本文選題：古代判詞 + 情理��； 參考：《湘潭大學》2017年博士論文

【摘要】：中國古代判詞就是中國古代的“裁判文書”,是我國歷代司法官員以法律為依據(jù)對是非曲直的判斷與評價所得出的結(jié)論。能夠正確適用法律、能有效說服兩造、最大程度地教化社會的判詞堪稱好判詞,好判詞的說理要既合“情理”又具“文采”。本文共分為七章。第一章為“緒論”。第一節(jié)首先介紹了選題的意義,指出本選題的意義在于分析和挖掘中國古代判詞里的“情理”和“文采”,裨益于今日裁判文書質(zhì)量的改善。第二節(jié)介紹了古代判詞“情理”和“文采”的國內(nèi)外研究述評;第三節(jié)介紹了本文的研究思路和創(chuàng)新之處,本文嘗試對判詞的說理藝術(shù)和判詞的文學性進行法學與文學雙重特性的跨界研究。第二章為“中國古代判詞的概貌、邏輯和說理模式”。第一節(jié)介紹了中國古代判詞概貌。第二節(jié)介紹了中國古代判詞的邏輯,中國古代判詞最富有邏輯性,在說理中往往寓簡潔生動于精密嚴謹、寓人文關(guān)懷于法律條文、寓文學性于邏輯性。第三節(jié)介紹了中國古代判詞的說理模式,中國古代判詞說理往往會訴諸情感、訴諸典故、訴諸道德、訴諸文化。第三章為“唐代判詞的情理與文采”。唐判“文辭華麗、語句典雅”,是我國判詞發(fā)展史上第一座豐碑,駢判作為一種文體正式確立。第一節(jié)介紹了唐代判詞概貌。第二節(jié)以《龍筋鳳髓判》為典型對唐判進行考察,唐判謀篇布局精細完整,文辭藻飾駢麗浮華,用典巧妙。第三節(jié)以《甲乙判》為典型對唐判進行考察,《甲乙判》的語言上善用比喻、多用典故、文辭簡練、表達準確、說理充分,《甲乙判》里的情理表現(xiàn)為引經(jīng)決獄、以民為本,《甲乙判》里的禮法表現(xiàn)為法有馳張、禮法迭相為用。第四章為“宋代判詞的情理與文采”。宋代流行散判,判詞說理條分縷析、重視對事實的認定,且引律為判、說服力強,宋判是我國判詞發(fā)展史上第二座豐碑。第一節(jié)介紹了宋代判詞概貌。第二節(jié)以《名公書判清明集》為典型對宋判進行考察,《名公書判清明集》在語體上辭尚體要、圓通博約、言淺情真,《名公書判清明集》里的情理表現(xiàn)為對法意與人情關(guān)系的把握和在具體案件中對情理的探詢與分析。第五章為“明代判詞的情理與文采”。第一節(jié)介紹了明代判詞概貌。第二節(jié)以《折獄新語》為典型對明判進行考察,言語的情感化趨向和語言的形象化傾向是《折獄新語》的語言風格;在《折獄新語》的判詞里,往往能看到司法審判對人情、世情和常理等情理因素的考慮;恤刑慎殺、刑罰適當、教化與息訟是體現(xiàn)在《折獄新語》中的司法理念。第六章為“清代判詞的情理與文采”。第一節(jié)介紹了清代判詞的概貌。第二節(jié)以《張船山判牘》為典型對清判進行考察,考察了《張船山判牘》的文學風貌與詩人性情、法律正義與道德教化、文學與司法的巧妙結(jié)合。第七章為“改善當今裁判文書質(zhì)量的幾點思考”。第一節(jié)介紹了當今我國裁判文書的現(xiàn)狀。第二節(jié)介紹了影響我國當前裁判文書質(zhì)量的觀念因素、制度因素和制判主體因素。第三節(jié)提出了我國當前裁判文書質(zhì)量改善的進路,具體在于改變輕視裁判文書制作的觀念、建立健全相應配套制度、讓裁判文書的說理富于“情理”和“文采”。
[Abstract]:The ancient Chinese referee is the "referee document" in ancient China. It is the conclusion that the judicial officials of our country have obtained from the judgment and evaluation of the right and wrong based on the law. It can apply the law correctly, can effectively persuade the two cases, and the greatest degree of teaching the judgment of the society can be called good judgment. This article is divided into seven chapters. The first chapter is the introduction. First section first introduces the significance of the topic, and points out that the significance of this topic is to analyze and excavate the "reason" and "literary grace" in the ancient Chinese judgments. The first section is beneficial to the improvement of the quality of today's referee's documents. The second section introduces the ancient judgments "reason" and "literary grace". In the third section, the author introduces the research ideas and innovations of this article. This article tries to carry out the cross boundary research on the dual characteristics of jurisprudence and literature. The second chapter is "the outline of ancient Chinese words, logic and reasoning model". The first section introduces the outline of ancient Chinese words. The second section introduces the logic of ancient Chinese words. The ancient Chinese words are most logical. In the reasoning, they often contain concise and precise, precise, precise and precise, the humanistic care in the legal provisions and the literariness of logic. The third section introduces the reasoning mode of ancient Chinese words, and the ancient Chinese words often appeal to emotion and resort to allusions. The third chapter is "the reason and the culture of the judgment of the Tang Dynasty". The Tang sentence "the magnificent words and the elegance" is the first monument in the history of the Chinese word judgment and the formal establishment of the parallel sentence as a style. The first section introduces the general appearance of the Tang Dynasty. The second section is a typical study of the Tang sentence with the Dragon Phoenix judgment. In the third section, the language of the first and the second is a typical example of the Tang sentence, and the language of "the first and the second" is used as a metaphor. The fourth chapter is "the reason and the literary appreciation of the Song Dynasty." the Song Dynasty's popular judgment, the judgment of the truth, the law as the judgment, the strong persuasion, the song judgment is the second monument in the history of the Chinese word development. The first section introduces the general appearance of the Song Dynasty's judgment. The second section takes the "the name of the public book to judge Qingming collection" as the second section. A typical study of the song sentence is carried out. The fifth chapter is "the reason and the literary criticism of the Ming Dynasty." the first section introduces the Ming Dynasty. The second section makes a survey on the new language of "the new language of imprisonment". The emotional tendency of speech and the tendency to visualize the language are the language style of the neologism. In the judgment of the neologism, the judiciary can often see the consideration of the human, the world and the normal factors in the judgment of the judiciary; the punishment is prudent, the punishment is appropriate, and the teaching is civilized. The sixth chapter introduces the general appearance of the Qing Dynasty's judgment. The first section introduces the general appearance of the Qing Dynasty's judgment. The second section takes Zhang Chuanshan Du Du as a typical case of the Qing Dynasty, and examines the literary style and the poet's nature, the legal justice and the moral education, the literature and the Department. The seventh chapter is "Some Thoughts on improving the quality of today's referee documents". The first section introduces the present situation of our country's referee documents. The second section introduces the concept factors, institutional factors and main factors that affect the quality of the current referee documents in our country. The third section puts forward the improvement of the quality of the current referee's documents in our country. The way is to change the concept of despising the production of judicial documents, establish and improve the corresponding supporting system, and make the reasoning of judicial documents rich in "reason" and "literary grace".

