本文關鍵詞： 布萊克 法律社會學 司法社會學理論 案件社會結構　出處：《西南政法大學》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：本文主要是對唐納德·布萊克司法社會學理論的解讀和分析，，司法社會學理論是布萊克純粹法社會學思想在司法實踐中的具體運用和發(fā)展。他為法律社會學研究開辟了一個全新的視域，使人耳目一新。目前學界對布萊克純粹法社會學思想的研究已取得了很豐碩的成果。本文擬在目前學界對純粹法社會學思想已有的研究成果基礎上，對布萊克的司法社會學理論做一個較為詳盡而全面的分析。這不僅可以讓我們更為深刻的理解布萊克純粹法社會學思想的精髓，也能讓我們更為清晰地看到布萊克所構建的司法社會學理論體系和良苦用心即為司法理論和實踐提供一個全新的思維框架。在對布萊克司法社會學理論進行分析的基礎上，我們可以發(fā)現(xiàn)一個分析和研究法律的全新的視域，從中也可以看到在司法實踐中有太多的社會性因素影響和干擾了司法的運作和判決的結果。 司法社會學理論主要是圍繞案件的社會結構來進行分析的，即案件在社會場域中的位置和方向。在司法實踐中，影響案件處理結果的社會性因素實在太多，那么如何消減這些社會性因素對司法裁判的負面影響自然成為司法社會學理論關注的焦點。司法社會學理論認為，法律是具有相對性的，隨著案件的社會結構的不同而呈現(xiàn)出差異。只有在案件的社會結構大致相同的情況下，法律上相同案件相同處理，類似案件類似處理的結論才能成立。在布萊克教授看來，傳統(tǒng)意義上對法律的研究有兩個維度即實體的維度和程序的維度，而他的司法社會學理論則是理解現(xiàn)代社會法律的第三維度即法律社會學的維度，從社會中去理解法律，離開社會，法律將是不可理解的。 本文共分為五個部分：第一部分：引言部分系統(tǒng)論述了論文選題的理由和研究的意義、國內外研究動態(tài)、主要研究內容及研究方法等內容；第二部分：闡述了布萊克司法社會學理論的產(chǎn)生與發(fā)展，以期從理論上梳理布萊克司法社會學理論的思想脈絡；第三部分：是本文的重點，全面分析布萊克的司法社會學理論。主要分析以下兩個方面:對作為科學的法律行為理論的分析；對案件社會結構決定的司法社會學理論進行的微觀分析；第四部分：提出消減社會結構因素對司法運作負面影響的具體對策，需要從三個方面采取措施：法律合作主義；司法的非社會化；社會的非法律化；第五部分：是對布萊克司法社會學理論的評價，主要分析了布萊克在理論上的貢獻以及其司法社會學理論存在的局限性和遭遇的理想和現(xiàn)實的雙重困境；結語部分是對布萊克司法社會學理論的總結和反思。 本文的研究主要采用文本精讀和比較研究相結合的方法，同時借助國內外相關學者的研究成果。
[Abstract]:This paper is mainly about the interpretation and analysis of Donald Black's theory of sociology of justice. The theory of judicial sociology is the concrete application and development of Black's thought of pure sociology of law in judicial practice. At present, great achievements have been made in the study of Black's theory of pure sociology of law. This paper intends to build on the existing research results of the theory of pure sociology of law. To make a detailed and comprehensive analysis of Blake's theory of judicial sociology, which not only makes us understand more deeply the essence of Black's pure sociology of law, It can also make us see more clearly the theoretical system and good intentions of the sociology of justice constructed by Blake, that is, to provide a new thinking framework for the theory and practice of judicature. On the basis of the analysis of Black's theory of sociology of justice, We can find a new field of view to analyze and study the law, from which we can see that there are too many social factors that influence and interfere with the judicial operation and the result of judgment in the judicial practice. The theory of judicial sociology mainly focuses on the social structure of the case, that is, the position and direction of the case in the social field. In judicial practice, there are too many social factors affecting the outcome of the case handling. So, how to reduce the negative influence of these social factors on judicial decision has naturally become the focus of attention in the theory of judicial sociology. According to the theory of judicial sociology, the law is relative. Only when the social structure of the case is roughly the same, the legal case is treated the same, and the similar case is treated in the same way can the conclusion be established. In Professor Black's view, In the traditional sense, there are two dimensions in the study of law, namely, the dimension of substance and the dimension of procedure, while his theory of judicial sociology is to understand the third dimension of modern social law, that is, the dimension of sociology of law, and to understand law from the society. Without society, the law will be incomprehensible. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part: the introduction systematically discusses the reasons and significance of the research, the research trends at home and abroad, the main research content and research methods. The second part: expound the emergence and development of Black's theory of judicial sociology, in order to sort out the thought of Black's theory of sociology of justice theoretically, the third part: is the focal point of this article, A comprehensive analysis of Black's theory of judicial sociology. This paper mainly analyzes the following two aspects: the analysis of the theory of legal behavior as a science, the micro-analysis of the theory of judicial sociology, which determines the social structure of cases; Part 4th: put forward the concrete countermeasures to reduce the negative influence of social structure factors on judicial operation, need to take measures from three aspects: legal cooperation doctrine, judicial non-socialization, social non-legalization; Part 5th: it is the evaluation of Black's theory of judicial sociology. It mainly analyzes Black's contribution in theory and the limitation of his theory of judicial sociology and the dual dilemma of ideal and reality. The conclusion part is the summary and reflection of Black's theory of judicial sociology. The research of this paper mainly adopts the method of text intensive reading and comparative study, at the same time, with the help of the research results of domestic and foreign scholars.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D90-052

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 布迪厄;強世功;;法律的力量——邁向司法場域的社會學[J];北大法律評論;1999年02期

2 黃錦就;葉偉鋒;;重構布萊克法律概念(上)[J];公安學刊(浙江警察學院學報);2010年01期

3 楊建國;;司法權威的社會結構分析[J];西部法學評論;2010年04期

4 李瑜青;張善根;;論在社會結構中的司法與超越——兼評布萊克的《社會學視野中的司法》[J];甘肅政法學院學報;2008年04期

5 趙寒春;;法律行為理論的結構、意義及其局限性——評唐納德·布萊克的《法律的運作行為》[J];科教文匯(上旬刊);2008年01期

6 姚小林;;作為科學形態(tài)的司法社會學[J];蘭州學刊;2009年06期

7 汪祥勝;;司法過程的邏輯——以布迪厄的場域理論為分析視角[J];內蒙古社會科學(漢文版);2007年05期

8 田釩平;試論案件的社會結構對司法公正的影響[J];南通紡織職業(yè)技術學院學報;2004年01期

9 譚岳奇;法律本土化:一種法社會學的視角[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2001年01期

10 張洪濤;論我國法社會學結構性缺陷[J];西南交通大學學報(社會科學版);2005年03期

本文編號：1516118