法人類(lèi)學(xué)視野下的糾紛及糾紛解決研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-04-06 21:12
本文選題:法人類(lèi)學(xué) 切入點(diǎn):糾紛 出處:《西北師范大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文
【摘要】:關(guān)于糾紛的研究在法人類(lèi)學(xué)中一直占據(jù)著重要的地位,糾紛一直都是法人類(lèi)學(xué)研究的重要內(nèi)容。本文著重研究法人類(lèi)學(xué)視野中的糾紛,試圖對(duì)法人類(lèi)學(xué)對(duì)糾紛研究的發(fā)展與變化進(jìn)行梳理,對(duì)法人類(lèi)學(xué)領(lǐng)域中的糾紛研究進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的闡述,研究側(cè)重闡釋性,進(jìn)而提出了法人類(lèi)學(xué)糾紛研究對(duì)于我國(guó)法學(xué)研究的有益啟示。本文共六部分: 第一部分導(dǎo)論。介紹法人類(lèi)學(xué)糾紛研究的目的與意義。本文的研究對(duì)象是法人類(lèi)學(xué)視野中的糾紛,研究的意義旨在通過(guò)闡釋糾紛解決機(jī)制的文化屬性和地方特性,區(qū)分糾紛處理的要素,以便更好的理解其賴(lài)以存在的條件,使各種利益相對(duì)協(xié)調(diào),各種價(jià)值觀和諧共存,各種社會(huì)機(jī)制有機(jī)互動(dòng),運(yùn)用多元化的規(guī)范和糾紛解決機(jī)制,使得沖突和糾紛得以最平和、經(jīng)濟(jì)和有效的解決。 第二部分法人類(lèi)學(xué)概述。首先對(duì)法人類(lèi)學(xué)的概念進(jìn)行介紹與闡釋,提出法人類(lèi)學(xué)相對(duì)于規(guī)范法學(xué)而言,展示的是一種別具特色、行之有效的思考進(jìn)路和研究方法。其次通過(guò)分析法人類(lèi)學(xué)與文化人類(lèi)學(xué)、法社會(huì)學(xué)等相關(guān)學(xué)科的關(guān)系,厘清了法人類(lèi)學(xué)的研究對(duì)象與研究方法。 第三部分闡釋法人類(lèi)學(xué)語(yǔ)境下的糾紛與糾紛解決。首先介紹法人類(lèi)學(xué)糾紛研究的理論背景,法人類(lèi)學(xué)對(duì)于糾紛的研究都是從糾紛的價(jià)值和意義世界入手的,是以法律的可持續(xù)多樣性和法律多元為架構(gòu)的。通過(guò)對(duì)法人類(lèi)學(xué)糾紛研究的理論背景的介紹,為后面進(jìn)一步分析打下了基礎(chǔ)。 第四部分回顧、歸納了法人類(lèi)學(xué)糾紛及糾紛解決研究的兩種路徑。介紹法人類(lèi)學(xué)關(guān)于糾紛研究的兩個(gè)不同階段,分析法人類(lèi)學(xué)關(guān)于糾紛研究的歷史演進(jìn)。 第五部分分析法人類(lèi)學(xué)糾紛及糾紛解決研究的當(dāng)代趨勢(shì)。 第六部分總結(jié)法人類(lèi)學(xué)關(guān)于糾紛及糾紛解決研究對(duì)于我國(guó)法學(xué)研究的有益啟示。
[Abstract]:The study of disputes has always occupied an important position in legal anthropology, and dispute has always been an important part of the study of legal anthropology.This paper focuses on the disputes in the field of legal anthropology, tries to sort out the development and changes of the dispute research in legal anthropology, systematically expounds the dispute research in the field of legal anthropology, and emphasizes on the interpretation.Furthermore, it puts forward the beneficial enlightenment of the dispute study of legal anthropology to the legal research of our country.This paper consists of six parts:The first part is introduction.This paper introduces the purpose and significance of the study of disputes in legal anthropology.The research object of this paper is disputes in the perspective of legal anthropology. The significance of the study is to distinguish the elements of dispute resolution by explaining the cultural attributes and local characteristics of dispute resolution mechanism, so as to better understand the conditions on which they exist.Make all kinds of interests relatively coordinate, all kinds of values coexist harmoniously, all kinds of social mechanism interact organically, use the pluralistic norm and the dispute resolution mechanism, make the conflict and the dispute to be most peaceful, economical and effective solution.The second part is an overview of legal anthropology.First of all, the concept of legal anthropology is introduced and explained, and it is put forward that legal anthropology shows a unique and effective way of thinking and research in comparison with normative jurisprudence.Secondly, by analyzing the relationship between anthropology and cultural anthropology, sociology of law and other related disciplines, this paper clarifies the research object and method of legal anthropology.The third part is the dispute and dispute settlement in the context of Anthropology of hermeneutics.Firstly, it introduces the theoretical background of the dispute research in legal anthropology, which is based on the world of value and significance of dispute, and is based on the sustainable diversity of law and pluralism of law.By introducing the theoretical background of legal anthropology dispute research, this paper lays a foundation for further analysis.The fourth part reviews the two ways of legal anthropology dispute and dispute resolution.This paper introduces two different stages of dispute study in legal anthropology, and the historical evolution of dispute study in analytic anthropology.The fifth part analyzes the contemporary trend of anthropological dispute and dispute resolution.The sixth part summarizes the beneficial enlightenment of legal anthropology on disputes and dispute resolution.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:西北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D90-05
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條
1 羅洪洋;;法人類(lèi)學(xué)論綱——兼與法社會(huì)學(xué)比較[J];法商研究;2007年02期
2 張冠梓;法人類(lèi)學(xué)的理論、方法及其流變[J];國(guó)外社會(huì)科學(xué);2003年05期
3 喬麗榮;仲崇建;;從博弈到認(rèn)同——法人類(lèi)學(xué)關(guān)于糾紛研究的旨趣、路徑及其理論建構(gòu)[J];黑龍江民族叢刊;2005年06期
4 孫新強(qiáng);;盧埃林現(xiàn)實(shí)主義法理學(xué)思想[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2009年04期
5 蘇力;再論法律規(guī)避[J];中外法學(xué);1996年04期
,本文編號(hào):1718923
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/1718923.html
教材專(zhuān)著