發(fā)布時間：2018-07-04 11:30

  本文選題：新農(nóng)村建設 + 法文化��； 參考：《安徽大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：當前,我國已進入全面建設小康社會的關鍵時期,新農(nóng)村的建設是我們黨提出的戰(zhàn)略性的歷史任務,是構建和諧社會的重要一環(huán)。法文化是一種綜合性的文化載體,集中反映了意識、制度以及法律機構設施等各種法律的構成情況。文化是人類在社會歷史發(fā)展進程中所創(chuàng)造的復合財富,其自身具備軟實力要素：文化的承載力、發(fā)展力與張力。作為文化的下位概念,法文化也具備著軟實力要素。農(nóng)村法文化的承載力是農(nóng)村現(xiàn)有法文化對農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟、社會發(fā)展的支撐力;農(nóng)村法文化的發(fā)展力是農(nóng)村法文化自身發(fā)展的內(nèi)在趨勢和傾向性；農(nóng)村法文化的張力對農(nóng)村,乃至整個社會產(chǎn)生的強大的拉動作用。而當前我國農(nóng)村地區(qū)的法文化的現(xiàn)狀令人堪憂。農(nóng)村地區(qū)的法文化整體上在中國傳統(tǒng)法文化與外來法文化、農(nóng)村地區(qū)的民間習慣與國家法等出現(xiàn)斷裂,導致了當代農(nóng)村的法文化已不能適應農(nóng)村地區(qū)的科學發(fā)展。正是由于法文化的軟實力以及當前法文化的斷裂,在建設“生產(chǎn)發(fā)展、生活寬裕、鄉(xiāng)風文明、村容整潔、管理民主”的新農(nóng)村時,就必須要正式法文化的重構對于新農(nóng)村建設的重要作用。全文共分為四個部分： 第一部分分析了在當前建設社會主義新農(nóng)時法文化的重要作用。通過分析法文化對農(nóng)村市場經(jīng)濟、農(nóng)村精神文明建設、農(nóng)村民主政治以及社會公平正義方面的促進與保障作用,指出法文化對新農(nóng)村建設的意義。法文化作為一種軟實力,可以為農(nóng)村的經(jīng)濟、社會等各個方面提供文化與制度層面上的保障與推動作用。 第二部分著重指出當代農(nóng)村法文化的現(xiàn)狀。當前農(nóng)村的法文化表現(xiàn)出諸多特性,從實質(zhì)上講,其是一種多元混合、多類并存的法文化。農(nóng)村法文化是農(nóng)村文化與國家文明互動統(tǒng)一的過程,是農(nóng)村的封閉性與國家法的整體性的統(tǒng)一,也是農(nóng)村傳統(tǒng)與現(xiàn)代文明的統(tǒng)一。造成農(nóng)村法文化不平衡的尷尬局面的原因是多方面的。小農(nóng)經(jīng)濟的分散封閉性與市場經(jīng)濟的本質(zhì)相背離,民間傳統(tǒng)與國家法出現(xiàn)了斷裂,西方法文化與中國傳統(tǒng)法文化的斷裂等方面是造成當代農(nóng)村法文化斷裂的根本原因。 第三部分是文章的落腳點。在分析法文化對新農(nóng)村建設的戰(zhàn)略意義以及當代農(nóng)村法文化與新農(nóng)村建設的總體要求不相適應的前提下,提出農(nóng)村法文化的重構。一方面,農(nóng)村法文化重構的模式包括路徑選擇與主體支撐；另一方面,農(nóng)村法文化重構包括現(xiàn)代法律意識的培育以及農(nóng)村法律制度的完善�，F(xiàn)代法律意識應該要體現(xiàn)“法律至上”的原則與“公平正義”的價值理念。要注重積極吸收外來法文化精髓,還要充分挖掘傳統(tǒng)法文化的合理因素。文章從上訴角度探討我國新農(nóng)村建設中的農(nóng)村法文化的重構問題,試圖找到法文化與新農(nóng)村建設的平衡點。
[Abstract]:At present, our country has entered the key period of building a well-off society in an all-round way. The construction of a new countryside is a strategic historical task put forward by our Party and an important part of building a harmonious society. Legal culture is a comprehensive cultural carrier, which reflects the constitution of various laws such as consciousness, system and legal institution. Culture is a complex wealth created by human beings in the course of social and historical development. It has its own elements of soft power: bearing capacity, developing force and tension of culture. As the inferior concept of culture, legal culture also has the element of soft power. The carrying capacity of the rural legal culture is the support of the rural legal culture to the rural economy and social development, the development of the rural legal culture is the inherent trend and tendency of the rural legal culture's own development, the tension of the rural legal culture has great influence on the rural areas. Even the whole society produces the powerful pull function. The current situation of legal culture in rural areas of China is worrying. As a whole, the law culture in rural areas is broken between Chinese traditional law culture and foreign law culture, and the folk custom and national law in rural areas, which leads to the fact that the law culture in rural areas has been unable to adapt to the scientific development of rural areas. It is precisely because of the soft power of the legal culture and the rupture of the current legal culture that a new countryside with "productive development, rich living, civilized style of the countryside, clean and tidy villages and democratic management" is being built. The reconstruction of formal legal culture must play an important role in the construction of new countryside. The paper is divided into four parts: the first part analyzes the important role of the new socialist agriculture culture. This paper points out the significance of law culture to the construction of new countryside through the promotion and protection of the culture of analysis to the rural market economy, the construction of rural spiritual civilization, the rural democratic politics and the social fairness and justice. As a kind of soft power, legal culture can provide cultural and institutional protection and promotion for all aspects of rural economy and society. The second part emphatically points out the present situation of the contemporary rural legal culture. At present, the legal culture in rural areas shows many characteristics. In essence, it is a kind of multi-mixed, multi-category co-existing legal culture. The rural legal culture is the process of the interaction and unification of the rural culture and the national civilization, the unity of the country's closeness and the national law, as well as the unity of the rural tradition and the modern civilization. There are many reasons for the imbalance of legal culture in rural areas. The dispersion and closeness of small peasant economy deviates from the essence of market economy, the folk tradition and the state law break up, the west method culture and the Chinese traditional law culture break down, and so on are the fundamental causes of the contemporary rural legal culture fracture. The third part is the foothold of the article. On the premise of the strategic significance of analytic culture to the construction of new countryside and the general requirements of contemporary rural legal culture and new rural construction, the reconstruction of rural legal culture is put forward. On the one hand, the mode of reconstruction of rural legal culture includes path choice and main body support; on the other hand, the reconstruction of rural legal culture includes the cultivation of modern legal consciousness and the perfection of rural legal system. Modern legal consciousness should embody the principle of "law first" and the value idea of "fairness and justice". Attention should be paid to the positive absorption of the essence of foreign legal culture and to fully excavate the reasonable factors of traditional legal culture. This paper discusses the reconstruction of rural legal culture in the construction of new countryside from the angle of appeal, and tries to find the balance point between law culture and new rural construction.
【學位授予單位】：安徽大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D909.2;D422.6

