the author discusses several important jurists and their theories related to the formation of his thoughts, and his criticism of these theories by using the method of empirical analysis. This part will adopt the critical inheritance relation of the legal thought as the order of arrangement before and after the chapter, and describe and analyze the path of positivism law formation. The second part of the argument point of view. The fourth part, according to the previous discussion on Austin's legal thought source, summarizes Austen's contribution to the analysis of positivism law, that is, the analytical and empirical methods and research ideas he used in the process of criticizing his predecessors. The fifth part, as the end, will make some responses to Austen's classical analytical positivism by analyzing part of the development of positivism law. This paper focuses on the application of empirical research methods initiated by Austen to successors. At this point, the relationship between Austen and analytical positivism law will be revealed in front of us.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D90

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 劉之楊;;法學(xué)流派成長(zhǎng)要素的具象觀察——以18—20世紀(jì)的分析法學(xué)派為例[J];中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)研究生學(xué)報(bào);2016年06期

2 劉之楊;;略論法學(xué)流派形成的核心要素——以從邊沁到哈特的分析法學(xué)派為例[J];財(cái)經(jīng)政法資訊;2016年04期

3 王亞靜;;論分析實(shí)證主義法學(xué)對(duì)我國(guó)法制建設(shè)的啟示[J];法制與社會(huì);2015年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2209663