本文選題：唐代 + 雜治��； 參考：《法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào))》2017年02期

【摘要】：唐代永徽以后,雜治并未被三司推事所徹底取代,反而對(duì)“三司”制度形成相當(dāng)沖擊與影響,所謂“三司推事”常有名實(shí)不符之困境。究其根本,乃是雜治慣例持續(xù)起效之表征�！笆苁氯尽钡闹鸩降雠c“推事三司”之尷尬境遇,均源自傳統(tǒng)雜治慣例的強(qiáng)勢(shì)干預(yù)。從雜治到三司,乃至三司使的出現(xiàn),群臣雜治慣例始終是唐代詔獄會(huì)審之主流模式,御史臺(tái)在雜治規(guī)則運(yùn)行中占據(jù)優(yōu)越地位。至中晚唐時(shí)期,雜治地位呈現(xiàn)下移趨勢(shì)。
[Abstract]:After the Tang Dynasty Yonghui, miscellaneous governance was not completely replaced by the "three divisions" judge, on the contrary, the "three divisions" system formed a considerable impact and influence, the so-called "three divisions" often do not agree with the plight of the name. The root of it is the symbol of the continuous effect of the rule of miscellaneous governance. The gradual fading out of the "three divisions" and the embarrassing situation of the "three divisions of judges" all stem from the strong intervention of the traditional miscellaneous rule. From miscellaneous governance to three departments, and even the emergence of the three departments, the rule of miscellaneous governance of officials has always been the mainstream mode of the imperial court in the Tang Dynasty, and the imperial court occupies a superior position in the operation of miscellaneous governance rules. To the middle and late Tang Dynasty, the status of miscellaneous governance showed a downward trend.
【作者單位】： 西北政法大學(xué)刑事法學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：DF092

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前6條

1 方寶璋;三司審計(jì)話五代[N];中國(guó)審計(jì)報(bào);2002年

2 方寶璋;遼、金審計(jì)仿唐宋[N];中國(guó)審計(jì)報(bào);2003年

3 方寶璋;宋代審計(jì)的特點(diǎn)與得失[N];中國(guó)審計(jì)報(bào);2003年

4 朱兆龍;君子正其衣冠[N];北京日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

5 虞云國(guó);設(shè)置變法“總樞紐”的利弊[N];東方早報(bào);2014年

6 ;包公為何傳千古[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2002年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 黃亞娟;北宋三司使研究[D];河南大學(xué);2006年

2 王盈;論宋代茶法的制定[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2113074