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王衛(wèi)國;中國傳統(tǒng)法文化的結構-功能特性[J];比較法研究;1993年02期

2 李長健,伍文輝;信用社會的法文化探析[J];湖北社會科學;2005年06期

3 翟羽艷;中國民法現(xiàn)代化的目標與實現(xiàn)途徑[J];學術交流;2000年04期

4 赫然;;法文化一般理論探析[J];長白學刊;2007年06期

5 楊解君,莊漢;WTO與中國行政法文化的建構[J];當代法學;2004年05期

6 陳靜熔;中——中國古代法文化之價值目標[J];西南政法大學學報;2004年03期

7 毛為民;建立現(xiàn)代企業(yè)制度亟需發(fā)展企業(yè)法文化[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學院學報;1995年01期

8 高其才;論中國少數(shù)民族習慣法文化[J];中國法學;1996年01期

9 張玲娜;依法治國的法文化思考[J];理論月刊;2001年10期

10 馬克林,岳天明;甘、青特有民族法文化特色及法制建設的思考[J];甘肅社會科學;2004年04期

相關會議論文 前10條

1 陳其國;;關于社會主義新農(nóng)村建設的幾點思考[A];首屆湖湘三農(nóng)論壇論文集（中）[C];2008年

2 薛p，

本文編號：2095928