本文選題：專利 + 創(chuàng)造性　； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：授予發(fā)明專利必須滿足的三個(gè)實(shí)質(zhì)性條件為:新穎性、創(chuàng)造性、實(shí)用性。其中,發(fā)明專利的創(chuàng)造性是指同申請日以前已有的技術(shù)相比,該發(fā)明有突出的實(shí)質(zhì)性特點(diǎn)和顯著的進(jìn)步。但是專利創(chuàng)造性的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)比較難把握,主觀性很強(qiáng)。對此,創(chuàng)造性判斷的發(fā)展經(jīng)歷了從主觀到客觀的過程,隨后創(chuàng)造性判斷又出現(xiàn)了過度客觀化的問題。針對該問題,美國KSR案對專利創(chuàng)造性的判斷做出了調(diào)整。 目前我國科技發(fā)展迅速,專利申請數(shù)量激劇增長,如何把握專利創(chuàng)造性的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)尤其重要,因此有必要借鑒美國的做法,對我國專利創(chuàng)造性問題進(jìn)行研究。本文分為三個(gè)章節(jié)。第一章介紹了專利現(xiàn)狀及出現(xiàn)的問題。第一節(jié)介紹專利創(chuàng)造性的概念。第二節(jié)介紹了我國專利創(chuàng)造性判斷的發(fā)展。第三節(jié)提出了專利創(chuàng)造性發(fā)展中出現(xiàn)的過度客觀化問題,論述了該問題造成的影響以及對我國專利創(chuàng)造性的考驗(yàn)。 第二章分析了美國專利的創(chuàng)造性。第一節(jié)介紹了美國KSR案之前專利創(chuàng)造性的判斷內(nèi)容。第二節(jié)闡述了美國KSR案對專利創(chuàng)造性判斷做出的調(diào)整。第三節(jié)結(jié)合美國KSR案前后專利創(chuàng)造性性審查的兩個(gè)案例,深入分析美國專利創(chuàng)造性的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。 第三章通過比較中美兩國專利創(chuàng)造性判斷的異同,得出我國專利創(chuàng)造性存在的問題,提出專利創(chuàng)造性判斷的改進(jìn)意見。意見包括修正本領(lǐng)域技術(shù)人員的定義,完善顯而易見性的檢驗(yàn)方法。期望這些建議能夠滿足專利創(chuàng)造性判斷與我國技術(shù)發(fā)展相適應(yīng)要求,鼓勵(lì)創(chuàng)新,促進(jìn)我國社會(huì)的持續(xù)健康發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The three essential conditions for granting patent for invention are novelty, creativity and practicality. The creativity of the invention patent means that the invention has outstanding substantive characteristics and remarkable progress compared with the technology that existed before the application date. But the judgement standard of patent creativity is difficult to grasp, subjectivity is very strong. Therefore, the development of creative judgment has gone through the process from subjective to objective, and then the problem of excessive objectivity of creative judgment has appeared. In view of this problem, the US KSR case adjusts the judgment of patent creativity. At present, with the rapid development of science and technology in China, the number of patent applications has increased dramatically. It is particularly important to grasp the standards of patent creativity. Therefore, it is necessary to study the problem of patent creativity in China by drawing lessons from the practices of the United States. This paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter introduces the current situation and problems of patent. The first section introduces the concept of patent creativity. The second section introduces the development of patent creative judgment in China. The third section puts forward the problem of excessive objectivity in the development of patent creativity, and discusses the influence of this problem and the test of patent creativity in China. The second chapter analyzes the creativity of American patents. The first section introduces the content of the original patent judgment before the KSR case in the United States. The second section expounds the adjustment of the patent creative judgment made in the KSR case of the United States. In the third section, combining two cases of patent creativity examination before and after the KSR case in the United States, the author deeply analyzes the judgment standard of patent creativity in the United States. In chapter three, by comparing the differences and similarities of patent creative judgment between China and the United States, we find out the existing problems of patent creativity in China, and put forward some suggestions for improvement of patent creative judgment. Suggestions include revising the definition of technical personnel in the field and perfecting the test method for obviousness. It is hoped that these suggestions can meet the requirements of patent creative judgment and technological development in China, encourage innovation and promote the sustainable and healthy development of our society.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D923.42;D971.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周春慧;;高智發(fā)明:創(chuàng)新“天使”還是專利“魔鬼”[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年06期

2 夕陽紅;;從幸福二字說開去[J];寧波通訊;2011年12期

3 李玉香;;專利推廣應(yīng)用研究[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年04期

4 彭傳芳;田四平;高鑫;;侯立安:一生做好一件事[J];解放軍生活;2011年08期

5 董暉;王麗萍;;傾心環(huán)保 創(chuàng)造佳績——遼寧“五一”獎(jiǎng)?wù)芦@得者、沈陽市勞動(dòng)模范、沈陽環(huán)境科學(xué)研究院副院長陳曉東[J];當(dāng)代工人(精品版);2011年02期

6 ;面孔[J];農(nóng)村.農(nóng)業(yè).農(nóng)民(A版);2011年07期

7 王敏;王冉;葛瑩歆;;淺析發(fā)明專利保護(hù)客體的審查原則[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2011年09期

8 ;精英[J];今日中國(中文版);2011年06期

9 孫方濤;李燕;;發(fā)明專利申請的修改與超范圍[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年06期

10 王仁貴;;“泡沫”浮生的專利大國[J];w，

本文編號：1874375