發(fā)布時間：2018-06-24 00:25

  本文選題：無意思聯(lián)絡(luò)數(shù)人侵權(quán) + 共同侵權(quán)��； 參考：《蘭州大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：2009年12月26日頒布的《侵權(quán)責任法》將最高人民法院《關(guān)于審理人身損害賠償案件適用法律若干問題的解釋》所規(guī)定的“直接結(jié)合”和“間接結(jié)合”的判斷標準加以改變,以有無主觀意思聯(lián)絡(luò)為要件,將無意思聯(lián)絡(luò)的數(shù)人侵權(quán)行為與共同侵權(quán)行為從本質(zhì)上區(qū)別開來,并以形成累積因果關(guān)系或部分因果關(guān)系作為無意思聯(lián)絡(luò)的數(shù)人侵權(quán)承擔連帶責任或按份責任的標準。該規(guī)定引起了理論界和實務(wù)界的激烈爭論,并由此引發(fā)了學者們對無意思聯(lián)絡(luò)的數(shù)人侵權(quán)的重新思考：一是無意思聯(lián)絡(luò)的數(shù)人侵權(quán)與共同侵權(quán)行為聯(lián)系與區(qū)別；二是無意思聯(lián)絡(luò)的數(shù)人侵權(quán)的構(gòu)成要件；三是無意思聯(lián)絡(luò)的數(shù)人侵權(quán)的本質(zhì)特征；四是無意思聯(lián)絡(luò)的數(shù)人侵權(quán)的責任承擔。 本論文共三章,以案例進行分析說明,首先分析案件雙方當事人的不同意見,對案件事實加以認定,其次結(jié)合實際案例從與共同侵權(quán)行為的對比中分析無意思聯(lián)絡(luò)的數(shù)人侵權(quán)的概念、構(gòu)成要件、本質(zhì)特征及類型,并劃分本案中各方當事人賠償責任,提出筆者自己對本案的判決意見；最后根據(jù)我國法律規(guī)定來進一步探討無意思聯(lián)絡(luò)的數(shù)人侵權(quán)行為中的責任承擔,并闡述一些由本案引發(fā)的思考。 本論文的主要觀點：無意思聯(lián)絡(luò)的數(shù)人侵權(quán)并非共同侵權(quán)行為。數(shù)侵權(quán)人分別實施侵權(quán)行為造成同一損害,行為與結(jié)果構(gòu)成累積因果關(guān)系,則各侵權(quán)人負連帶責任,否則,即負按份責任。或原因力不可分,各侵權(quán)人負連帶責任,原因力可分,則負按份責任。
[Abstract]:The Tort liability Law, promulgated on December 26, 2009, changed the judgment criteria of "direct combination" and "indirect combination" stipulated by the Supreme people's Court in the interpretation of certain issues concerning the applicable Law in cases of personal injury compensation. Taking whether there is a subjective connection or not, the author distinguishes the tort act of several people with no meaning contact from the joint tort act in essence. And taking the formation of cumulative causality or partial causality as the standard of joint and several liability or partial liability. This stipulation has caused the intense debate in the theory and the practice domain, and has caused the scholars to rethink to the multi-person torts which have no meaning contact: first, the connection and the difference between the multi-person torts and the joint torts that do not have the meaning connection; The second is the constitutive elements of the multi-person tort without meaning contact; the third is the essential characteristics of the multi-person tort without the intention contact; the fourth is the liability of the multi-person tort without the intention contact. There are three chapters in this paper, the case analysis, first of all, the analysis of the different views of the parties to the case, to determine the facts of the case, Secondly, it analyzes the concept, elements, essential characteristics and types of the multi-person tort without interest from the comparison between the joint tort and the actual case, and divides the liability of the parties concerned in the case. The author puts forward his own judgment opinion on this case; finally, according to the law of our country, the author further discusses the liability in the torts of several people who have no intention to contact, and expounds some thoughts caused by this case. The main point of this paper is that the tort of several people is not joint tort. If the tortfeasor respectively causes the same damage and the action and the result form a cumulative causality, each infringer shall be jointly and severally liable, otherwise, the infringer will be liable by the share. Or the cause force can not be divided, the infringer shall bear joint liability, the cause force may be divided, then shall bear the share responsibility.
【學位授予單位】：蘭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D920.5;D923

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 劉瑩;余正茂;;觸電人身損害賠償責任的認定和防范[J];祖國;2013年14期

，

本文編號：2059127