本文選題：反貪污賄賂　切入點：經(jīng)濟學(xué)分析　出處：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：貪污賄賂行為是人類社會的通病,無論是歷史還是現(xiàn)世,無論是國內(nèi)還是國外,反貪污賄賂都是須嚴(yán)陣以待的法學(xué)、政治學(xué)命題。由于反貪污賄賂天然的法律性,及其濃重的政治意味,人們往往會忽略經(jīng)濟、經(jīng)濟學(xué)與反貪污賄賂的重要聯(lián)系。然而,不僅貪污賄賂“以權(quán)謀私”行為本身通常以經(jīng)濟的形式表現(xiàn)出來,其直接的危害也恰恰反映在經(jīng)濟上。甚而,貪污賄賂行為的本質(zhì)是對各類有限資源的掠奪和交換,其經(jīng)濟屬性無法回避。與此相對,反貪污賄賂在法律、政治使命外,也負有經(jīng)濟使命—不僅在于挽回經(jīng)濟損失、維護經(jīng)濟秩序,反貪污賄賂本身也無法擺脫其經(jīng)濟代價是否合理、成本與收益是否相匹配的經(jīng)濟考驗。也可以說,經(jīng)濟學(xué)為我們提供了另一個審視貪污賄賂與反貪污賄賂的視角,給我們創(chuàng)造了另一個檢驗反貪污賄賂成功高效與否的評價標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。 近年來,我國對反貪污賄賂越來越重視,在物質(zhì)和政策上對其投入也不可謂不多,然而國內(nèi)公眾和國際社會對我國反貪污賄賂的效果并不滿意。在透明國際的清廉指數(shù)排名中,我國仍屬于“比較腐敗”國家的行列。近期網(wǎng)絡(luò)爆出的“表哥”和“房叔”事件更是引發(fā)了民眾對我國反貪污賄賂低效益的叩問。因此,我們需要反思我國對反貪污賄賂的社會投入未達到預(yù)期效果的原因何在?以及如何提高反貪污賄賂的效益?本文的研究背景即是目前對貪污賄賂犯罪的重治無效,由此提出反貪污賄賂成本與收益不相符的假設(shè),通過經(jīng)濟學(xué)分析的方法論證該假設(shè),查找造成該現(xiàn)象的原因,大膽設(shè)想更為高效合理的反貪污賄賂模式,最后得出結(jié)論。 本文正文分為四章。第一章為反貪污賄賂的經(jīng)濟理性,以經(jīng)濟學(xué)為視角探討貪污賄賂行為造成的直接經(jīng)濟損失和間接經(jīng)濟代價,探討反貪污賄賂的經(jīng)濟目的。第二章為反貪污賄賂的效益分析,通過對最高檢工作報告、上海反貪年報、以及國際組織的指數(shù)中數(shù)據(jù)的收集,來闡釋反貪污賄賂的成本與收益,在此基礎(chǔ)上分析我國目前的反貪污賄賂效益。第三章為反貪污賄賂效益的抑制因素,在對我國反貪污賄賂效益分析的基礎(chǔ)上,反思抑制反貪污賄賂效益的原因,包括犯罪成本過低、制度滯后乏力,以及國際刑事司法合作不暢。第四章為反貪污賄賂的戰(zhàn)略調(diào)整,通過借鑒國際經(jīng)驗,提出調(diào)整反貪污賄賂側(cè)重點、整合反貪污賄賂組織的設(shè)想。
[Abstract]:Corruption and bribery is a common disease in human society. Whether in history or in the world, whether at home or abroad, anti-corruption and bribery is a legal and political proposition that must be confronted with in full force. Because of the natural legal nature of anti-corruption and bribery, With its strong political implications, people tend to ignore the important links between the economy, economics and the fight against corruption and bribery. However, not only is corruption and bribery "abuse of power" itself usually in the form of an economy. Its direct harm is also reflected in the economy. Even, the essence of corruption and bribery is the plundering and exchange of all kinds of limited resources, and its economic attribute cannot be evaded. In contrast, the anti-corruption and bribery is beyond the legal and political mission. There is also an economic mission-not only to recover the economic losses and maintain the economic order, but also to fight corruption and bribery itself without getting rid of the economic test of whether the economic costs are reasonable and whether the costs and benefits match. Economics provides us with another perspective to examine corruption and bribery and creates another evaluation standard to test the success and efficiency of anti-corruption bribery. In recent years, our country has paid more and more attention to the fight against corruption and bribery, and has put more money into it in terms of material and policy. However, the domestic public and the international community are not satisfied with the effectiveness of our country's fight against corruption and bribery. China is still one of the "relatively corrupt" countries. The recent "cousin" and "Uncle Fang" incidents on the Internet have even aroused people's question about the low efficiency of the fight against corruption and bribery in our country. We need to reflect on the reasons why our social investment in the fight against corruption and bribery has not achieved the expected results. And how to improve the effectiveness of the fight against corruption and bribery? The research background of this paper is that the current treatment of corruption and bribery is ineffective, so the assumption that the cost of anti-corruption and bribery is inconsistent with the income is put forward, and the hypothesis is proved by the method of economic analysis to find out the causes of this phenomenon. Boldly imagine a more efficient and reasonable anti-corruption and bribery model, and finally come to a conclusion. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is the economic rationality of anti-corruption and bribery. From the perspective of economics, this paper discusses the direct economic loss and indirect economic cost caused by corruption and bribery. Chapter two is an analysis of the benefits of combating corruption and bribery. The cost and benefits of combating corruption and bribery are explained through the collection of data from the Supreme Inspection report, the Shanghai Annual report on Corruption and Corruption and the index of international organizations. The third chapter is about the restraining factors of anti-corruption and bribery benefit. On the basis of the analysis of anti-corruption bribery benefit in China, the reasons of restraining corruption and bribery benefit are reconsidered. Chapter 4th is the strategic adjustment of anti-corruption and bribery. By drawing lessons from international experience, it proposes to adjust the focus of anti-corruption and bribery. The idea of integrating anti-corruption and bribery organizations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D924.392;D90-059

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡鞍鋼,過勇;轉(zhuǎn)型期防治腐敗的綜合戰(zhàn)略與制度設(shè)計[J];管理世界;2001年06期

2 程振源;;西方腐敗經(jīng)濟學(xué)綜述[J];國外社會科學(xué);2006年05期

3 沈友軍;香港廉政體制對內(nèi)地廉政建設(shè)的啟迪[J];湖南師范大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;1998年02期

4 夏業(yè)良;反腐敗經(jīng)濟學(xué):成本與收益的經(jīng)濟學(xué)分析[J];上海經(jīng)濟研究;2000年06期

5 盛宇明;腐敗的經(jīng)濟學(xué)分析[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2000年05期

6 劉文革,張廣中,曲振濤;道德文化、腐敗與經(jīng)濟轉(zhuǎn)型——對中國轉(zhuǎn)型期一個基于道德腐敗的經(jīng)濟學(xué)分析[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2003年12期

7 劉啟君;彭亞平;;行為環(huán)境、社會資本與腐敗均衡的演化機制[J];經(jīng)濟社會體制比較;2012年05期

8 安德魯·施萊弗;羅伯特·維什尼;孔雁;;腐敗問題研究[J];經(jīng)濟社會體制比較;2012年05期

9 謝地;丁肇勇;;公共投資、經(jīng)濟增長與腐敗的相關(guān)問題研究[J];求是學(xué)刊;2003年01期

10 閆海燕;;腐敗與反腐敗的成本效益分析[J];社科縱橫;2011年01期

，

本文編號：1596558