本文選題：純粹法學(xué) + 應(yīng)當(dāng)��； 參考：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：純粹法學(xué)立基于實(shí)然與應(yīng)然的兩分。這就是休謨問(wèn)題:事實(shí)與價(jià)值處于不同的領(lǐng)域,事實(shí)命題無(wú)法推導(dǎo)出價(jià)值命題,價(jià)值命題也無(wú)法推導(dǎo)出事實(shí)命題。該問(wèn)題在法律上的表述就是:法律是什么與法律應(yīng)當(dāng)是什么是兩個(gè)截然不同的問(wèn)題。前者描述法律,是實(shí)然問(wèn)題。后者評(píng)價(jià)法律,是應(yīng)然問(wèn)題。 “應(yīng)當(dāng)”是規(guī)范的中心,而規(guī)范又是純粹法學(xué)的中心。正因?yàn)閯P爾森對(duì)是與應(yīng)當(dāng)之間做出了最徹底的區(qū)分,在其規(guī)范之中既排除了道德也排除了事實(shí),純粹法學(xué)獨(dú)特的架構(gòu)才得以構(gòu)建,純之又純的規(guī)范世界才得以形成。所以“應(yīng)當(dāng)”在純粹法學(xué)之中有相當(dāng)重要地位。 本文擬在現(xiàn)有凱爾森著述和中文論文的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)純粹法學(xué)中的“應(yīng)當(dāng)”做一梳理。同時(shí),既然純粹法學(xué)的特點(diǎn)就是從結(jié)構(gòu)上分析實(shí)在法。所以從規(guī)范內(nèi)部結(jié)構(gòu)出發(fā)對(duì)應(yīng)當(dāng)與存在進(jìn)行研究有其無(wú)法替代的重要意義。本文也意圖貫徹此點(diǎn):從規(guī)范內(nèi)部結(jié)構(gòu)著手分析存在與應(yīng)當(dāng)之間的關(guān)系。提供一個(gè)通過(guò)“應(yīng)然”視角觀察純粹法學(xué)的角度。 本文結(jié)構(gòu)是首先簡(jiǎn)介純粹法學(xué)是一門(mén)獨(dú)立科學(xué)之原因,該門(mén)科學(xué)的先天條件�？茖W(xué)的研究對(duì)象是特定的解釋框架。而法學(xué)的解釋框架則是實(shí)在法規(guī)范。接著分析規(guī)范的架構(gòu),指出其內(nèi)容是強(qiáng)制而形式則是應(yīng)當(dāng)。進(jìn)而分析應(yīng)當(dāng)?shù)奶攸c(diǎn)。第四章內(nèi)容是應(yīng)當(dāng)與存在的區(qū)分,凱爾森通過(guò)自然法與實(shí)在法的區(qū)分,將正義排除出法學(xué)。通過(guò)法的效力與實(shí)效之間的區(qū)分,將事實(shí)排除出規(guī)范的概念之外。通過(guò)在規(guī)范內(nèi)部的區(qū)分,將命令說(shuō)中的意志成分排除出規(guī)范,經(jīng)過(guò)這樣三次提純,最后得出規(guī)范的概念,純粹法學(xué)得以形成。
[Abstract]:Pure law is based on both real and deserved two points. This is the question of Hume: the fact and the value are in different fields, the fact proposition can not deduce the value proposition, the value proposition can not deduce the fact proposition. The question in law is that what the law is and what the law should be are two completely different problems. The latter describes the law as a matter of fact.
"Ought" is the center of norm, and the norm is the center of pure law. It is precisely because Kelsen makes the most thorough distinction between it and it. In its norms, it excludes morality and excludes facts. The unique structure of pure jurisprudence is constructed, pure and pure standard world can be formed. So "should" There is a very important position in pure jurisprudence.
On the basis of the existing writings of Kelsen and Chinese, this article is to sort out the "ought" in the pure law. At the same time, since the characteristic of the pure law is to analyze the actual law from the structure, it has its irreplaceable significance to the study of the existence and the existence from the internal structure of the standard. This article also aims to carry out this point. From the standpoint of internal structure, we should analyze the relationship between existence and ought to provide a perspective of pure jurisprudence from the perspective of "ought to be".
The structure of this article is first to introduce the reason that pure law is an independent science, the innate condition of the science. The object of science is the specific framework of interpretation. The framework of the interpretation of law is the standard of reality. Then, the framework of the standard is analyzed, and the content is the compulsory and the form is ought to be. Fourth The content of the chapter is the distinction between the law and the existence. Through the distinction between the natural law and the real law, Kelsen excludes the justice from the law. Through the distinction between the effectiveness and the effectiveness of the law, the fact is excluded from the concept of the standard. Through the distinction between the norms, the will components in the command theory are excluded from the norms, and the three purification, finally, is the last. The concept of standard is obtained, and pure law is formed.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D90

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 劉葉深;;評(píng)凱爾森的法律效力理論[J];廈門(mén)大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2007年01期

2 陳銳;論法律實(shí)證主義[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年01期

3 中山龍一,周永勝;二十世紀(jì)法理學(xué)的范式轉(zhuǎn)換[J];外國(guó)法譯評(píng);2000年03期

4 梁曉儉;試論凱爾森基礎(chǔ)規(guī)范理論的合理性[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2002年01期

5 王莉君;論凱爾森純粹法理論的基本概念[J];政法論壇;2003年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 張書(shū)友;法律實(shí)證主義傳統(tǒng)中的凱爾森[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2005年

2 馬英;理解凱爾森[D];吉林大學(xué);2005年

3 魏延娜;凱爾森的規(guī)范理論研究[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1813222