本文選題：突發(fā)公共衛(wèi)生事件　切入點(diǎn)：美國(guó)政府　出處：《東北師范大學(xué)》2015年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：人類與傳染病的斗爭(zhēng)已有上千年的歷史,天花、黑死病、1918年紐約大流感都在人類的歷史上刻下了陰森森的恐懼。突發(fā)公共衛(wèi)生事件除去這種自然爆發(fā)的形態(tài)以外,有些傳染病的病毒如天花、霍亂也可以成為生物戰(zhàn)劑,變成戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)武器,即生物武器,其目的就是“蓄意疾病”,它對(duì)戰(zhàn)后尤其是冷戰(zhàn)后的美國(guó)政治安全、軍事安全、經(jīng)濟(jì)安全和公共安全構(gòu)成了越來(lái)越大的威脅。冷戰(zhàn)的結(jié)束使新的因素不斷被注入到國(guó)家安全問(wèn)題中來(lái),從而不斷衍生出新的問(wèn)題和矛盾,由傳染病所引發(fā)的突發(fā)公共衛(wèi)生事件和生物恐怖主義,對(duì)各國(guó)國(guó)家安全政策的制定產(chǎn)生了深遠(yuǎn)的影響。美國(guó)作為冷戰(zhàn)后唯一的超級(jí)大國(guó),其國(guó)家安全受非傳統(tǒng)國(guó)家安全因素的影響最為深遠(yuǎn)。“9.11”及之后的炭疽桿菌事件,將美國(guó)國(guó)家安全的內(nèi)涵由傳統(tǒng)意義上的政治、軍事安全擴(kuò)展到經(jīng)濟(jì)安全、生態(tài)安全、資源安全、信息安全、文化安全、公共安全、科技安全、食品安全等諸多領(lǐng)域,生物恐怖所導(dǎo)致的突發(fā)公共衛(wèi)生事件從根本上改變了美國(guó)國(guó)家安全政策的發(fā)展軌跡。本文選取1992-2008年這一時(shí)期美國(guó)國(guó)家安全視野中的突發(fā)公共衛(wèi)生事件對(duì)策研究作為研究題目,試圖利用美國(guó)政府的公開(kāi)文檔、解密文檔及相關(guān)的研究成果,探索從克林頓政府到喬治·W·布什政府這一時(shí)限內(nèi)美國(guó)國(guó)家安全視野中突發(fā)公共衛(wèi)生事件對(duì)策的發(fā)展進(jìn)程。從而揭示出由傳染病引發(fā)的突發(fā)公共衛(wèi)生事件對(duì)美國(guó)國(guó)家安全政策的巨大影響；作為雙方構(gòu)建的結(jié)果,美國(guó)國(guó)家安全政策又在何種程度、以何種方式影響了美國(guó)政府突發(fā)公共衛(wèi)生事件應(yīng)對(duì)政策的制定。本文采用史論結(jié)合、點(diǎn)面結(jié)合、微觀視角與宏觀視角相結(jié)合以及比較的研究方法,擬達(dá)到四個(gè)研究目的：(1)通過(guò)對(duì)克林頓政府和喬治·W·布什政府應(yīng)對(duì)突發(fā)公共衛(wèi)生事件政策的闡述和分析,探求異同,揭示出其發(fā)展變化的規(guī)律；(2)通過(guò)對(duì)突發(fā)公共衛(wèi)生事件與美國(guó)國(guó)家安全二者之間關(guān)系的考察,探究突發(fā)公共衛(wèi)生事件與美國(guó)國(guó)家安全政策相互影響、相互構(gòu)建過(guò)程；(3)通過(guò)考察美國(guó)政府內(nèi)部各應(yīng)急管理部門對(duì)應(yīng)對(duì)突發(fā)公共衛(wèi)生事件的不同主張,揭示出美國(guó)各政治勢(shì)力對(duì)應(yīng)對(duì)突發(fā)公共衛(wèi)生事件政策和美國(guó)國(guó)家安全政策制定的影響力；(4)通過(guò)對(duì)1992年至2008年美國(guó)應(yīng)對(duì)突發(fā)公共衛(wèi)生事件政策研究中的一些案例分析,進(jìn)一步探討相關(guān)的國(guó)際關(guān)系理論的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Human struggle against infectious diseases has been going on for thousands of years. Smallpox, the Black death, and in 1918 the New York pandemic has engraved a grim fear in human history. Public health emergencies aside from this natural outbreak, Some infectious diseases such as smallpox, cholera can also become biological warfare agents, become weapons of war, that is, biological weapons, its purpose is "deliberate disease," it is post-war, especially after the cold war, the political security of the United States, military security, Economic and public security pose an increasing threat. With the end of the cold war, new factors are constantly being injected into national security issues, thus creating new problems and contradictions. Public health emergencies and bioterrorism caused by infectious diseases have had a profound impact on the formulation of national security policies. Its national security is most profoundly affected by non-traditional national security factors. The September 11 incident and the subsequent anthrax incident extended the connotation of American national security from traditional political and military security to economic security, ecological security, and resource security. Information security, cultural security, public security, science and technology security, food security and many other fields, The emergent public health events caused by bioterrorism have fundamentally changed the development trajectory of the national security policy of the United States. In this paper, the countermeasures of public health emergencies in the field of national security from 1992 to 2008 are selected as the research topics. Trying to use the U.S. government's public documents, declassified documents, and related research results, To explore the development process of the public health emergency response in the national security vision from the Clinton administration to the George W. Bush administration, thus revealing the impact of infectious diseases on public health emergencies in the United States. The enormous impact of home security policies; As a result of the two sides' construction, what extent and how did the national security policy of the United States affect the formulation of the policy of the United States government to deal with public health emergencies. A combination of microscopic and macro perspectives and comparative research methods, designed to achieve four research objectives: 1) through the elaboration and analysis of the Clinton administration and George W. Bush administration's policies to deal with public health emergencies, the similarities and differences are explored. By examining the relationship between public health emergencies and national security in the United States, this paper explores the interaction between public health emergencies and national security policies in the United States. By examining the different opinions of various emergency management departments within the United States Government on responding to public health emergencies, This paper reveals the influence of various American political forces on the policy of responding to public health emergencies and the formulation of national security policy. Through some case studies from 1992 to 2008, this paper makes a case study on the policy of responding to public health emergencies in the United States. To further explore the development of relevant international relations theory.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D971.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 曹廣文;突發(fā)公共衛(wèi)生事件應(yīng)急反應(yīng)基礎(chǔ)建設(shè)及其應(yīng)急管理[J];公共管理學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