【學位授予單位】：湘潭大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D929

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 拉毛;;從《甲乙判》看唐代判詞的語言特點[J];青海民族大學學報(社會科學版);2010年04期

2 拉毛;;唐代判詞與士人價值觀——以白居易《甲乙判》為例[J];時代文學(下半月);2012年12期

3 崔明石;;事實與規(guī)范之間:情理法的再認識——以《名公書判清明集》為考察依據(jù)[J];當代法學;2010年06期

4 劉小明;;《名公書判清明集》所見南宋親屬間訴訟[J];唐山學院學報;2012年05期

5 孔學;《名公書判清明集》所引宋代法律條文述論[J];河南大學學報(社會科學版);2003年02期

6 崔明石;;情理法的正當性:以“情”為核心的闡釋———以《名公書判清明集》為考察依據(jù)[J];吉林師范大學學報(人文社會科學版);2011年02期

7 鄭穎慧;;《名公書判清明集》中奩產(chǎn)訴訟探析[J];保定學院學報;2013年02期

8 王志強;《名公書判清明集》法律思想初探[J];法學研究;1997年05期

9 唐智燕;;《名公書判清明集》數(shù)字名探析[J];漢語史研究集刊;2008年00期

10 郭東旭;李婕;;南宋蔡杭法律思想探析——以《名公書判清明集》為中心[J];宋史研究論叢;2007年00期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 劉文基;談笑間,蹊蹺案件水落石出[N];上海法治報;2012年

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前2條

1 黃霞（黃俠）;中國古代判詞的情理與文采[D];湘潭大學;2017年

2 劉小明;唐宋判文研究[D];華東師范大學;2012年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前10條

1 唐楠;從白居易判詞看唐代婚姻家庭制度[D];黑龍江大學;2015年

2 張鳳雷;《名公書判清明集》中民事判詞的情理法研究[D];鄭州大學;2016年

3 洪毓敏;《名公書判清明集》中關(guān)于民事經(jīng)濟訴訟的研究[D];云南大學;2016年

4 王小飛;宋代女性訴訟問題研究[D];南開大學;2016年

5 胡月明;從《名公書判清明集》看南宋的情理法[D];吉林大學;2007年

6 王麟;從《名公書判清明集》看南宋婦女的守寡與再嫁[D];中國政法大學;2005年

7 高見;從《名公書判清明集》看宋代判詞的特點和精神指向[D];吉林大學;2007年

8 趙炎;從《名公書判清明集》看南宋名公的審判理念[D];安徽大學;2015年

9 汪初蕓;《名公書判清明集》中所見南宋女性訴訟[D];西南政法大學;2006年

10 胡瓊;從《名公書判清明集》看南宋典賣糾紛與訴訟解決[D];海南大學;2012年

，

本文編號：1792103