2 王宏偉;;美國(guó)應(yīng)急管理的發(fā)展歷程[J];國(guó)際資料信息;2007年01期

3 胡善聯(lián);國(guó)外幾種主要傳染病的疫情及研究動(dòng)態(tài)(1994～1995年)[J];國(guó)外醫(yī)學(xué)(流行病學(xué)傳染病學(xué)分冊(cè));1996年01期

4 王宏偉;;美國(guó)應(yīng)急管理的發(fā)展與演變[J];國(guó)外社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年02期

5 李偉;;突發(fā)公共衛(wèi)生事件應(yīng)急機(jī)制若干行政法律問(wèn)題探討[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年05期

6 徐繼敏;突發(fā)公共衛(wèi)生事件中政府、社會(huì)組織和個(gè)人責(zé)任研究[J];探索;2003年04期

7 李書(shū)凱,胡先明;公共衛(wèi)生危機(jī)管理探討[J];衛(wèi)生軟科學(xué);2004年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 于貞杰;公共衛(wèi)生體系研究[D];山東大學(xué);2007年

2 張紅梅;公共危機(jī)的應(yīng)對(duì)與中國(guó)政府的理性選擇[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 楊敬;疾病預(yù)防控制機(jī)構(gòu)應(yīng)急能力結(jié)構(gòu)分析及建設(shè)策略[D];浙江大學(xué);2003年

2 尹曉玲;全球化背景下的政府危機(jī)管理[D];武漢大學(xué);2004年

3 王耀剛;SARS引發(fā)的廣義公共衛(wèi)生應(yīng)急管理研究[D];天津大學(xué);2004年

4 李孝君;應(yīng)對(duì)突發(fā)公共衛(wèi)生事件的機(jī)制與政策研究[D];國(guó)防科學(xué)技術(shù)大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：1605548